Clearly you haven't looked.spectrumvoid wrote:Simenon: I completely fail to see this 'case for SV very well known'. Lying scum. Consider an OMGUSfos: Simenon
Panzer is also scum.SV isn't scum and the cases are exetremely convoluted and am betting my money on Skruffs and Simenon.
What does that have to do with you calling me lieing scum because you claimed no case existed? You obviously didn't check, and what roles don't have to actually read the game...spectrumvoid wrote:You laid out a case against me... I responded to that case. You didn't respond. Then you and Skruffs have basically been going: SV is scummy! SV is scummy! for the past couple of pages or so...
i did count Skruffs Post 318 as a vote for Simenon... basically, if it's not in a quote box, i'm gonna count it as long as it follows the rest of the rules for a vote... i'm not going to take the time to read the context of each vote to make a determination on the intentions of the voter... obviously if it's in a quote box, i'm not going to count it... also, if Skruffs does not want his vote on Simenon than he canThe Central Scrutinizer wrote:Tricky... mod?
unvote
Mod: I apologise, but I am unable to post on weekends. Let me know if this is a problem.
John: I'd appreciate if you stop bringing up outside stuff. It only makes you appear spammy, and either way it makes you look scummy. Currently, I read you more as a townie with bad play though.
I like IH's case on panzer mainly because of the 'I don't need to explain myself' bit.
I'm not too sure whether TCS stands in my LOS at the moment, since he's pretty much inscrutable most of the time.
I disagree with Simenon on Ripley, and I also don't like the way he's (Simenon) eliminating so many people this early.
Filling up threads with spam is something that I've seen scum do. It's also true (what Ripley said) about players like this not being night-killed. So what Ripley said was not 'the scummiest thing in the thread.'No offense whatsover, but I don't think John's capable of that sophisticated an act at the moment, which is why I'm thinking it's just bad play.
I unvoted because my vote on panzer was random. And at the time I had not considered all the players. Being close-minded = bad.
This game is driving me up the wall. John is annoying the heck out of me: Stop repeatedly explaining dumb things. There's a certain tolerance I have for newbies, but you're fast exceeding that. The only reason why I don't think you're scummy is because I can't see why scum would draw this much attention fairly early game.
mustafa: Welcome, and thanks for replacing in. Care to explain your so-called hunch?
Let's stop right here. Spectrum Void makes a contradiction in her previous posts, first saying john isn't sophisticated enough to make this a scum play, and then saying he's scummy because he's spamming.IH:
Why I think John could be scummy: For spamming.
Why I think John could be not scummy: 1) He's a newbie. 2) I can't see which sane scum would do this, irregardless of whether said scum is a newbie or IC.
With that said though, John's latest post sounds like a classic case of the 'let's move on, let's move on...' syndrome, while repeating his old mistake.
Simenon: For all your previous 'verbosity': why?
Panzer is also not looking good for immediately going after someone for him to 'tell' panzer, when said someone has clearly stated he will be fairly inactive.
I'll try to keep this as unemotional as possible.
John: Why the heck do you keep bringing up your relationship with panzer in real life? TAKE IT OUT NOW. And why the heck do you keep talking about panzer and how he behaves in real life and using it to justify your pathetic defense? Ever heard of children who got raped by predators who behave like nice guys on the 'net?
If you think you're playing badly, DO SOMETHING. You say you'll take it out, but you don't do anything in that post itself. And you say you realise that you're defending panzer based on irrelevant issues, and yet you don't do anything about it? I cut you slack because I assumed you didn't know. Your latest post proves that you obviously know, and yet you're not doing anything about it.
Note to rest: Pissed off as hell because of a dumb newbie who refuses to do anything when I've been so nice about his dumb mistakes, but not voting because John-scum relies on panzer-scum, and directing lynches = bad.
I'll clarify my last post, it's probably unclear due to a lost post. I posted sometime before the crash saying the reason why I wasn't not voting John was because I felt that for John to be scum, panzer had to be scum first. Then I made a post attempting to show that panzer didn't have to be scum for John to be scum. Then after the crash I unvoted.
I'll vouch that I'm in another newbie with Simenon that probably led to the mistake. However, I find it unlikely that Simenon might have mixed the 2 games up. igmeoy: simenon
I kinda disagree with the idea of making classic tells... They're pretty much only applicable in a newbie game. The problem with classic tells is everyone knows that they're classic tells, including scum..
Then again, john is a newbie, so my point is invalid here. I can't see any reason for him to speculate about night actions, unless he's trying to frame Simenon or Skruffs or himself, which doesn't make sense
That makes 2 people who claim they weren't around: TCS and Simenon. I will be looking very closely at the two of them if john turns out scum. In fact... I'll be looking very closely at TCS after this is cleared up:
Since my pressure vote hasn't had any effect: mod: prod mustafa please
Someone else that's been bugging me this game is IH. I've played quite a bit with IH, and this pseudo-lurking playstyle does not jive with IH-town's playstyle (on the rare occasions IH is town, that is.)
A color coded step by step to why spectrumvoid is scum
