Mini 1764: Netherspite's SORM III [Game Over]

[Netherspite]

VoteCount 1.6

Aronis (3):

droog, Yarrrrgami, Firebringer

Rory (2):

SnarkySnowman, Aneninen

SnarkySnowman (2):

Aronis, FA_Q2

Aneninen (2):

3dicerolling, shos

droog (1):

Rory

randomidget (1):

Xkfyu

No Lynch (1):

randomidget

Not Voting (1):

Espeonage

With 13 players alive, it takes

7

votes to lynch someone.

The deadline is in

(expired on 2016-03-03 05:40:00)

[Aronis]

VoteCount 1.5

Rory (3):

SnarkySnowman, This is my username, Aneninen

droog (3):

Firebringer, Rory, Yarrrrgami

SnarkySnowman (3):

Aronis, randomidget, FA_Q2

Aneninen (2):

3dicerolling, shos

Aronis (1):

droog

Not Voting (1):

Espeonage

With 13 players alive, it takes

7

votes to lynch someone.

The deadline is in

(expired on 2016-03-03 05:40:00)

@Yarrrrgami

Your vote is not clear enough, it was not counted.

Yarrrrgami cannot even vote properly

[Aronis]

UNVOTE:
VOTE: no lynch

why

Ok, I just got here and it's painfully obvious, even to me.

Do feel free to explain why you think no lynching is a good choice. Because its not that obvious.

[Aronis]

If aronis was scum in secret hitler, he is here too

I was a liberal

[Aronis]

Town gains a huge amount tonight. Generally I would say lynch is fine but we are getting no where. Day 1 lynches almost always hit town. Look at previous iterations.

The odds of us hitting town are 7/13. That's incredibly low compared to most games. And info is only going to help us so much when 1-3 townies end up dead and we dont possess a majority anymore.

[Aronis]

There is one more pirate going under the radar, and he's starting to ping scummy.

Which one?
This one below?

Srry guys. I forgot about this.
And just policy lynch them with me snarky. So much easier then having to ask for a translation every five seconds.

One more post about policy lynches and I'll DayVig you. Regardless of what kind of PR I actually have.

So umm what did I miss?

See above!

UNVOTE:
VOTE: no lynch

Why?

UNVOTE:
VOTE: no lynch

why

Ok, I just got here and it's painfully obvious, even to me.

I'm all ears.

However, we already have claimed 3rd parties. So, assuming they aren't town fake claiming 3rd party, we can guarantee that we don't lynch town.

I can't see any benefit for a townie faking a Third Party PR. However, I can see

damn good reasons

for a Mafia (or a Third Evil) to fake Third Party PR.
Actually Xkfyu's 289 pretty much explains everything.

if we lynch a 3rd party
the other 2 3rd parties will resent us

And why for the sake of all the dancing little nymphs need we care how much the other third parties will resent us? The Neutral Killing is someone we should get rid of, and the same goes for eg. Cult/Auditor (their WinCon don't match ours). What you're saying might be true for certain Neutral Benign PR-s but we don't even know whether they exist at all.

couldnt "town random" become "vt"?

No.
Random Townies are PRs randomized from the Town-PR categories. There's one Government, Protective, Investigative and Killing. The other three could fall into any of those categories. (With certain restrictions.)

I'm down with a massclaim. I am Busdriver.

Stop massclaiming.
That's how we started going down last time.
Also, I think this claim was actually fake.

See above??? See what above what??

And town won last game? Or did I miss a game of this? Idk

[Aronis]

Please claim Aronis.

With 2 votes? One of which is from a person who has been out to get me from game start and the second from someone mindlessly sheeping them. So neither of which are very credible. Not to mention you've played like a complete VI. I'll pass up this opportunity, tyvm.

[SnarkySnowman]

what's a VI?

[Firebringer]

what's a VI?

Village idiot, he is calling your play bad so far.

[Yarrrrgami]

How about we all play one o' me favorite games for long voyages like this.

It be called "Stop talkin' to the snowpirate, he be a jestin' deckhand."

The rules be pretty self-explanatory.

[Firebringer]

Yarrgami, I like you. But I don't think Snow is a jester. That is jsut a easy way to dismiss him.

[Randomnamechange]

There is one more pirate going under the radar, and he's starting to ping scummy.

Which one?
This one below?

Srry guys. I forgot about this.
And just policy lynch them with me snarky. So much easier then having to ask for a translation every five seconds.

One more post about policy lynches and I'll DayVig you. Regardless of what kind of PR I actually have.

So umm what did I miss?

See above!

UNVOTE:
VOTE: no lynch

Why?

UNVOTE:
VOTE: no lynch

why

Ok, I just got here and it's painfully obvious, even to me.

I'm all ears.

However, we already have claimed 3rd parties. So, assuming they aren't town fake claiming 3rd party, we can guarantee that we don't lynch town.

I can't see any benefit for a townie faking a Third Party PR. However, I can see

damn good reasons

for a Mafia (or a Third Evil) to fake Third Party PR.
Actually Xkfyu's 289 pretty much explains everything.

if we lynch a 3rd party
the other 2 3rd parties will resent us

And why for the sake of all the dancing little nymphs need we care how much the other third parties will resent us? The Neutral Killing is someone we should get rid of, and the same goes for eg. Cult/Auditor (their WinCon don't match ours). What you're saying might be true for certain Neutral Benign PR-s but we don't even know whether they exist at all.

couldnt "town random" become "vt"?

No.
Random Townies are PRs randomized from the Town-PR categories. There's one Government, Protective, Investigative and Killing. The other three could fall into any of those categories. (With certain restrictions.)

I'm down with a massclaim. I am Busdriver.

Stop massclaiming.
That's how we started going down last time.
Also, I think this claim was actually fake.

See above??? See what above what??

And town won last game? Or did I miss a game of this? Idk

He was reffering to SORM Ihe missed the game not you. In that game town got screwed over by a massclaim (especially my fault)

[Xkfyu]

In post 308, SnarkySnowman wrote:
I'm down with a massclaim. I am Busdriver.

Stop massclaiming.
That's how we started going down last time.
Also, I think this claim was actually fake.

Considering that this was the second time he has actually claimed, and that no one actually agreed to a mass claim, I'd say it's a pretty good bet that it's fake.

Then why are you not voting here?

Why should I be?

[Xkfyu]

UNVOTE:
VOTE: no lynch

why

Ok, I just got here and it's painfully obvious, even to me.

Do feel free to explain why you think no lynching is a good choice. Because its not that obvious.

Do feel free to explain why you think not properly reading the thread is a good choice.

I've been very (probably the most) vocal about being completely against no lynching. What I was saying was that it was painfully obvious why RM wanted to no lynch, as I've also already explained.

[Xkfyu]

Please claim Aronis.

With 2 votes? One of which is from a person who has been out to get me from game start and the second from someone mindlessly sheeping them. So neither of which are very credible. Not to mention you've played like a complete VI. I'll pass up this opportunity, tyvm.

Actually, you have 3

VOTE: Aronis

oops, I mean 4 votes on you. You really should start reading better.

[shos]

what's a VI?

hilarious

[shos]

VOTE: aronis

This should be 5.

[Xkfyu]

VOTE: aronis

This should be 5.

Is there a reason for that, or are you just hopping on a wagon? Because as far as I can tell, this is the only thing you've said about Aronis:

If aronis was scum in secret hitler, he is here too

Which is pretty flaky, unless you actually have a connection between this game and that one, that you can explain.

[shos]

trust me

[Xkfyu]

trust me

You know full well how ridiculous of a thing to say that is.

[Aneninen]

And we are getting a N1 result list REGARDLESS of the outcome of the lynch. Why do you people keep acting like we're not?

Who said that?

Please claim Aronis.

At L–4 or so?

Yarrrrgami cannot even vote properly

Whut?
You care about everything but scumhunting.

How about we all play one o' me favorite games for long voyages like this.
It be called "Stop talkin' to the snowpirate, he be a jestin' deckhand."
The rules be pretty self-explanatory.

Yarrgami, I like you. But I don't think Snow is a jester. That is jsut a easy way to dismiss him.

He may or may not be a Jester... what a shame would it be if he died at Night trolololol!

He was reffering to SORM Ihe missed the game not you. In that game town got screwed over by a massclaim (especially my fault)

Yeah, I actually didn't remember who was that Nightkill at Night1. However, it wasn't your fault, I think.

VOTE: aronis
This should be 5.

Is there a reason for that, or are you just hopping on a wagon?

Wait-oh. You did the very same right before Shos...
Or was that a pressurizing vote to make Aronis post something relevant?

By the way,
Aronis.
Read list. Now.

[Xkfyu]

In post 318, Xkfyu wrote:
And we are getting a N1 result list REGARDLESS of the outcome of the lynch. Why do you people keep acting like we're not?

Who said that?

Who said what? That we are getting a N1 result list? Or the ones that are acting like we're not?

In post 342, Xkfyu wrote:
In post 341, shos wrote:
VOTE: aronis
This should be 5.

Is there a reason for that, or are you just hopping on a wagon?

Wait-oh. You did the very same right before Shos...
Or was that a pressurizing vote to make Aronis post something relevant?

I thought it was pretty clear in my voting post, and the one just before it, why I was voting for Aronis.

He requested that I explain my stance on no lynching, which he has clearly misinterpretted, even after I have discussed it, at length.

So, he's either completely ignoring what I've said, and is intentionally asking a question that has already been completely answered, or he hasn't been reading anything.

Either way, I don't like it.

[Aneninen]

Who said what? That we are getting a N1 result list? Or the ones that are acting like we're not?

Who made a correlation between NoLynch and N1 results?

As for the other part, I asked the same in my post.

[Xkfyu]

Who said what? That we are getting a N1 result list? Or the ones that are acting like we're not?

Who made a correlation between NoLynch and N1 results?

As for the other part, I asked the same in my post.

@droog we are getting no where with discussion and will probably hit town, we get a huge amount of night info that can help discussion. There's a reason this setup generally starts with day 0

Town gains a huge amount tonight. Generally I would say lynch is fine but we are getting no where. Day 1 lynches almost always hit town. Look at previous iterations.

No, it's not 'clearly', lol.

This setup is less of a mafia game and more of a holy-shit-wtf-game.
so basically just trying to figure out what the hell is going on is a good part of why I offered nolynch

getting a N1 result list could be useful.

RM and shos have both tried to talk us into no lynching using "to get N1 results" as support for their arguments.

[Randomnamechange]

That isn't the point and you know it.