⭐ Blitz 20 — How To Be Normal [Game Over]

davesaz · Post Post #34 (isolation #0) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 2:04 pm

VOTE: pisskop
Not voting?

davesaz · Post Post #64 (isolation #1) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 5:21 pm

In post 56, RadiantCowbells wrote:I'm not soft claiming PGO, I'm hard claiming it.

I was going to let it go unclaimed but apparently that's anti-town or some shit so I didn't.

Don't make me hurt you!

It is written somewhere that it's anti-town to not claim PGO? Link plz

davesaz · Post Post #97 (isolation #2) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:48 am

Are day SK normal?
What about a straight day vig who thought he was scum fakeclaiming PGO to explain not getting NK'd?

In retrospect the PGO claim was probably an attempt to get wagoned, then the IC can be revealed and scumhunt off the resulting chaos. But we won't know till postgame.

I most certainly don't like droog acting like this was scum in 86. Can't decide if that's a slip of some kind or if it's just vote worthy whether it's a slip or not.
VOTE: droog

davesaz · Post Post #113 (isolation #3) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:30 am

In post 111, Some Random Mafia Player wrote:
In post 110, 3dicerolling wrote:
In post 109, Some Random Mafia Player wrote:
In post 91, GuiltyLion wrote:
In post 74, Some Random Mafia Player wrote:I know its page 3, but if your going to say this can you at least tell us why you have these reads on them?

Why'd you single out 3dice here when Ranger is giving a full blown unexplained readslist two posts above you?

Xtoxm wagon is not a bad wagon but I like my vanity vote as it stands

I honestly missed that tbh

ranger, explain your reads, and all that on page 3?

Why do you believe it's necessary that ranger or I explain our reads at this point in the game?

because you cant just say someones town/scum with no justification.

There are some people who do really early reads like this so often that it's considered abnormal if they don't. And others for whom it's abnormal to have strong reads in the 1st 20 pages.

davesaz · Post Post #122 (isolation #4) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:27 pm

@MOD: V/LA Friday afternoon through Sunday around noon, MST (UTC-7)

davesaz · Post Post #166 (isolation #5) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:48 pm

Hmm, the deadline is 11:30 my time Sunday. The noon time was a random guess at the time getting home from camping, we break camp much earlier than that. So I'll find a place to get off the road as soon as we get back into cellphone range, that will have my vote in play if needed before deadline.

SRMP seems town though it's pretty weak. I like the motivation of trying to get people to talk and questioning reads. Clearly an experienced player, and wasn't swayed by the quasi-meta argument.
Almost50 and Ranger match what I've seen of them quite recently. Droog also matches from much older games. Granted I haven't experienced their scum games in person, so I can't say it is definitive, but they seem town (also weak).
UNVOTE: droog

It doesn't make me feel good at all to not have a scumread offhand. I'm gonna need to reread.

davesaz · Post Post #168 (isolation #6) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:26 pm

GuiltyLion posts are nothing too memorable, but not objectively bad. Still null

KTthecreeper gets some scum points for pushing on the droog slot for replacing out. Weak scum.

TheBulge asked a decent question, holding pattern till the answer / followup. Weak town but very eligible for a downgrade.

Spiffeh didn't engage at all which is troubling. I'm gonna call the active prod dodging scummy and see what happens.

VOTE: Spiffeh

Pedit: mustn't forget pisskop. We disagree on the setup thoughts, but I'd suspect him if we agreed. Town for now.

davesaz · Post Post #169 (isolation #7) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:46 pm

Has anyone seen 3dicerolling as scum? That reaction to Almost50's post is a lot different than anything I noticed in my most recent game with 3dice where he was town.

davesaz · Post Post #182 (isolation #8) » Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:52 am

Running out of voting options is a weird thing to say, please elaborate.

davesaz · Post Post #470 (isolation #9) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:57 am

Interesting typo.

davesaz · Post Post #471 (isolation #10) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 11:58 am

In post 463, pisskop wrote:gdi bbt

Is BBT here

davesaz · Post Post #472 (isolation #11) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 12:00 pm

In post 464, Nosferatu wrote:Nice to know scum actually believed 50s bullshit lmao

I skimmed the stuff that happened while I was gone. An interpretation of what you mean by this might help, as I didn't catch whatever it was you're referring to. It was a very quick skim though...

davesaz · Post Post #475 (isolation #12) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 12:18 pm

I was interested in why you're certain Karnage was the scum kill.

davesaz · Post Post #476 (isolation #13) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 12:20 pm

EBWOP mafia kill.

davesaz · Post Post #488 (isolation #14) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 2:02 pm

In post 480, Nosferatu wrote:
In post 475, davesaz wrote:I was interested in why you're certain Karnage was the scum kill.

davesaz wrote:EBWOP mafia kill.

I don't recall saying the kill was by mafia? I said scum?

Nosferatu wrote:Nice to know scum actually believed 50s bullshit lmao

I don't think this specifies who performed a kill other than anti-town vs town?

Also you didn't ask that.

davesaz wrote:
In post 464, Nosferatu wrote:Nice to know scum actually believed 50s bullshit lmao

I skimmed the stuff that happened while I was gone. An interpretation of what you mean by this might help, as I didn't catch whatever it was you're referring to. It was a very quick skim though...

This says nothing about me specifying who made what kill.

Umm, did I miss something? I thought there was only one death.
A town death is bad for town no matter who killed him.
It would actually be better for town if 50 had been right.
It would be even better for town if scum (or sk) had been lynched.

So what the heck is with the gloating?
And why so nervous all of a sudden when I (perhaps incorrectly) interpreted it as you knowing who made the kill?

I think I touched a nerve here, though it was merely a "what happened while I was gone" kind of question.

davesaz · Post Post #489 (isolation #15) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 2:03 pm

In post 481, pisskop wrote:
vote: dave

Aww, and just when events (in particular lack of 2nd kill) have me believing that you're probably town.

davesaz · Post Post #493 (isolation #16) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 2:18 pm

Nah, it's disappointment that he (as likely town) would vote me (as town).