In post 35, Trojan Horse wrote:In post 32, Zachrulez wrote:Are the captains in?
To the best of my knowledge, yes. We don't yet have a 4th, though.
Yep and yep. The fourth is something we need to figure out eventually.
In post 35, Trojan Horse wrote:In post 32, Zachrulez wrote:Are the captains in?
To the best of my knowledge, yes. We don't yet have a 4th, though.
In post 289, Egg wrote:In post 160, Egg wrote:Can you say things like:
FoS Zoraster. My teammate mith thinks you are scum and is a better scum hunter than me.
^Still wondering about this. And in case it wasn't obvious, I meant in the game thread.
In post 645, zoraster wrote:In post 638, Glork wrote:zoraster wrote:5. Young and Beautiful were the only team that won all four games. I know it was suggested in the dead thread that something other than wins should determine things, but ultimately any team that is perfect in their games should be eligible for a victory.
As someone who didn't participate (didn't know how cancer treatment would affect my time on site) but followed along, I feel fairly confidently neutral in saying this: This is pretty terrible.
It's been shown long ago that win/loss records don't really correlate in any way to talent/ability or contribution. This is especially true when game imbalance and uneven distribution of factions plays a factor. I never won a paragon based on win/loss record, and though I haven't tallied my raw statistics in years, I know that at least as of like 2011 I had more town losses than wins. There's something fundamentally wrong with the scoring when a team that did relatively little in their victories happened to be the only team that went 4-0, because their non-teammates carried them to victory four times. The idea that overall win/loss record should be a major determining factor in Team Mafia is about as backwards as can be.
If there is something "fundamentally wrong" with it, then there is something fundamentally wrong with Team Mafia as a whole. Either we operate under the (perhaps fictional) idea that skill influences wins or we don't. But I'm not having a winner of Team Mafia as a whole be a team that won fewer games than another team. It would be unfair, it would defeat the purpose of Team Mafia, etc. It's one thing to use subjective measures as a tie-breaker. It's another to act as if wins and losses don't matter -- they do.
Ultimately I don't know how much simpler or fairer it can be than this: If you win more mafia games than other teams, you win Team Mafia. Any other standard is unacceptable.
In post 669, zoraster wrote:In post 666, SleepyKrew wrote:In post 664, Zachrulez wrote:Why even play to win if sweeping might not even matter?
are you kidding
I think it's a fair question, particularly for people who feel like their play style isn't particularly valued by others.
In post 746, T-Bone wrote:I don't mean to pick on you Tammy but it's extremely discouraging to continue to see comments about how my team doesn't deserve the win because we didn't try hard enough or didn't work together as a team enough or aren't good enough players because that's all insulting and not true. I gave it my all for the game I played and I know my teammates did too. And we worked hard on this whether it translated well or not.