Mini 432 - RajÔÇÖs Freaktown IV (Raj's Ladies): GAME OVER

[PJ.]

Hey guys, David is sooo damn hot. Anyway, how about a not so random

Vote:Mariyta

.

[PJ.]

It's my eternal grudge against Mariyta. It is essential a vote with no backing at all, to start discussion. At Billy, My name is sweet, it means "Armored Hunter". Now to actually make a more serious vote.

Unvote, Vote:Metatron

[PJ.]

Eh, like ohio state.

[PJ.]

I'm assuming because IH has 0 post.

[PJ.]

IH that is a bad excuse, seeing how RAJ sent out multiple PM's telling people the game started. That same exact thing happened to me and Raj pmed me twice that the game had started. I didn't get the first one due to my inactivity on the site as a whole which is accredited to real life.

In short, that is bullshit IH.

Unvote, IGMEOY: IH

[PJ.]

Wow, another lame excuse. No one enjoys the first few pages of a game but lurking because you "hate" them is scummy because you are hiding from giving information because you dislike the same thing that everyone else dislikes. Mafia games start off slow and are built through the interactions of the players. Those interactions are then analysed and thats how people deceide who is and is not scummy. By avoiding posting, you are purposly hiding information from the town. If no one posted during the first couple of pages then games would never exist.

FoS:Scotmany

[PJ.]

I am also part of that exception Metatron, I know have seven post, 2 less then you.

[PJ.]

BillyTwilight, I never attacked the lurkers for lurking I attacked them for their bulshit excuses for lurking. Lurking is not inherently scummy but when coupled with a terrible reason or a bad reason, it can be looked to as scummy. If Scot had just said, I'm lurking because it is my strategy, I would have nodded and been like as much as I don't like it, I have to live with it. And as you've contradicted yourself, you said that activity gives the town information meaning inactivity withholds it. Then you said that it isn't scummy because scum attack lurkers because they want to seem active. So if lurking is scummy and attacking lurkers is scummy, what should we do? Ignore it? No, their are very few actions that are scummy in and of itself, it is the motivation and the agenda behind the action that makes an action scummy. May I ask why you agree with Scotmany's excuse?


And again to Billy, if everyone lurked during the random stage, would you find that acceptable? The point is lurking is bad form and can be easily used by scum to withhold information.

FoS:BillyTwilight

Still have my eye on Scot and IH.

[PJ.]

Alright, to me IGMEOY and FoS are on the same level, but will try not to yuse them interchangably for now on. Now, to even the score

FoS: IH and Scot

. Alright, the score is tied how it was meant to be. The point that it "was his strategy" would be far better in my eyes because it actually means he is being upfront, when "not liking random stage" seems like an excuse to not post. Alright I never tried to turn it into you supporting lurking, I just felt like your points could have been taking to the level of you contradicting yourself, meaning your points weren't concise. I never ever said lurking was scummy. I said the motivation behind it could make it scummy. Why are you trying to cofuse my points? On top of all the above, most people lurker hunt. Again not inherently scummy, but the motivation behind such things could be interupted as a scummy thing. Both lurking and lurker hunting are not scummy because of the "what" of the action, but can be scummy because of answer to the question "why?"

Now, I believe Logictus is acting incredily scummy right now and I'm with Billy and Scot on this.

Unvote, Vote: Logicticus, Un-FoS:Scot, IGMEOY still: IH

I like Meta's point on IH and I hate everything Log has said since he started being active. For the record therre was nothing to belive about your excuse scot, I just didn't like the excuse. I still dislike and think that IH's excuse is bullshit.

[PJ.]

Why Babyjesus?

[PJ.]

I don't like LL at the moment. I think he could be an SK of sorts, because I think Logiticus is scum WITH IH, making the vote a way to distance each other and LL seems to not care who dies.

[PJ.]

Logicticus is distancing from IH.

[PJ.]

Strong FoS: LawrenceLot and Unvote

. This could trun into a vote I still want my vote on Logiticus, wait

Strong FoS: LL, Vote:Logicticus

This vote could go to LL at the drop of a hat but right now logic has earned it.

[PJ.]

Vote:Lawrence

I like this a lot.

[PJ.]

Because I really don't care beacuse both Logi and LL are scum. Why does it matter which scum we lynch first. I'm positive and will beat life on this. I wish I could double vote.

[PJ.]

Logticus, you are far too scummy and I should have never left my vote of you.

BT, why am I not allowed to have two choices?

Unvote, Vote:Logicticus

[PJ.]

Far too early in the game for a no lynch, but we can lynch scum

Unvote, Vote Lawrencelot

[PJ.]

Scot, you won't be yelled at if LL is town, I will be. Anyone pro-town would realize this. You are probably his scumbuddy trying to pretend that you are a "lucky" townie and hammered scum. If LL is scum my vote is on you.

[PJ.]

I think it was a normal cult leader. I think we are reading far too into this. Cult died first night because he/she probably target a mafia member or was killed my mafia and didn't convert or that person would have also died. So, I'm gonna

Vote:Mariyta

And i would mind if metatron was blacklisted for that stunt up there.

[PJ.]

Nothing condemning or remotly scummy, but your the only living player that got a mod note on their name so I'm assuming you responding to something with something Metatron said. But I wanted to put some attention on you.

[PJ.]

Alright, I wasn't sure what exactly was happpening.

[PJ.]

Unvote, Vote: Scot

Indeed, I should have remembered what I wrote.

[PJ.]

Dude, if you think I'm scum, you're gonna be very surprised.

[PJ.]

Vote:Panzerjager

[PJ.]

Alright, I'm claiming now because it'll help everyone understand. I am a MArtyr meaning I can protect someone from a nightkill, if they were actually targetted I die instead. So, I don't have anyone chalked up as town right now so I've been protecting myself - yes it's allowed - so since i figured I'd eventually die I'd move the game forward and lend the information of Mert is dirty scum to the town.

[PJ.]

opinion.

[PJ.]

It's a hunch of mine.

[PJ.]

Yes, I can target myself but I don't save myself I simply die. Because you HAVE to send in a night action or I'd be sending in no action. I orginally didn't send one it but he said I had to send one in even if that choice was myself. So if one is target by a kill i can sacrifice myself to save them. If it happens to me I figure I stick my hands in the way to try and deflect the bullet but still die.

[PJ.]

Voting myself doesn't do anything but give me the oppurtunity not to protect someone else and potentially die. By choosing myself I simply say "I only want to die if I am targetted" It's an effective way of sending in no choice when you have to send in a choice, know what I mean? I am Katy. I don't have a restriction, but I have to mention a name everyday. That name is David. Anyway, david is still hot. No, restriction on my night choice.

[PJ.]

Billy do you even read the thread? Post 164, and in my last post I meant target myself not vote myself, I should really proofread my posts.

[PJ.]

Unvote

[PJ.]

Because I find everyone beside IH scummy.

[PJ.]

wow, can we lynch now a ranger for being an idiot.

[PJ.]

so since i figured I'd eventually die I'd move the game forward and lend the information of Mert is dirty scum to the town.

[PJ.]

BillyTwilight, I forgot to unvote and I already posted whil I voted my self,dude. I also pointed to the post in which I said it. I have no quote it above.

[PJ.]

and on that note because I keep hitting submit,

Vote:Mert

sorry for triple post.

[PJ.]

Okay,lets see. Martyr myself later or martyr myself now? That is the question.

Unvote, Vote:Panzerjager