In post 5396, T S O wrote:Yes, we've got two full scumteams and an x-shot SK! How fair!
Talk to me about boons then, cuz I don't know which is more discomforting: my paranoia about him, or the fact that nobody else seems to be concerned about boons.
In post 5396, T S O wrote:Yes, we've got two full scumteams and an x-shot SK! How fair!
In post 5400, Flubbernugget wrote:In post 5396, T S O wrote:Yes, we've got two full scumteams and an x-shot SK! How fair!
Talk to me about boons then, cuz I don't know which is more discomforting: my paranoia about him, or the fact that nobody else seems to be concerned about boons.
In post 5404, T S O wrote:Nero and me posted like once each, iirc, saying lynches we'd support and wouldn't support. That's about it. You were in it.
In post 5341, Nero Cain wrote:I am not sure if this means TSO is scum or if this is a sign of the apocalypse but I'm slightly leaning the later.
Though it was a lil' odd that he wasarguing that me being in the hood made me scumdespite arguing the former yesterday but *shrugz*
In post 5407, AxleGreaser wrote:In post 5404, T S O wrote:Nero and me posted like once each, iirc, saying lynches we'd support and wouldn't support. That's about it. You were in it.
That description does not to me match what Nero said happened,
so from your POV,
does that match his post, where he says you werearguing a point... but shrugz
In post 5341, Nero Cain wrote:I am not sure if this means TSO is scum or if this is a sign of the apocalypse but I'm slightly leaning the later.
Though it was a lil' odd that he wasarguing that me being in the hood made me scumdespite arguing the former yesterday but *shrugz*
Do you see Nero:"am not sure if this means TSO is scum or if this is a sign of the apocalypse"
as being related to what you say happened TSO "both gave lynches we we'd support and wouldn't support"
Nero in thread post 5341 looks like rhetoric, and keeping options open for voting you.
Do you think whatever happened in the hood and Neros subsequent posts in the thread is towny like extension/follow up of that?
In post 5411, Thor665 wrote:I am amazingly neutral on the whole Axle v. Nero thing - and that sucker feels like it has been going on for days.
Could both of you push your second top scumspect for a while and see if it's more exciting?
In post 5410, Nero Cain wrote:Axle can also scream as much as he wants about me not understanding Beasts role but that doesn't make it so.
In post 5412, AxleGreaser wrote:I suppose I could push you if I really wanted exciting, but Id prefer to push, vote and lynch my best most likely to flip scum suspect.
In post 5412, AxleGreaser wrote:As i recall,
You havent liked (voted) my push on Josh B, how come today?
In post 5420, Boonskiies wrote:I feel Flubber's paranoia towards me without pushing me is scummy.
In post 5399, AxleGreaser wrote:He thinks you may be scum
In post 5422, Nero Cain wrote:In post 5420, Boonskiies wrote:I feel Flubber's paranoia towards me without pushing me is scummy.
This was my exact same reasoning for calling Flub scum earlier but to add to it There IS a min-bandwagon (ok its one vote) so him not joining that because?