Mini 442 - Beast Wars Mafia Game Over

Aimee · Post Post #800 (ISO) » Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:53 am

JordanA24 wrote:Confused to claim?

(Though he hasn't posted in-game, or indeed on-site, for 5 days)

She said she would have some limited access.

Dusk · Post Post #801 (ISO) » Sat Sep 15, 2007 1:58 pm

Does anybody want to tell me I'm guilty, again?

Dusk · Post Post #802 (ISO) » Sat Sep 15, 2007 2:08 pm

If not I'm going to get this ball rolling and

Vote: Albert

Our RB can block whoever he feels is guilty in the Night. There is probably just one Mafia member left. By process of elimination (trusting Aimee and Jordan to be power pro-town roles, Skruff being cleared, knowing I'm innocent, going with Albert's confession) the last Vok must be Confused. I liked Confused though. It was Primoris who was so suspicious with his bandwagoning of ryan despite saying he liked Ryan and thought ryan was innocent prior to the bandwagon (84). Thus, there being no one else to vote for, I really have no argument for lynching her. So I'd rather go with the obvious choice toDay, lynch Confused once she comes back the next Day, and we block a kill toNight hopefully.

JordanA24 · Post Post #803 (ISO) » Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:23 pm

I'd be fine with lynching Albert, and I RB one of Dusk and Confused and Aimee investigates the other. But only after Confused claims, I think Aimee should investigate who we decide to be most suspicious of Dusk/Confused.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #804 (ISO) » Sun Sep 16, 2007 3:12 am

Its Dusk, obviously.

JordanA24 · Post Post #805 (ISO) » Sun Sep 16, 2007 3:17 am

EDWOP: If Albert is SK, I RB the most suspicious, if Albert is not SK, well, it doesn't matter who gets investigated/RBed out of Dusk/Confused as long as everyone else is telling the truth about their role.

Skruffs · Post Post #806 (ISO) » Sun Sep 16, 2007 3:46 am

Actually, jordan, you should block the most likely scum, and aimee should investigate the other. We want aimee to be alive tomorrow, to confirm her result, and so we want to keep the most likely scum from killing.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #807 (ISO) » Sun Sep 16, 2007 6:20 am

The end...is this what it looks like ?

Skruffs · Post Post #808 (ISO) » Sun Sep 16, 2007 2:21 pm

Definitely both power roles should claim who they are targetting to ensure total success.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #809 (ISO) » Sun Sep 16, 2007 2:22 pm

I'm not the SK, btw. Woulda been cool, though.

JordanA24 · Post Post #810 (ISO) » Mon Sep 17, 2007 5:18 am

So you're a jester?

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #811 (ISO) » Mon Sep 17, 2007 6:11 am

No...vanilla.

JordanA24 · Post Post #812 (ISO) » Mon Sep 17, 2007 6:52 am

Then why claim SK for no good reason?

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #813 (ISO) » Mon Sep 17, 2007 6:59 am

I wanted to draw the real one out. Didn't work.

JordanA24 · Post Post #814 (ISO) » Mon Sep 17, 2007 7:14 am

Why would the real SK claim?

Lowell · Post Post #815 (ISO) » Mon Sep 17, 2007 7:18 am

My mason buddy voted =confused= before he died. So that's good enough for me. He's one of the three choices we have left.

vote =confused=

. Why not.

Skruffs · Post Post #816 (ISO) » Mon Sep 17, 2007 9:54 am

Whatsucks is that lowell isn't cleared.

JordanA24 · Post Post #817 (ISO) » Mon Sep 17, 2007 9:56 am

Has anyone counterclaimed mason?

Dusk · Post Post #818 (ISO) » Mon Sep 17, 2007 10:17 am

I'm sorry. Albert has recently been yelling that it's so obvious that I'm scum.

But Albert you claimed SK to draw out the real SK? I find this hard to believe. The real SK wouldn't come forward because you claim it. IF you weren't the Sk and you did such a thing the town would mistakenly lynch you and the Sk would be safe another day.

Are you being purposely stupid?

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #819 (ISO) » Mon Sep 17, 2007 2:34 pm

I am willing to give myself up for the cause. Even if I'm lynched, there's only two other players of unknown alignment and I'll win anyway...I guess its my way of being overconfident.

Aimee · Post Post #820 (ISO) » Mon Sep 17, 2007 9:55 pm

I say we lynch either Albert or Dusk.

Lowell · Post Post #821 (ISO) » Tue Sep 18, 2007 5:11 am

Wait, you seriously doubt I'm the mason?

Dear god, people, look at ALL the posts from STD and I.

Who brought that up, anyway. I should lynch you.

Lowell · Post Post #822 (ISO) » Tue Sep 18, 2007 5:13 am

Also, you're suggesting the REAL mason is just sitting back.... so that... what, exactly?

I don't even know how to begin to tell you how dumb that is.

Skruffs · Post Post #823 (ISO) » Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:09 pm

No, I'm suggestign that it sucks that neither you or STD breadcrumbed that your aprtner's innocence was guaranteed. I'm not doubting your masonismness, merely your alignment. But I am not going to check it out until other avenues are checked out, first.

Skruffs · Post Post #824 (ISO) » Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:54 am

vote : albert s rampage