Honestly?Albert B. Rampage wrote:Lowell, why would you want a rival bandwagon so close to deadline ?
Cuz I'm bored.
Well at least I got a reason...Lowell wrote:Honestly?Albert B. Rampage wrote:Lowell, why would you want a rival bandwagon so close to deadline ?
Cuz I'm bored.
No reasons given for anything. I'm particularly confused about why Albert is in the innocent section, since Lowell was pretty against him until then.Lowell wrote:Innocent:
Lowell
Albert
STD
Jordan
Potentially Not Innocent:
Aimee
Dusk
=Confused=
Sweenytodd
TrustGossip
He paints quite a scummy picture of TG, and yet, on his final scumlist, he puts TG...Sweeny wrote:TrustGossip: I don't mind the pressure on Trust, I feel like he has slid under the radar thus far... I have liked his analysis of the game to this point, though I can see Confused's issue with fence-sitting... The one play which I didn't like was his end-of-day jump on Ryan. It seemed overly definative when I don't believe the evidence supported it...
4th. Doesn't fit to me. He put this...Sweeny wrote:Aimee
STD
Jordan
TrustGossip
...before TG, which seemed scummier to you from that analysis, me or TG?Sweeny wrote:JordanA24: Claimed RB, still un-confirmed. Seems to have backed off of his D1 play an awful lot, going from this:to this:JordanA24 wrote:
I've already posted all the evidence that there is for Lowell being scum, now it's up to the rest of the town to believe me. I'm willing to put my head on the line if Lowell isn't scum.If anything, it seems that D2 has sobered Jordan a bit, he seems more tentative than he was D1. Would like more analysis from him atm, his D2 posts have been a bit lacking in content (I know, pot calling kettle black... bite me).JordanA24 wrote:
TG, if you've been reading recently, you'd realise that I now think Lowell to be protown.
Yeah, well, there might be a Maximal/Predicon SK, but the Vok are the main scum.Aimee wrote:Just to confirm, the Voks are the enemies?
And the Maximals are all good?
I agree with Aimee that there is no need to be quick with our lynch today. I'm still thinking TG is the scummiest but it's been awhile since I've read this game. Gonna have to look back though what happened yesterday.JordanA24 wrote:Couple that with how scummy TG has been anyway, I'm 99% sure that TG is our last scum. If we're quick, we can save the mod the trouble of finding a replacement.
I have a huge problem with this post. Aimee flatters Sweeny and showers him with all the compliments in the world, and couples her "doubts" with really bad arguments.Aimee wrote:5. Sweenytodd
Sweeny is someone who has been, for many people, including myself, seen as highly pro-town. I know several players like this, and the way they act so pro-town ends up making them unreadable. So, I'm going to be delving a bit deeper into his posts to try and spot anything even remotely scummy.
First up is his opening analysis.As expected, it's pretty flawless - lots of good points. I agree with every single point he makes in this post, which definitely gives me confidence that we are on the same wavelength. Despite this, I don't exactly like his conclusion:
I get an odd feeling here - most players he basically feels are neutral,Sweenytodd wrote:I am also suspicious of Teffc but I want to wait on a replacement... Most of Teffc's posts have made little sense to me so maybe another player will have a fresh perspective. I also would like to hear from Jordan about why he is so quick to defend Ryan and what the case is against Lowell, Your post #114 is pretty weak so if there is more of a case please point me to it.
People I feel neutral about are almost everybody... I can't read Albert well with his post restriction which frustrates me, I liked Aimee's summary but would like to see some follow up to it.
Person I feel to be town: Hackerhuck... throughout the game I have read his posts as very strongly town and looking for scum, he is the only one I have a strong feel about...which is quite a non-committal stance*. I'm going to give him plus points for his HackerHuck comment, and minus points for his "I feel neutral about... almost everybody," which has a level of non-committalness that makes me uneasy. I'm also slightly leary of the way he backed down from ryan's pressure concerning sweeny putting him at -2. However, my initial thoughts are that he is incredibly pro-town - I am really nitpicking here.
That said,he is very consistent, and is very helpful, asking good questions and following them up effectively. He makes a case against Teffc and Jordan, and defends Lowell from ryan and Jordan. I agree with all his posts. One thing that worries me is that he hasn't given his thoughts on every player coherently - there's been a lot about ryan, Lowell, Teffc, with less on some of the quieter players (including myself and TG), even though he tends to ask everyone questions.I'm not concerned he was on the Jordan wagon seeing as he justified his suspicions very clearly and concisely.
He was, as Lowell said an early voter of Fraggle, but even at the time I worried that he was sitting back after he voted, which was why I asked him how he felt about it.His response was good and I was reassured.
After being absent for what seems like genuine real-life reasons, he comes back and (finally) gives clear thoughts on each player. I generally agree with his analysis of every player (with the exception of my own and Dusk). I don't really see how not voting for 10 pages is a particularly bad scum-tell - I am genuinely cautious with my vote. I also do not see how Dusk is the most pro-town - even though I think she is pro-town, I would not call her the most pro-town.
So, overall, I find Sweeny to be very pro-town like I expected. Although I have a few minor issues (the way he labelled most players neutrally in his opening analysis, and a few issues with myself and Dusk in his most recent one), I don't really see this as an inherent scumtell.
However, I would not at all clear Sweeny - I've got my eye on him, because as I have said before, people who always appear pro-town like this can become dangerous later, especially if everyone begins to trust them too much. At the moment, I do have no real issues other than the above with Sweeny. I think he is pro-town.