Open 37 - Crush Nightless (Game Over) before 477

Qman · Post Post #34 (isolation #0) » Mon Jul 23, 2007 12:36 pm

mneme wrote:Oh, and where is Qman?

unvote
vote: Qman

Q, please join us. Or, you know, be lynched.

Heh sorry. Weekends are my "no spare time days"

Hmm. I'm here. I find it odd we already had a L-1.

FoS: Piggy

Qman · Post Post #45 (isolation #1) » Thu Jul 26, 2007 7:20 am

Am I missing something? I thought piggy was l-2 right now.

Mod

votecount please

Qman · Post Post #49 (isolation #2) » Thu Jul 26, 2007 8:44 am

distad wrote:Yeah. I guess I dropped the ball on the math, there. I probably saw yours and mistook it for a vote. Good thing we have a mod for the official count.

That said, Qman, it looks like weekdays are "no spare time days" also!!

finals happen. Not like this game is trucking along at a great speed without me.

Qman · Post Post #67 (isolation #3) » Mon Jul 30, 2007 7:02 am

Battle Mage wrote:I'd like to hear QMan's view on Mneme/Ms Piggy, before we end the day.

Well I'm trying to run over some numbers in my head right now as I post.

I have to agree with Distad/BM, going for an easy lynch of the lyncher (ha) is probably not our best bet. I'm modarately sure we have our lyncher in Piggy, but i'm still not CERTAIN. Lynching a townie would nigh doom us, and I don't think Ms Piggy is behaving like mafia scum, but more like lyncher scum. Best to save her until the mafia is dead.

I'm curious as to why BM only said "obv scum" in his vote for Mneme, I haven't got a real scum vibe from him. (This isn't to say I've got a pro town vibe either, I'm neutral at this point.)

I think pressure on anyone would be a good thing, it might get us more active and our deadline lifted. Being forced into a DL Lynch on page 3 is going to really hurt us.

Qman · Post Post #81 (isolation #4) » Mon Jul 30, 2007 3:53 pm

distad wrote: LOS:
2) Qman (Cpt. Lurker, just sitting there, watching us tie her up)

I coulda sworn I said lynching Piggy was a bad idea today. Or am I just not remembering my post from earlier today correctly? I stated my opinion and YOU chose to string her up, not me, and I'm to blame? ...

Okay....

FoS Distad

Qman · Post Post #82 (isolation #5) » Mon Jul 30, 2007 3:56 pm

pickemgenius wrote: I'll say that Qman is the lyncher, because he wasn't on the townie BW.

And

It makes sense for him not to be on any wagons except his targets.

Understanding you are just putting out ideas, saying I'm the lyncher just because I didn't take part if a mis-lynch is WIFOM.

Qman · Post Post #84 (isolation #6) » Mon Jul 30, 2007 4:11 pm

pickemgenius wrote:
Qman wrote:
pickemgenius wrote: I'll say that Qman is the lyncher, because he wasn't on the townie BW.

And

It makes sense for him not to be on any wagons except his targets.
Understanding you are just putting out ideas, saying I'm the lyncher just because I didn't take part if a mis-lynch is WIFOM.

Yeah... I know...

So like, you don't deny it?

Would you believe me if I did? If I am the lyncher, I wouldn't admit I was. If I'm not the lyncher.... well, same thing. It's a loaded question (Logical fallacy) , and therefore not answerable without damning myself.

Qman · Post Post #95 (isolation #7) » Tue Jul 31, 2007 5:42 pm

distad wrote: And Q-man... saying that lynching Piggy is a bad idea could very much be a scummy move. You (if scum) would know that she wasn't scum and are afraid that she's the target.

So let me get this straight, you are attempting to damn me for saying that lynching someone that ended up town was a bad idea?

Either I'm sitting here watching you string her up or I'm only saying don't lynch her because i'm scum. As you have said I have done both, which is impossible, which one is it really?

Qman · Post Post #96 (isolation #8) » Tue Jul 31, 2007 5:44 pm

pickemgenius wrote:
Qman wrote:
pickemgenius wrote:
Qman wrote:
pickemgenius wrote: I'll say that Qman is the lyncher, because he wasn't on the townie BW.

And

It makes sense for him not to be on any wagons except his targets.
Understanding you are just putting out ideas, saying I'm the lyncher just because I didn't take part if a mis-lynch is WIFOM.

Yeah... I know...

So like, you don't deny it?
Would you believe me if I did? If I am the lyncher, I wouldn't admit I was. If I'm not the lyncher.... well, same thing. It's a loaded question (Logical fallacy) , and therefore not answerable without damning myself.

Yes I probably would. We really can't lynch the lyncher today.

So like... you still don't deny it.

The question isn't loaded.
It's barely a fucking a fucking question.
Yes or No, you have to fucking options to choose from.

I refuse to answer any question in which the asker feels compelled to swear. Sorry.

Qman · Post Post #115 (isolation #9) » Wed Aug 08, 2007 8:49 am

pickemgenius wrote:
distad wrote:It's tempting. But, I won't.

Fine then, i'll do it.

Vote: mneme

diescumdie

I'd also like to see a reasoning.

Qman · Post Post #117 (isolation #10) » Wed Aug 08, 2007 8:59 am

For now, yup.

Qman · Post Post #118 (isolation #11) » Wed Aug 08, 2007 9:11 am

Actually, come to think... Pickem, you seem to be playing really hard at being the lyncher target, when you haven't had anyone really pressing for your lynch, it makes me wonder if you are trying to get ye ol scum to quicklynch your target for the win. it's been 2 days, still no reasoning. I'm starting to think you are trying to duck answering it for a reason.

I would like for distad to explain his case against me more clearly, you are saying that I can't use NOT voting in the mis-lynch as a defense, yet you use that very reasoning to attack me as scum. As far as I've seen this WIFOM is your only voiced reason for suspecting me.

As well you accusing me of sitting by while you all mis-lynched, then when I show I said it was a bad idea (not sitting on my thumbs and sitting by watching), you use that as the basis for your further suspicion. The more I look at it, the fishier it seems.

fos Pick, distad