In post 648, Edgar Allan Pro wrote:@SpecterDeflectors: I don't think effort is indicative of alignment, but I generally do find it easier to get better reads on people who have posted content and engaged with other players/had to deal with some pressure on their slot.
-V
In post 621, Persivul wrote:And look back at his 146. I still really hate that post. I don't know why other people aren't bothered by it.
In post 632, Hellhound wrote:In post 622, Iecerint wrote:The point of putting effort into the game and evaluating players is to vote for scum.
It's a waste of time if you don't do that, or it means you were reading for a different purpose.
ewwwwwwwwwwwwwww
platitudes
In post 649, Hellhound wrote:In post 646, Flubbernugget wrote:I'm honestly more concerned that you took what I said as a personal insult than how it actually affects the game at this point
it kind of was a personal insult
In post 276, Persivul wrote:The point is that you're telegraphing that your reads are likely to change, which looks like nervous scum that knows they should have a progression in their reads.
In post 657, SirCakez wrote:Yo EAP is pretty town though Hellhound.
In post 651, Edgar Allan Pro wrote:How is explaining my approach to Mafia 'scumming it up'?
Keep throwing that shade, Hellhound. It's sunny out today, and I want to stay cool.
In post 654, Flubbernugget wrote:Quote me where I insulted past his play.
In post 301, Edgar Allan Pro wrote:
Don't pull that 'erryone is kicking me man feels bad' appeal.
You did open the game with a spooky gif.
Besides, this sounds like scum-caught-for-the-wrong-reasons.
What don't you agree with with regards to how Max, Flubber, and Cakes are pushing you?
Why does it seem like 'getting kicked in the face'? Even I thought your all-caps outburst post was a bit much, mayne.
-V
In post 521, Hellhound wrote:In post 301, Edgar Allan Pro wrote:
Don't pull that 'erryone is kicking me man feels bad' appeal.
You did open the game with a spooky gif.
Besides, this sounds like scum-caught-for-the-wrong-reasons.
What don't you agree with with regards to how Max, Flubber, and Cakes are pushing you?
Why does it seem like 'getting kicked in the face'? Even I thought your all-caps outburst post was a bit much, mayne.
-V
he jumped in w/ this post after the fact, but all the questions right there he could've easily answered by reading the preceding conversation:
Spoiler:
these are all out of context b/c i just went to our iso and hit the "q+" button for posts that DIRECTLY speak to my opinion on the gamestate but you can click on the links to any of those, read the full conversation and pretty easily follow what happened and figure out 1) what my thought processes reads-wise were and 2) why i was getting frustrated (by the way max, i got frustrated with you mostly b/c it felt like you were nitpicking. probably wasn't all rational but meh, it was a pretty rough week for me.)
varsoon COMPLETELY failed to do any of that though and opted to jump in on the tail-end of the conversation when he thought he could make me look bad. so far, he's given no sign of wanting to develop genuine reads but he has been working pretty hard to spin a coherent narrative and sell the shit out of it.
In post 562, SirCakez wrote:My entire scum pool is the four people voting me gg
In post 562, SirCakez wrote:Probably at least two town in this pool then since I highly doubt all the scum would vote together like that
In post 573, Apricity wrote:Don't understand what zakk sees as vote-worthy, so an explanation would be nice.
In post 590, hiplop wrote:gee its evolution mafia, why might someone as spectacular and grand as I
be talking in such a eloquent, sophisticated,majestic manner
In post 593, Specter Deflectors wrote:Town:
Hellhound
Town for now:
Iece
EAP
Apricity
Cakez
Unsure:
Heat (would lynch)
zakk (would drag my feet on lynching)
Would support lynching:
Flubber
Persivul
Scum:
Shiro
hiplop
lane
