Mini 1766: SCP Foundation Mafia (GAME OVER)

jmo16mla · Post Post #975 (ISO) » Sun Mar 13, 2016 3:38 pm

Doing this now.

jmo16mla · Post Post #976 (ISO) » Sun Mar 13, 2016 5:09 pm

I lied. Tomorrow or I'll replace out.

Dream Man · Post Post #977 (ISO) » Sun Mar 13, 2016 5:23 pm

Such candor can only be coming from town.

Klingoncelt · Post Post #978 (ISO) » Sun Mar 13, 2016 7:58 pm

In post 957, Dream Man wrote:
In post 956, Klingoncelt wrote:
In post 953, Dream Man wrote:In fact, nobody confirming Klingon's message, ironically, points further toward Klingon being town, for, it suggests that scum had received the message, and that Klingon is not on their side.

The alignment of the person receiving the message wasn't mentioned in my PM, but would the Mod giving it to a Scum be a good idea?

If your role PM mentioned that the person receiving the message was randomized, then every player has an equal chance of receiving the message. Scum can possibly receive it.

If your role PM suggests that another player with a parallel role to yours receives a message, then either that player replaced out without checking his messages, or does not want to claim and out himself, or you got roleblocked.

I checked with the mod, if my action goes through the result definitely goes to someone.

I could have been roleblocked - but the receiver could have been roleblocked too.

It would make sense to not out him/her self over a dead guy.

Klingoncelt · Post Post #979 (ISO) » Sun Mar 13, 2016 8:05 pm

In post 959, Extrapolated Eagle wrote:

How was it a valid question, you were being sarcastic. And no I'm not going to read all your past games just to be able to say that your play this game is like it was in ycba.

I was being very honest.

This game is truly not at all like my YCBA game, just like your play is different. Don't get me wrong, the wallposts were too much for me to read, I never read anyone's walls, but you're not quite as ... I don't know what word to use that won't anger you, but you seem less aggressive in overall scumhunting.

It's as though you're Scum targeting me because you think I'm still lynchbait.

If you have a lot of time, read the SaGa game. I'm not lynchbait anymore.

Klingoncelt · Post Post #980 (ISO) » Sun Mar 13, 2016 8:07 pm

UNVOTE:

shos · Post Post #981 (ISO) » Mon Mar 14, 2016 1:01 am

In post 777, shos wrote:
...eagle, can you vouch for me-town?

In post 782, Extrapolated Eagle wrote:

In post 777, shos wrote:And that omgus

Lol

...eagle, can you vouch for me-town?

I think so. In what way?

Woof?

In post 789, shos wrote:Woof.

This should really seal this subject.

shos · Post Post #982 (ISO) » Mon Mar 14, 2016 1:02 am

VOTE: scourge

Wagon ahoy

A Real Scourge · Post Post #983 (ISO) » Mon Mar 14, 2016 1:35 am

all Eagle's said is 'probably' town. Eagle didn't receive a message saying 'the player who sent this message is town', or he would have said so. you're not confirmed.

Extrapolated Eagle · Post Post #984 (ISO) » Mon Mar 14, 2016 1:41 am

Klingon tell me in what way the OMGUSing and the panicking you're doing in this game is different from the OMGUSing and panicking in YCBA

A Real Scourge · Post Post #985 (ISO) » Mon Mar 14, 2016 1:43 am

Eagle, i read Saga, and Klingon certainly OMGUSed, but that's apparently normal for her. she also didn't panic, it's more like she retreated and tried to lurk it out.
can you quote her panicking here?

Extrapolated Eagle · Post Post #986 (ISO) » Mon Mar 14, 2016 2:07 am

In post 985, A Real Scourge wrote:Eagle, i read Saga, and Klingon certainly OMGUSed, but that's apparently normal for her. she also didn't panic, it's more like she retreated and tried to lurk it out.
can you quote her panicking here?

I read OMGUSing as panicking because that seems to be the only reason someone would do that.

Extrapolated Eagle · Post Post #987 (ISO) » Mon Mar 14, 2016 2:09 am

In post 985, A Real Scourge wrote:Eagle, i read Saga, and Klingon certainly OMGUSed, but that's apparently normal for her. she also didn't panic, it's more like she retreated and tried to lurk it out.
can you quote her panicking here?

Saga? Was she scum or town there?

How often does she misinterpret/misrepresent people in order to OMGUS them?

A Real Scourge · Post Post #988 (ISO) » Mon Mar 14, 2016 2:16 am

In post 986, Extrapolated Eagle wrote:
In post 985, A Real Scourge wrote:Eagle, i read Saga, and Klingon certainly OMGUSed, but that's apparently normal for her. she also didn't panic, it's more like she retreated and tried to lurk it out.
can you quote her panicking here?

I read OMGUSing as panicking because that seems to be the only reason someone would do that.

Klingon just does it because it's her, as far as i can tell. i'm not certain but she's probably talked about her own meta here?

A Real Scourge · Post Post #989 (ISO) » Mon Mar 14, 2016 2:19 am

In post 987, Extrapolated Eagle wrote:
In post 985, A Real Scourge wrote:Eagle, i read Saga, and Klingon certainly OMGUSed, but that's apparently normal for her. she also didn't panic, it's more like she retreated and tried to lurk it out.
can you quote her panicking here?

Saga? Was she scum or town there?

How often does she misinterpret/misrepresent people in order to OMGUS them?

she was scum there, and i read the scum thread and most of her moves were on purpose, while knowing her own meta.
i don't know how often she does it, as town or scum i only have a single game for reference!

Extrapolated Eagle · Post Post #990 (ISO) » Mon Mar 14, 2016 2:21 am

Ok read YCBA. Also can you defend her omgusing everyone as town without reading the town game?

A Real Scourge · Post Post #991 (ISO) » Mon Mar 14, 2016 2:26 am

can you link it? tho i don't know how reading another scum game will help here.

i just don't think Klingon is lying about her own meta here. you'd know what i meant if you read Saga, but it's such a massive game, i wouldn't have read it at all if i hadn't been casually following it from the beginning! my point is that she did it in Saga because she knew she could get away with it, because it was her meta. Klingon, am i off base here? i wasn't following the game as closely as someone who was playing would have.

Extrapolated Eagle · Post Post #992 (ISO) » Mon Mar 14, 2016 2:30 am

My point is that I made a point about her being OMGUSY like she was in YCBA and she blew it out of proportion, misrepresented it as me trying to meta her and then attacked me for trying to meta her. Which I didn't do in the first place.

On top of all this if you read YCBA her actions were all reactionary and not intentional whatsoever.

And it still baffles me that you're trying to defend her town play with her scum game. I'm so confused as to why you're doing that.

Pedit I'm not accusing her of lying about her meta

A Real Scourge · Post Post #993 (ISO) » Mon Mar 14, 2016 2:34 am

In post 992, Extrapolated Eagle wrote:My point is that I made a point about her being OMGUSY like she was in YCBA and she blew it out of proportion, misrepresented it as me trying to meta her and then attacked me for trying to meta her. Which I didn't do in the first place.

On top of all this if you read YCBA her actions were all reactionary and not intentional whatsoever.

And it still baffles me that you're trying to defend her town play with her scum game. I'm so confused as to why you're doing that.

Pedit I'm not accusing her of lying about her meta

okay, i must've misunderstood then.
okay, this is different than it just being about OMGUS, now you're talking about how she acted after the accusations of OMGUS. i'd have to read again. when i asked about her panicking you just said you took OMGUS as panicking, so i assumed that's what you were talking about.

all i'm saying is that if she purposefully OMGUSed as scum because she knew it was her meta, or even just OMGUSed because it's her usual reaction, then that by itself doesn't indicate anything with her alignment.

isn't comparing her behaviour to a previous game and making a judgement based on it metaing her? i'm not saying you were wrong for doing it, and i still need to look at Klingon's reaction to it, but i think that counts as meta.

Extrapolated Eagle · Post Post #994 (ISO) » Mon Mar 14, 2016 3:17 am

Here let's do this

Me: this is omgusy (which is already anti-town) and she was OMGUSY the time I played with her and she was scum.
Her: omg u don't kno me u don't kno my life go screw urself ur wrong meta meta meta meta meta

Extrapolated Eagle · Post Post #995 (ISO) » Mon Mar 14, 2016 3:19 am

In post 994, Extrapolated Eagle wrote:Here let's do this

Me: this is omgusy (which is already anti-town) and she was OMGUSY the time I played with her and she was scum.
Her: omg u don't kno me u don't kno my life go screw urself ur wrong meta meta meta meta meta

This is why I'm pressing her.

A Real Scourge · Post Post #996 (ISO) » Mon Mar 14, 2016 3:21 am

no need to straw man Eagle, i said i was going to check it out.

that's not furthering your case

Dream Man · Post Post #997 (ISO) » Mon Mar 14, 2016 4:32 am

Eagle, pardon me if I am interrupting the conversation between you and Scourge, but may I interject with my commentary?

I do not seem to be able to follow your line of discussion. It is indeed true that Klingon has a tendency to misrepresent others and utilise the strategy of OMGUS to an unacceptable extent as scum, as evidenced from her past games. However, I do not see such behaviour being the case in this game. So far, I have been able to verify all her accusations and points, which should be indicative of town behaviour.

Looking forward to your views on this,
Dream Man

Davsto · Post Post #998 (ISO) » Mon Mar 14, 2016 5:16 am

VC 2.6

A Real Scourge (3): Raskolnikov, Dream Man, shos
shos (2): MarioManiac4, A Real Scourge
jmo16mla (1): Elsa and Anna

Not Voting (3): jmo16mla, Extrapolated Eagle, Klingoncelt

With 9 alive, it is 5 to lynch. Deadline in (expired on 2016-03-21 08:30:00).

Raskolnikov · Post Post #999 (ISO) » Mon Mar 14, 2016 7:53 am

I forgot this replaced aristo
VOTE: jmo