Somewhat lurkish, and when he comes out from hiding his reasons sound fake.
He never removed his random vote, and then went with the easy case on dylan.
Unacceptable.
Why?Setael wrote:Shanba has given a decent reason for his move and his admittance and explanation of his lie seemed Town to me
Why would you expect me to do this without asking me to do it?I was wondering if Guardian would ever address my case on schizmatized but he never did.
What do you mean by this? Why do you think this?I still have lingering schiz suspicions that have carried over to Guardian. He hasn't done much lately.
Why does his admittance seem Town?Guardian wrote:Why?Setael wrote:Shanba has given a decent reason for his move and his admittance and explanation of his lie seemed Town to me
Guardian wrote:What do you mean by this? Why do you think this?I still have lingering schiz suspicions that have carried over to Guardian.He hasn't done much lately.
IN-deed. Also, no one's asked me any questions, and my opinions haven't change, meaning I don't need to post. So, your initial reason for suspecting me, that I "hasn't done much lately" is almost without substance....Setael wrote:By "he hasn't done much lately" I mean that you haven't been posting much content since daybreak. I can look past your lack of solid content since your main suspect is not being particularly active, so I will admit that is not a very strong point against you.
Because xyyzy is town and voting for my second choice suspect after my first choice is lynched and comes up scum is a scum tell?I actually think your xyzzy vote is a stronger point against you.
Wait, so now xyzzy is scum?My main reasoning for schizmatized being scummy was based on the move from the xyzzy wagon to the SSF wagon.
So I am scummy to vote for xyzzy... because it is scummy to vote for scum?I thought both Shanba's and schizmatized moves looked really scummy and very possibly could've been distracting from the xyzzy wagon and onto SSF to protect a scum buddy. (especially where schismatized had said it was too early to lynch xyzzy and then mere posts later he's willing to let SSF hang).
So now xyzzy is town again?If I was wrong about xyzzy's alignment, ScumGuardian would know it.
Ah, I see now, I think. I am trying to lynch xyzzy-town because lynching townies is a town tell?If that is the case, I could see Guardian being motivated to push a xyzzy lynch, so that when xyzzy comes up Town Guardian is cleared - at least of the reasons I had to suspect him.
Oh, but lynching townies is ALSO a scum tell?I could also see scum going for a xyzzy lynch because so many have been suspicious of him and he's now so lurky. If xyzzy is scum, I'm probably wrong since I doubt Guardian would bus both his partners one right after another. I don't think that's the case though... I think it's more likely that Guardian is scum.
OMGUS,This warrants a Guardian vote!vote: Guardian
I think your behavior is a scummy meta decision.JDodge wrote:Do you remember the last time you thought my not giving reasons was an indicator of me being scum?Guardian wrote:Jdodge, I'm sure you've been right before. I'm also sure you've been scum before. Your not giving reasons for who you think is scum --> us not being able to get a read on you --> scummy.
?Rishi wrote:Until we get a replacement for xyzzy or a post from him, the vote stands.
We don't know xyzzy's allignment. It makes no sense to analyze the actions of those defending himBookitty wrote:When asked why he hadn't looked into the people involved in the vote swing away from xyzzy, in order to try to identify scumbuddies since he seemed so certain that xyzzy was scum...Guardian wrote:For all interested: xyzzy here reminds me of xyzzy in Fire & Ice mafia, which I modded. He was scum, and was lynched day one -- as heshould have been here...
How do you reconcile these two rather conflicting statements? Your level of certainty seems to swing pretty widely in only a two-post interval.Guardian wrote:I would be -- if xyzzy is lynched and comes up scum.
It makes no sense to analyze the swingassuming he could be scum, if he is in fact not scum.
GAH. Does anyone else completely NOT see Setael-scum saying this about Guardian-town and Rishi-town? I could see her saying it about Guardian-town and Rishi-scum, but from my POV, if Rishi is not her buddy, then she is a good bit more likely town from that phrase.If I'm lynched, at least it'll serve to cast a little light on Guardian and Rishi.
You don't think there is anything we can conclusively draw from mneme - others interactions?Bookitty wrote:His interactions with Mneme were inconclusive (as is most everything about Mneme, I think)
Rishi in 597 wrote:I actually agree thatsome of Guardian's logic is a little weak, but the problem with JDodge is that he is almost unreadable. If JDodge is the last scum, he's fairly dangerous.
ButI'm still not interested in lynching {Jdodge} today. I'm more inclined to go for Bookitty or Sikario8.
How are you agreeing with Rishi?Shanba in 598 wrote:Agreed with Rishi here. Actually, Unvote Vote: Jdodge. I don't think Bookitty is the play and I have a strong town read on Jack and I'm getting a town read on Rishi now too.
He seems to both be joining the strongest available wagon, and has little original thought in doing so. Also, even in describing what reasons he is borrowing from others to vote, I don't think he is using the stronger ones.JDodge wrote:Explain iffy.Guardian wrote:I think Sikario8's vote was iffy, but Jack's behavior really makes me think that role is town.
This is the best I've ever played as pro-town. Yay . 3 scum in 3 days after I replace in, and I helped all of the lynches.Guardian wrote:Hi all .
vote: mneme.
Somewhat lurkish, and when he comes out from hiding his reasons sound fake.
FOS: xyzzy
He never removed his random vote, and then went with the easy case on dylan.
fos: Jdodge
Unacceptable.