Nos' contradiction is literally a fundamental change in the argument he was making.
But I'm not surprised that scum don't want to acknowledge this.
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
Nos' contradiction is literally a fundamental change in the argument he was making.
But I'm not surprised that scum don't want to acknowledge this.
ok, fair enough
and why are you acting as if me questioning something (that probably wouldent have effected my read on you much) is scummy? I wanted an explanation for something a little odd and got it and your acting as if its such a scummy thing.
On another note, Nos is acting like I have a great point when im questioning something minor.
why would you, someone of an unrelated faction not want to acknowledge my super contradiction? Most of the time SKs can't be nightkilled. It's literally in your best interests to lynch me. Why wouldn't you want to acknowledge this as more significant as GL's? You need me to be lynched more than him. You can nightkill him. You don't know if you can nightkill me. So why are you even going to talk about GL's contradiction when the obviously better decision is to blindly follow him, turbolynch me, and nightkill him the proceeding night?
The thing about "But I'm not surprised that scum don't want to acknowledge this." Makes more sense if we're both group scum and you're bussing me, but you're lowkey trying to save me from the noose. Why else would you bother?
why would you, someone of an unrelated faction not want to acknowledge my super contradiction? Most of the time SKs can't be nightkilled. It's literally in your best interests to lynch me. Why wouldn't you want to acknowledge this as more significant as GL's? You need me to be lynched more than him. You can nightkill him. You don't know if you can nightkill me. So why are you even going to talk about GL's contradiction when the obviously better decision is to blindly follow him, turbolynch me, and nightkill him the proceeding night?
I did acknowledge your contradiction, and so did you.
In post 601, 3dicerolling wrote:@Ank - Are you scum/busy/disengaged? You don't seem to be throwing your weight around like in mana khemia.
My activity is a direct reflection of my interest in the gamestate and has very little to no bearing on my alignment. I was much more active in Mana Khemia (and all of my hydra games I don't get bailed on) because having someone I know I work well with and know is the same alignment does huge work towards keeping me invested in the game.
In post 601, 3dicerolling wrote:@Ank - Are you scum/busy/disengaged? You don't seem to be throwing your weight around like in mana khemia.
My activity is a direct reflection of my interest in the gamestate and has very little to no bearing on my alignment. I was much more active in Mana Khemia (and all of my hydra games I don't get bailed on) because having someone I know I work well with and know is the same alignment does huge work towards keeping me invested in the game.
why would you, someone of an unrelated faction not want to acknowledge my super contradiction? Most of the time SKs can't be nightkilled. It's literally in your best interests to lynch me. Why wouldn't you want to acknowledge this as more significant as GL's? You need me to be lynched more than him. You can nightkill him. You don't know if you can nightkill me. So why are you even going to talk about GL's contradiction when the obviously better decision is to blindly follow him, turbolynch me, and nightkill him the proceeding night?
I did acknowledge your contradiction, and so did you.
In post 613, Ranger wrote:Urg. VOTE: Some Random Mafia Player.
I haven't done the research yet, but I don't think I can wrap my head around the game before deadline.
In post 601, 3dicerolling wrote:@Ank - Are you scum/busy/disengaged? You don't seem to be throwing your weight around like in mana khemia.
My activity is a direct reflection of my interest in the gamestate and has very little to no bearing on my alignment. I was much more active in Mana Khemia (and all of my hydra games I don't get bailed on) because having someone I know I work well with and know is the same alignment does huge work towards keeping me invested in the game.
In post 611, 3dicerolling wrote:Do you understand why this can also be seen as smokescreen ank?
I have no idea what you mean by this.
I'm saying that you could be genuinely town and genuinely apathetic, but now adays it seems like scum are using this more and more as an attempt to hide from being noticed.
I'm not saying this is what you are doing, but I'm saying with apathetic people this is always a possibility, and why I try to encourage players not to be apathetic.
In post 613, Ranger wrote:Urg. VOTE: Some Random Mafia Player.
I haven't done the research yet, but I don't think I can wrap my head around the game before deadline.
If you're only concerned about deadline, why srmp who only has 1 vote?
In post 613, Ranger wrote:Urg. VOTE: Some Random Mafia Player.
I haven't done the research yet, but I don't think I can wrap my head around the game before deadline.
In post 613, Ranger wrote:Urg. VOTE: Some Random Mafia Player.
I haven't done the research yet, but I don't think I can wrap my head around the game before deadline.
