Hmmm... and has that claim changed your reads on Pere?
In post 2039, Thor665 wrote:
You also still haven't addressed my question about why you said what you said when you voted Pere.
My pressure on you...wasn't much pressure at all, yet you popped like an overripe grape What's up with that?
So, I wasn't the only one who'd noticed that.
In post 2049, T S O wrote:
Because the way the argument inevitably goes is I make my case on Axle, you say I'm wasting my time, we back-and-forth, I lose the argument and end up sheepishly voting Peregrine.
Ohyeahsure.
In post 2053, Muffin wrote:Do you really think "losing our minds" is a fair characterization of what's going on here? Your case was bad and it was called such.
And obviously, if someone considers a case bad = the poster of the case is scum.
I believe in reincarnation. I might have believed this kind of logic a couple of lives before. (I think it was in France, in the late 1930s.)
In post 2053, Muffin wrote:
Okay let's try this a different way. Here is what you need to do to get your "case" taken seriously and to have your posts not be skimmed/ignored. Use the following format, borrowed from someone else earlier in thread:
So far you have failed to show scum motivation, including in the above quote.
How exactly your indoctrinating (and so annoying as if you were living in my country) style backs your read on me?
Please, increase your Double Standard Points by 1.
The rest of your posts are plain Regardless Of Cards.
My time is worth MUCH more than reading your bullshyt.
I do not care if you want to lynch me. I wrote it JUST TO ANNOY YOU, because you think a bit too much of yourself. Put that reversed telescope, which you use to watch your world around and get back to the oven, Muffin-let.
* * * Until you change your style drastically, communication with you is terminated. * * *
In post 2063, Egg wrote:Aneninen wrote:Hephaestus is a lurk-scum, in my opinion. He promises posts all the time but those posts never arrive.
Is there anything specific about him that makes you think he is either lying about being too busy or avoiding catching up because he is scum?/quote]
I've posted about that but this part is obsolete now, because Hephaestus replaced out.
In post 2115, Garmr wrote:
Ane wagon is growing fast shit I must push the counter wagon harder. Come up with reasons latter because I can't think of a reason to push a counter wagon on ane.
Feel free. I told you that I'd be more useful after my flip. Some of you would be in big, big trouble.
And I know right now which players will advocate all over the Masquerade that my lynch will have only referred to my idiotism. But, large games are large. And the posts of a confirmed townie will give a new insight about many things... Unfortunately for you, posts never disappear. (Or at least, I don't think any of you can perform an "erase-and-alter" kind of time magic.)
In post 2125, Slandaar wrote:
In post 2016, Aneninen wrote:
(2) that part about "Goodmorning is scum because she doesn't make mistakes as scum" must have been a joke, but a real life experience from me is that players tend to make joke out of real things just to attenuate their "annoying" thoughts
Don't know what this actually means. Annoying thoughts? I said it that way because it showed how lacklustre GM's reasoning has been this entire game as I can literally post what she has said about her.
Many people in real life tend to make jokes out of things only to obfuscate their real – in many cases assertive, manipulative or even vile – intent. I was talking about this phenomenon. In other words: a kind of joke which sounds like "I know who're scums but I need to find out something useful to persuade others".
In post 2125, Slandaar wrote:
In post 2016, Aneninen wrote:
I still can't see why a player who has never played with Csareo before is scummier because of their interaction with him than another one who has played with Csareo. (And this argument against TSO from me was called weak... yet another double standard)
The way in which they interacted it's not plain because they interacted with Csareo
TSO had a point although went over the top. GM didn't have a point to it.
Care to explain the difference?
In post 2125, Slandaar wrote:
In post 2016, Aneninen wrote:
– I was FoS-ed in another game for using the phrase "derail a wagon" and I was town
So, you know that town can use the term derail a wagon then and yet are accusing me of using it?
Because I've never ever used that expression since then I don't know whether it's important. You may be right here.
In post 2125, Slandaar wrote:
I said that you highlighted those words as terrible which you did. There is no attempt to suggest you said those words.
Still, it was misleading in my opinion.
In post 2125, Slandaar wrote:
In post 2016, Aneninen wrote:
– and the most important part, which, I must admit, an intuition-read, was his nervous reaction to my scumlist. Some calls things like that "reaction tests". But, I've already learnt it: if someone else performs a reaction test, noone bats an eye. If I do the same...
You were not performing a reaction test. You called me scum with some make believe reasons so I called you scum to which you made a terrible case and hung yourself.
Regardless Of Card, 1 pcs.
Hint: as if noone else had ever posted a case which had included intuitive elements. (Also, I bet you hadn't noticed my presence in this game until your name appeared on my scumlist – which included many other names too. That IS the part of the case too.)
In post 2125, Slandaar wrote:
In post 2016, Aneninen wrote:
My posts are misinterpreted, misrepresented or ignored, and used by many for playing the "Regardless Of Card" at me and many are talking AT me instead of talking TO me. It still works in this way: some players ARE interested in focusing on me and make out arguments out of anything to call me scum.
I don't think they have been misinterpreted, misrepresented or ignored.
Many players ARE doing this. Lynch me so that I will be confirmed and after that check my posts and certain players' attitude towards me as well. If I'm misreading you and you aren't scum you'll be surprised. I'm telling you.
The thing you pointed out in your next post made me think about Goodmorning. I'll check that later.
(See, Muffin? I AM willing to give calm and informative answers if someone minds their style.)
________
Hi, Shiro!