In post 1921, Thor665 wrote: In post 1920, goodmorning wrote:Nobody else has made a point that someone hasn't asked them to clarify, besides which I hardly ever question people like that. I love when it happens though, it's great for reading people, getting down into their thought processes and watching them tick.
So you feel good about how everyone else has answered those questions?
Well, primarily the stances that I could be able to question-clarify in this way would be yours on Pere and Anen/Axle on TSO.
I don't want to question you on Pere because I think you'd turn it into an argument, and that would defeat the purpose.
I don't want to question Anen/Axle on TSO because I don't hate myself enough.
It's less me feeling good about people asking and answering and more me having very good reasons not to ask.
In post 1920, goodmorning wrote: In post 1918, Thor665 wrote:@Goodmorning - as long as we're discussing things, I would like to see you analyze the Thor wagon as it currently exists and express your thoughts on its current movement and what you think about it.
If you're asking me for any kind of VCA... I don't do that. If you're asking me to discuss the stated reasoning for each vote on your wagon and whether that looks kosher then I'll ask you to do the same for the Pere wagon.
Just let me know which it is.
I have already done that for the Pere wagon.
Yes, I'd love to see you do it for mine.
Alright, it's on the list. I'm at home all day tomorrow so...
In post 1925, Slandaar wrote: In post 1920, goodmorning wrote:
I wasn't questioning him to win an argument. I was questioning him to clarify his stance on TSO. I wasn't questioning him to build a case on him. I was questioning him to attempt to read him.
If you find this valuable, asking people lots of questions to help attain a read, why have you not done this with anyone else?
The situation has to be right. Also the reasons addressed above.
In post 1920, goodmorning wrote:
You're kidding me. The rolefishing set is aimed at a single newb newb newb player
(who actually tried to rolefish). The second set is thinking of a hypothetical reasonably experienced set of Scum
(who are apparently not taking the "lynch Boonskiies" action).
Of course I'm thinking on different levels - one of them is labelled "Inexperience Challenged."
So, what you actually asked a newbie was: Why would a hypothetical reasonably experienced set of scum try to lynch PR's?
How is a newbie supposed to know what reasonably experienced scum do or don't do?
I don't think that is what you were asking.
...what.
No, I addressed the concept of rolefishing, an event that actually occurred, with a newbie. I addressed the concept of lynching a claimed PR, an event that was purely hypothetical, with you, who are not a newbie. How in the fuck did you get the interpretation you got out of that???
I wasn't. Slandaar is attempting to sow confusion.
@GM, same question, how do you define newbie?
A player who is new.
In post 1937, davesaz wrote:How about something more specific than that. # games? # months? Behavior?
It's pretty hard to be specific, but behaviour, pretty much. Newbishness tends to stick out like a sore thumb.
In post 1986, Muffin wrote:Barring vig, why would a scum player get vigged? Is this gm slipping that she knows thor is town?
No, gm is slipping that she's not 100% confident in a mostly tone-based read. WHAT A SHOCK
If it makes anyone feel better, I stopped reading Anen's and Axle's posts a long time ago. Skim over them but if I'm not mentioned nothing sticks.
Can we notice what Slandaar's done so far? He's tunneled me with theory questions and got into the multiball discussion, neither of which is particularly productive. Someone who thinks he's Town: why?