In post 3813, AxleGreaser wrote:@Dave
So id still like a response to what you dont like about
3799
Also given recent events, regarding truthiness, I hate to say this but
This post seems to be factually inconsistent with
In post 3784, davesaz wrote:For folks of advancing years like me, it's more like whether we can remember the 1st sentence of an Axle post (or sequence of posts) by the time we reach the end.
this post
In post 3797, davesaz wrote:I do not believe any part of the case on Garmr. How can I make that any plainer?
I don't have a town read on him either.
for you to disagree with every part of the case, you would have to have read every part of the case,
and remember it
So have you read all of the case and remembered more than the first sentence of an Axle post?
if so what was the pro town point of 3784
or how do you know the case is wrong if you cant remember it?
Ah, an easy question. 3784 is a joke about middle aged people, with a second goal of hopefully prodding you to cut down the size to something manageable. (the town motivation is in lowering the volume slightly, and I'm not the only person who suggested that)
Not liking the case is driven more by not liking the posting style. I have a hard time with trusting the 1000 word essays. (possibly an exaggeration, but in which direction
) And I am mistrustful of the really heavily attacking style. Kinda the same reaction I have to Thor's posting, though it is being used in a different way. In academia I'd call it "proof by intimidation". I played with someone on another site who constantly got away as scum by diving into every game as uber town, usually having both the most, and the longest and most aggressive posts. It got to the point that the best scumtell on him was that he didn't get NK'd on N1. He stopped playing after he started getting PL'd every time he lived to D2, and mafia caught on and stopped NKing him..
I think I
might
have said before in this game that I'd pay more attention to that set of evidence if it wasn't you driving it. It's certainly not a new thought on my part, just don't know if I've been open enough with my feelings on the matter to say it.
I don't remember, is Garmr replacing out? If so, is it squicky to you to lynch a position which is pending a replace?