Mini 445: Double Mafia (Game over!)

[johhan]

Well... That sucks, 2 doctors killed off on the first night...

[johhan]

Heh. Voting for oneself was supposed to be a cardinal sin in another game i played on here... odd. anyway.

Original Roll String: 2d9

2 9-Sided Dice: (9, 9) = 18

[johhan]

well... odd dice seem to agree with you, Jordan

vote:JordanA24, vote: TonyMontana

[johhan]

Because Undo is voting me twice.

Then refute his allegations, not just slap a couple votes back on him...

FoS: Jordan

for not bothering to try to defend himself.

[johhan]

Unvote: Jordan

I think Jordan's suspicious, but not enough to warrant a lynching at this point.

vote: TM

putting someone at L-1 this early, and with one line of slim logic as your reason, looks bad.

[johhan]

ok... i've got a headache now... can we have a definitive vote count from the

mod?

[johhan]

Yeah, I'm not comfortable hammering Albert when it'd mean only 4 out of us voted for him.

[johhan]

may as well

double unvote

, but i want more discussion on albert

[johhan]

i'm nearly certain that either Albert, Jordan, or both, are scum.... I just don't want a lynch that kills what seems to be good discussion.

[johhan]

forgot to vote- just to try and promote a real majority, not a 4 person lynch, i'm splitting my votes.

vote: Albert, vote: Jordan

[johhan]

Workin with a deadline people.. Tell me why we havent lynched albert b. scumpage yet...

a deadline that's 2 weeks away... i'd give it a few more days before anyone gets too excited.

[johhan]

unvote Jordan, Vote Albert.

At least Jordan's trying at this point. Albert looks too much like scum giving up, though even that would be early...

So, with both prospective Lynchees at L-3, let's see what happens.

[johhan]

I apologize for my mistake- All I can say is that it honestly wasn't intentional. I missed Pinky's single vote on page 7 when i was counting. My intention was to put both of them at an equal number of votes and observe the activity from there. I screwed it up, sorry.

Undo may or may not have meant to hammer Albert, but his lackluster response and regardless, apparent intent to put him at L-1 anyway make him suspicious. I'm not going to double vote him because (by my often inaccurate count) that would put him at L-2, vulnerable to a double vote. I will, however,

vote (1): Undo

[johhan]

By my count, Undo's at 3.

Good, that's what I thought. I still think double votes are generally bad for discussion, since they can lead to lynches with a minority of people wanting it.

[johhan]

Bah! Go town! You can do it!