In post 1550, Flubbernugget wrote:If he is more focused on winning the argument what makes you think he would admit a mistake?
He's not particularly trying to win the argument. He's dodging the argument. Frankly, if he would get up in my face and be clear I probably would have town read him more.
In post 1550, Flubbernugget wrote:And either way I see you two arguing about it regardless of alignment, although the argument is more beneficial as scum.
Meh - I don't care because that's an empty comment and should justify you voting Pere as much as voting me, so it is meaningless to this discussion and shows a lack of thought in your actions. Am I wrong?
In post 1555, PeregrineV wrote:1. Your "case" is saying anything I post is scummy. You don't back it up, and apparently don't have to. Go you.
2. And complete lack of counterwagon. This indicates caught scum to you.
3. Not really. Everyone else is town. If you have any scumreads besides me, I've yet to see them. If you've found any associative tells with scum-me, I've yet to see them. You are carefully not calling anyone saying "Pere might not be scum" scummy either.
4. You linked back to your own post, basically convoluted saying that the fact I question you makes me scummy. Go you.
5. I've been pretty frank and forward, all without using Smurf language. You've been tunneling and changing your story and been pretty evasive about pretty much a single sentence I posted.
6. Your "case" is complete and utter garbage, and the fact you
voted me for voting Scripten
should not be lost after my flip.
7. I had a better case in Ikuraga (
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 3#p6092463) but I recognized it's flaws (
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 9#p6096029) because I was town. Yours has been scummed up and while not direct OMGUS, definitely reeks of it.
1. My case isn't that, and it's funny that you think so because other people seem to understand that and FLubber is calling me scummy for *not* doing that, apparently.
2. Functionally, the only counterwagon that exists is the one trying to be formed on me - yes, that indicates scum to me.
3. I do not use associatives Day 1 prior to a flip. You are correct, I am not calling anyone calling you town scum at this point - how shockingly evil of me.
4. This is a shallow and untrue statement with little relation as a response.
5. I have not changed my story - you have claimed I have and I have repeatedly noted that I have not. Why does no one else believe you if this is happening? This is a lie.
6. I voted you for having an empty vote on Scripten - I am willing to live with whatever consequences that brings upon me.
7. ...what? You're calling my vote an OMGUS of you? While also saying that I voted you for voting Scripten? I honestly do not follow this comment.
In post 1557, PeregrineV wrote:5. If I think I'm right, I say so. If I'm scum and think I'm right, I say so. If I'm wrong, then I
probably
say so.
That sounds like lynchable evidence to me