In post 3442, Garmr wrote:tbh the percentages are bs I just say that to inflame my ego. But things that I thought were scummy The iz vote,the shiro push,the quantity of quality argument, the way he way the he defended the people on the wagon and the fact I'm losing interest in this game.
yes the percentages are just an expression of very strong scum read.
You claimed 85% when you wanted to be able to justify a 1v1
So what you mean in pratical term is read
so strong
that you wanted to have 1v1 and commit town to lynching you (who you claim to know are town) or your read.
and you are
even more sure
than that, that Boon is scum
and now on the basis of your reasons you are
even more sure
than that again that Thor is scum?
In post 3418, Garmr wrote:We can deal with boon or axle tomorrow. Thor needs out first.
BTW you list of reasons was slightly longer before.
In post 3418, Garmr wrote:Thors plays here reminds me of that game where me and him were scum buddies. His vote on shiro was bad(so were your reasoning on shiro) and the iza vote is bad.
@Garmr
Provide the actual; details of what posts you read in the thread, and how when you re-analysed it recently, you now found it was even scummier than you first thought.
What were these new insights? specifically.