not sure how serious this was due to the lowercase and lack of punctuation which I usually use when I am joking or being condescending
I have no issues with Rach or her getting a title, but if she gets one for saying the same thing in most of her posts whereas we're not giving Tazaro a title despite
saying the same thing
posting the same pics in most of his posts, I think that's kind of a double standard
I mean I have Taz on my ignore list but I still support his title because posting pics is his thing, the title is funny, and I can link the two together quite easily
In post 1571, animorpherv1 wrote:Please explain to me the difference. If I came up with a good joke for an izak title based off of the fact that he was British, it would encapsulate the most important parts of the title that I see argued:
1) It has a joke in it
2) I think of izak when I think of 'British Scummers'
3) He posts enough to be recognized
honestly if izak was the first person MOST PEOPLE think of when they think of British Scummers, I'd be okay with that title too. the difference is that in your scenario it's just you thinking a title for a scummer is good whereas there's more support for Tazaro's. how many good titles have been shot down because only a few people get it (although, similarly, some have been approved, although those are usually the older titles).
nth Ridiculously Photogenic for Tazaro
since I hadn't yet.