In post 1598, Scripten wrote:In post 1593, AxleGreaser wrote:
1250 is a quote, in the text of the question that I colour coded the same i made a typo and left out "on"
Well I kind of did, or rather guessed, when I looked recently I did not find a post that is clear enough about him backing off.
Also as that *only* backs of an interpretation of a set of three posts that should not from TSO claimed his case was have changed his whole read.
As I said I found the thread weird, and not helped by the number of posts replying without quoting or explicitly referring to what has a point where.
...
What?
Here is post you made
In post 1250, Scripten wrote:Nero Cain wrote:Whats weird about it? Seems like it would be basic logic.
I guess I just don't see the link between the size of the scumteam and whether or not the game has multiple scumteams. (Or are we including SKs in that definition?) Or are there other aspects I'm missing?
Also, time to engage some new peeps.
Aeronaut:You said you'd be back from VL/A yesterday. Any news on that front? I would like to see your thoughts on the various back-and-forths that have been coming around.
AxelGreaser:Do you findTSO backing off on his wagonto be alignment-indicative. If so, which way do you see it moving? Also, hypothetical question. Let's say you had to start a wagon on a player who's not got any votes on them currently. Who would you choose and why?
Boonskiies:You still feeling that Cho vote? I'd like to see you put your vote to use or at least push the person you're voting for. Frankly, I'd like to see Cho actually play the game, fwiw.
The pink words are words you actually said.
When i quoted them I actually quoted them put them in pink, then when referring to the m I copied them but messed up an dleft out the word
That is I typographical error
I never claimed you said things you didnt. I quoted you.
please stop jumping at shadows.