The Title Fairy Dances with the Stars-lolz

[mith]

Exactly.

(It does take a bit of time, and I'm working on other things at the moment. But if I think about it, I might do it this weekend.)

[Save The Dragons]

I've changed Quagmire's title temporarily, until a new title is decided on.

I kinda like it the way it is now.

[Mastermind of Sin]

Nominate LuckayLuck for

"I show no Townie Tells"

or

"Shows no Townie Tells"

if the first one is too long.

[jeep]

supercede me? Heh, maybe we didn't bring it over, but I think that the rule said, titles would be assigned whenever mith or I got around to it. But yeah, I didn't get to it when I had some time. I keep forgetting about it until it's too late in the day.

-JEEP

[Thok]

I'm nominating Raging Rabbit for "EmpTyger 2.0"

If you need it explained, take a look at a typical EmpTyger post and a typical Raging Rabbit post.

[Rosso Carne]

I promise I'll come back when I get my title.

You all know you want me back.

[Thok]

I assume Jeep will update titles around the time of the 2006 scummies. Complining about it in thread is likely to discourage Jeep and make the process take longer.

(OK, not really, but you get my point.)

[Rosso Carne]

well hello to you too.

{same old jackass to me thok}

[Raging Rabbit]

I'm nominating Raging Rabbit for "EmpTyger 2.0"

If you need it explained, take a look at a typical EmpTyger post and a typical Raging Rabbit post.

I seriously need to do some reading on that tiger guy.

That said, my dearest Thok, I'd rather capitalize on a different idea of your and go for "Infallible".

[petroleumjelly]

1.) I am against the "Tyger2.0" nomination for various reasons. The one I will state is that I don't think players should be given titles because their playstyle could be seen (on a stretch) to be similar to

another

person's playstyle. Give players title's for things they have done, not for what other players have done.

2.) Also against self-nominations. No "infallible" for RR.

3.) Isn't there a time length players have to be here before receiving nominations? I don't think one month is nearly enough.

[Thok]

The official rule is they must reach Mafia scum status/100 posts in mafia games. Currently there is no time policy. (If I was to add on a time-based condition, I think "must have finished at least one mafia game" is a better condition.)

(Also, I agree that infallible is a horrible title suggestion for RR, and that I'm against self-nominations in general. Now "Fallible" on the other hand ... [/joke])

[IH]

I promise I'll come back when I get my title.

You all know you want me back.

Give the man a fscking title!

[Mr Stoofer]

ChannelDelibird just asked me to replace into Mafia 58 -- in which I am the back-up mod.

Can't think of a suitable one, but that is certainly title-worthy.

[ChannelDelibird]

ChannelDelibird just asked me to replace into Mafia 58 -- in which I am the back-up mod.

Can't think of a suitable one, but that is certainly title-worthy.

[Mr. Flay]

I promise I'll come back when I get my title.

You all know you want me back.

Give the man a fscking title!

We do not negotiate with terrorists.

In other news, something for CD based on that blunder would be excellent. "Sockpuppeteer"?

[EmpTyger]

I am against the "Tyger2.0" nomination for various reasons. The one I will state is that it implies that I can be improved. Though pj’s point is good also.

[Fiasco]

"you're having a party, wanna come?"

[Fiasco]

also, "energizer bunny" for RR.

[Raging Rabbit]

(Also, I agree that infallible is a horrible title suggestion for RR, and that I'm against self-nominations in general. Now "Fallible" on the other hand ... [/joke])

While I'm glad you continue to enjoy joking on my account, I obviously never for a second think myself infallible. It's a joke. May I suggest "Da Infallibe" so it'll be more obvious?

Nay on EmpTyger 2.0, while I so far believe the comparison has some truth in it, its wrong for reasons already stated by others.

Also, nay on "energizer bunny" for two reasons - I won't be anywhere near as active from next week onwards, and I personally don't find it either particularly witty or in tone with my "persona". The energizer bunny really needs his but kicked (Thok, no lame jokes on this one please).

[Mert]

Nominate Raging Rabbit for "Appeal to Ants".

Reference here.

[Raging Rabbit]

Nominate Raging Rabbit for "Appeal to Ants".

Reference here.

Definitely and in all ways YAY, though I'd still kinda rather be "Da Infallible".

[Thok]

Appeal to Ants is cute.

[Mr Stoofer]

I won't be anywhere near as active from next week onwards

REJOICE! REJOICE! REJOICE!

[Thok]

vote Stoofer

[Fiasco]

heh, I was going to nominate PJ for "Appeals to Ants"