Assassins in the Palace predates Rebels in the Palace, War in the Palace
I don't know if it predates kingmaker
but in general royals should not say setups based off RITP since it is really based off AITP
reading through rest of your changes, will let you know if i see other issues
When I joined this site, I was a software tester for mobile business applications and the song PokerFace was not yet written by Lady Gaga
Now I test lottery and gambling software as my job. It's funny how my life has turned out. Somewhere a Time Traveler is laughing madly
Its ok I fixed it already. Can't think of any other issues with your changes at the moment
When I joined this site, I was a software tester for mobile business applications and the song PokerFace was not yet written by Lady Gaga
Now I test lottery and gambling software as my job. It's funny how my life has turned out. Somewhere a Time Traveler is laughing madly
How many game need run before an untested game becomes tested?
When I joined this site, I was a software tester for mobile business applications and the song PokerFace was not yet written by Lady Gaga
Now I test lottery and gambling software as my job. It's funny how my life has turned out. Somewhere a Time Traveler is laughing madly
In post 6, PokerFace wrote:How many game need run before an untested game becomes tested?
Ask Llama, I'm waiting on more data from him. Note that many of the setups in "untested"
shouldn't be there according to Llama however I'm still awaiting a list of which ones. I've done what I could with the info I had.
More big edits!
Check it all out here: http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?tit ... _Main_Page
I need a wiki admin to change the main page part that says "Open Setups" and links to the open setup category to this new link and change "Open Setups" to "Setups".
Could somebody go through all the setups pages (or a lot of them) and change them to look reasonable as some are just blocks of text. Look at some of BBmolla's setup pages to get an idea of what looks good and how to do it.
I'm now nearly finished whith the setups area and am planning to do the same with the roles section.
Quick question, instead of making a whole new role for the Hooker, why not just make part of the virgin that if a roleblocker targets her, she is de-virginized? I really don't think it's worth making a new role over.
@thesupertriomusical on Instagram, come see it if you’re in LA area, I wrote it!
In post 20, BBmolla wrote:Quick question, instead of making a whole new role for the Hooker, why not just make part of the virgin that if a roleblocker targets her, she is de-virginized? I really don't think it's worth making a new role over.
The setups section of the wiki is finished up to my liking. Now please keep it organised and tidy this time.
Llama also sent me the setups in trials so I can honestly say all the info in the open setups section is up to date.
I'm going to get started doing the same stuff to the role's section as I did to the setups section. However to get started I will need to sort them all into (better) categories. My thoughts for these are:
Protective: Doctor ect.
Informative: Cop, Stalker ect.
Confirmative: Innocent Child, Mason ect.
Passive: Lightning Rod, Ascetic ect.
Manipulative: Roleblocker ect.
Lynch Based: Lyncher, Jester ect.
Cult Based: Cult Leader, Mentor ect.
First I'd divide all the roles into mafia/town/3rd party and then within those categories they will be sorted into the above sub categories. Does this sound good?
Oppinions or suggestions?