YOU WANT TO SEE A CASE? HOWABOUT THIS POST THATS FREAKING AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE
In post 3125, Bacde wrote:In post 3103, Bacde wrote:In post 3065, Bacde wrote:In post 3061, thezmon221 wrote:What kind of posts are you reading? I never implied you're scum. I think you're delusional and useless town.YES!
Town, I saved you. Thank me later. LOL! this is great
He just literally lied because he can't keep track of his opinions that are displayed in his posts. Lets look at this gem right here:
This is Thezmon's argument:In post 3044, thezmon221 wrote:1) You know who doesn't have reads that change after flips (especially two flips)? Scum. Scum doesn't need to change their reads. Your case on Nacho is exactly the same as it was D1: Crap.
1) Bacde does A
2) Scum do A
3 (assumption) Town is much less likely to do A
4) (inference/implication) Bacde is scum
Yet he denies it.
Sheep Bacde. Scumhunting made easy.
--------
Possible Objections: But you inserted the assumption that town is much less likely to do A! Maybe thezmon doesn't actually think that!
Counter-argument: If thezmon actually doesn't have that assumption, then why did he even include the "You know who does A? Scum do A" part of his post? I can't imagine a town making that statement without the intention of implying that I am scum.