In post 77, knightmare wrote:her trying to say I could be scum sheeping a partner in Smith is a gigantic leap in logic for that stage of the game.
In post 100, Sakura Hana wrote:In post 77, knightmare wrote:is a gigantic leap in logic for that stage of the game.her trying to say I could be scum sheeping a partner in Smith
This part.
You asked me to show you the scum motivation behind your actions, i went and showed every possible scum reason and town reason i could think of, and showed why the town reasons werent possible, yet you spun it around as it being the sole reason i was pushing you.
In post 102, mhsmith0 wrote:@knight: I don't recall her saying or implying that you were my partner. Is it your understanding that sheeping means partners?
In post 104, Sakura Hana wrote:I said it when i was mentioning possible reasons for scum to do what he did on 31
In post 113, mhsmith0 wrote:PPS Did you notice that the only person who hasn't posted since the confirms went in was the scum I caught? Why abandon such a clear winning wagon?
In post 113, mhsmith0 wrote:@knight: This is my first time doing RVS so... I don't know? It does seem that you've been taking this surprisingly seriously, so I wonder if you're a bit too defensive.
But frankly, my scum hunting approach is to try and figure out sincerity, try and figure out who's fake scum hunting, etc. I find it difficult to parse out the BS that's town trying reaction testing and messing with people form the BS that's alignment indicative.
PS Why do you think there's scum on your wagon? Why not just a bunch of townies that thought it'd be fun/interesting/productive to build a quick wagon and see what happens? Do you think that the wagon was a serious attempt to kill you and bring D1 to a quick close?
PPS Did you notice that the only person who hasn't posted since the confirms went in was the scum I caught? Why abandon such a clear winning wagon?
Tbh, I haven't noticed though - but I will be giving players their due diligence as they come in though. Expedience/Madonna seem to be the next two up. In post 114, Sakura Hana wrote:In post 113, mhsmith0 wrote:PPS Did you notice that the only person who hasn't posted since the confirms went in was the scum I caught? Why abandon such a clear winning wagon?
Red Flag here, the game hasn't been open for 24 hours, what's the correlation between time of posting and scumminess?
In post 116, knightmare wrote:PS: Based purely from a mathematical standpoint, it's already likely that there's scum on my wagon. Any random populace in the game of 4 or more players should produce at least one scum. I was up to L-2 at one point. Your question is a good one to ask though. The difference is in how I have been cased. Do you get the vibe that anyone who was wagoning me is doing it just for kicks? Or am I legitimately getting pushed as a serious scum candidate? When it's the latter, knowing my alignment, I now have to discern who is genuine and who is just trying to kill me because they need the mislynch. Can everyone who voted me be all town? Yes, but I strongly doubt it.
In post 45, Boonskiies wrote:In post 43, mhsmith0 wrote:In post 40, knightmare wrote:In post 36, Boonskiies wrote:Alright, but actually. Way too defensive already. It's page 2. Hot damn.
Defensiveness isn't a scum tell.
Townies and scum don't want to get lynched either way. I'm gonna call out bad reasons regardless. This counts as one.
My understanding was the defensiveness WAS a scum tell. Not a "only scum do it" thing but something that leans scum more than town. Am I off base here? Admitted newbie (this is my third game and first participating in RVS) so maybe my theory background is weaker than I thought, so please do correct me if I'm mistaken.
You are correct. I actually do believe defensiveness leans more scum. Especially if scum thinks they are caught and shouldn't be.
mhsmith0 wrote:In post 116, knightmare wrote:PS: Based purely from a mathematical standpoint, it's already likely that there's scum on my wagon. Any random populace in the game of 4 or more players should produce at least one scum. I was up to L-2 at one point. Your question is a good one to ask though. The difference is in how I have been cased. Do you get the vibe that anyone who was wagoning me is doing it just for kicks? Or am I legitimately getting pushed as a serious scum candidate? When it's the latter, knowing my alignment, I now have to discern who is genuine and who is just trying to kill me because they need the mislynch. Can everyone who voted me be all town? Yes, but I strongly doubt it.
What I'm getting from this post is that you honestly thought (or at least heavily suspected) that it was a serious attempt to kill you. What in that stream of votes made you think that? The L-2 vote in particular was such flagrant bullshit that even I picked up on it.
In post 57, Lowell wrote:Oh hey knight is scum. Good find, whoever started this. Early wagons rule. BLOOD!
VOTE: knight
In post 112, Sakura Hana wrote:Funny to see naked votes from the person that hates naked votes and gut reads.
In post 39, Sakura Hana wrote:All these people sheeping me are giving me the chills however...
In post 72, Sakura Hana wrote:P-Edit:
Unvote
Ok there's something very wrong with my wagon getting traction so easily.