Mafia 58: Ready Salted - Game over!

livingod · Post Post #13 (isolation #0) » Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:59 am

No lynch!? Baaad mojo!

vote River

livingod · Post Post #20 (isolation #1) » Sun Jan 28, 2007 8:30 am

I didn't spell if wrong, I simply abbreviated.

You're a townsperson, and I didn't see you on GL. Someone should explain to you why no lynch day one is bad...

livingod · Post Post #21 (isolation #2) » Sun Jan 28, 2007 8:36 am

EBWOP: *it

livingod · Post Post #31 (isolation #3) » Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:51 pm

Twito, Scot's right. You voted for DoS for doing something that you've done two times already, in fact once while voting for DoS. Ironic and hypocritical.

FoS: Twito

.

livingod · Post Post #33 (isolation #4) » Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:55 pm

Take... your... word...

Hmm...
Not a bad idea Mr. Omniscient.

livingod · Post Post #35 (isolation #5) » Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:27 pm

Ahem, I said Omniscient, not Omnipotent.

livingod · Post Post #36 (isolation #6) » Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:27 pm

Learn your latin!

livingod · Post Post #45 (isolation #7) » Sun Jan 28, 2007 9:15 pm

Who's doing what now?

livingod · Post Post #64 (isolation #8) » Mon Jan 29, 2007 12:04 pm

unvote vote DoS

. Baaad mojo.

livingod · Post Post #74 (isolation #9) » Tue Jan 30, 2007 7:54 am

My wagon: I'm not very available at the moment, as can be told with my lurkiness. Finals and a cut up right hand doesn't leave you with much time to play mafia. Anyway, in my third to last post (this being the last) I was distracted by BM's unusual post. Upon asking him to clarify, I decided to personally insult him in Board Game mafia (where we had a whole thing going on) so I clicked submit and went straight to my rant in Theme Park. My next post, quite some time later, was after I had taken my oxycodone and began to look at my games without the "BM is scum!!" mentality and only then had I realized DoS's backtracking.

DoS: Yes, I'm fourth on your wagon, the lynch requirement is ee le ven. That's roughly a third of the requirement. Your vote is simply an OMGUS vote.

BM: What!? There is no wagon on you. Are you scum in this game as well?

livingod · Post Post #81 (isolation #10) » Tue Jan 30, 2007 10:30 am

BM: My last sentence in my post wasn't based on the logic "he seems to be scum there, so he must be scum here." It was more of an outlandish comparison. I.e. don't take it seriously.

livingod · Post Post #101 (isolation #11) » Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:24 am

Who said we were? As you can easily see, we've moved on.

livingod · Post Post #102 (isolation #12) » Wed Jan 31, 2007 11:25 am

EBWOP: My last post was aimed at River

livingod · Post Post #111 (isolation #13) » Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:07 am

Whoa! How did I get such a large group of followers?

River's vote is OMGUS.
Amb and Kelly just want to join the fun.
What about the rest?

livingod · Post Post #113 (isolation #14) » Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:14 am

Yes he is.

livingod · Post Post #117 (isolation #15) » Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:41 am

As for my reason of voting DoS, You're right. I haven't explained it. It could be one of those posts that I thought about yet for some reason didn't post. Anyway, it was your vote on river that kinda seemed wrong. I can't really pinpoint what it is, hence no more of an explanation than "baaad mojo!" It's like when someone looks at you the "wrong" way. Can't really tell why, but just a vibe I got.

livingod · Post Post #119 (isolation #16) » Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:46 am

Hmm, after analyzing my wagon, DoS placed an earned OMGUS vote. Then two wagoned. Then someone added a vote to make it equal to DoS's wagon, then someone else wagoned, then Amb and Kelly wagoned because my wagon was huge. So out of the seven votes, only 3 voted me for a reason other than "let's balance it" or "it's big wagon, join!" or "OMGUS". Kinda hilarious, no really.

Twito: read the post before your last.

livingod · Post Post #121 (isolation #17) » Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:53 am

Oh yea, there's that post! I ignored it because I had addressed it to my wagon. That was the "post I didn't post" I referred to in Post 117. Yes, that also is a factor in my vote. The backtracking I was referring to was the "I support no lynch" "no wait! I DON'T support no lynch" thing.

livingod · Post Post #138 (isolation #18) » Fri Feb 02, 2007 10:31 am

Perhaps because scum are already voting for me?

livingod · Post Post #140 (isolation #19) » Fri Feb 02, 2007 11:00 am

unvote vote Kelly

So now you're "convinced" I'm scum, right? After your last post, if someone votes me, they'll be a good lynch candidate for you if my wagon fails. I.e. You said, "scum, vote for your buddy!" some other guy goes, "hey livingod's scum, i'll vote him" You take a mental note of that. Then, something happens and my wagon disbands. You say, "well, scum thought he would get lynched so they voted him, especially after my post regarding scum tactics. Hey, this guy voted him right after I told scum to vote him! Lynch him!!!111"

All you're accomplishing in your last post is telling people to broaden their range of lynch candidates, so that if my wagon fails, you can just shift the blame to someone else.

livingod · Post Post #155 (isolation #20) » Sat Feb 03, 2007 1:32 am

Whoa, looks who's scum...

livingod · Post Post #156 (isolation #21) » Sat Feb 03, 2007 1:33 am

EBWOP:

Look who's scum...

livingod · Post Post #203 (isolation #22) » Thu Feb 08, 2007 11:27 am

Wow, I think I'm developing a GF tell. Anyway, bah! Go scum!

livingod · Post Post #209 (isolation #23) » Thu Feb 08, 2007 4:08 pm

Amb wrote:Is being lynched that tell?

No, but it gets me lynched. Anyway, I'd better go now.