In post 373, Cephrir wrote:
I understand (albeit disagree) if you don't want to give all the reasons for your townreads, but you can't call someone 'confscum' without backing it up...
Are you chainsawing HD now, or are you trying to defend yourself limp-wristedly here?
I was stating a fact. Scumreads require reasons, because you need reasons to get anyone else to believe you, and the point of scumreads is to get them lynched. That's just how it works. Otherwise you're about as useful to the town as Glenn Beck would be.
Contextualized that for ya.
In other news I am apparently scummier than 'confscum'.
I can read, thanks. Keep dodging the question, scumbutt.
Lynch this please.
I don't know what question you're referring to, but I added context because you didn't seem to understand my point. Apparently now you've just decided to ignore it?
In post 377, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:Maybe you should read my post why I explained why I don't want to out all of my reads.
In post 398, Cephrir wrote:
Really? You're already desperate enough to resort to semantics? You realize it's still not okay if all but one of your reads are based on agreeing with you, or actually if any of them are, right?
#Lolcaughtscumarguments
Since not everyone in the game is tunneling me, you're gonna have to actually debunk my arguments rather than laugh at them. Or, just keep standing by yourself in a field yelling about how I'm scum. That's fine too.
<<< I believe these were the quote tags you were looking for. >>>
Last edited by mastin2 on Mon May 06, 2013 3:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
In post 401, Cephrir wrote:I don't know what question you're referring to, but I added context because you didn't seem to understand my point. Apparently now you've just decided to ignore it?
Who is the confscum I didn't give reasons for, HD, or you? And what exactly is your point? That you're an idiot who can't read between the lines?
In post 401, Cephrir wrote:
Since not everyone in the game is tunneling me, you're gonna have to actually debunk my arguments rather than laugh at them. Or, just keep standing by yourself in a field yelling about how I'm scum. That's fine too.
Because you're not confirmed scum. That was rhetoric.
Majiffy can answer for himself, Nacho.
That still doesn't explain his failure to push his apparently preferred Ceph wagon in any sort of productive way so yeah.
In post 73, Red Ryu wrote:Thor is likely scum, or stupid aggro town.
VOTE: Red Ryu
"Oh hey this is either scummy or playstyle IDFK so I'm going to vote Thor anyway!"
Opportunistic as fuck right there
-
It's like you didn't read anything in my interaction with Thor.
Bad post.
Oh trust me you're still a good vote, even after the Thor interaction.
You basically said Thor is being aggressive and this somehow makes him aggressive scum rather than aggressive town arbitrarily.
The 'confscum' in question was HD. I'm gonna do my best to ignore you for a few pages, as I think I've made my position clear enough and I'm sick of arguing about exact wording and how arguments argued with arguments on arguments.
On Ryu: My initial reaction was agreement with HD (that Ryu had voted Thor arbitrarily for what he himself claimed was a dumbtell), but then I went back and read it and the posts after that one were better.
I refer you to my "reading between the lines" statement. I'm going to be busy for the rest of the night, so I don't have time atm to expound on how retarded you are. Maybe Mollie can explain should she take the time to read through our ISO.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 354, Red Ryu wrote:I'm catching up via phone but your saying informed townie can't exist? I've seen this role and been it, why can't he be one. You seem dead certain he can't without asking a single question about his role.
Informed townie where the piece of information given is "there are at least two killing roles" doesn't exist because it's completely fucking useless information. I seriously doubt that it would be involved in any information he was given, but am not sure.
In post 354, Red Ryu wrote:If he is scummy for other reasons tell me why?
Later.
It can't exist because the info is useless?
Hey no. That info is relevant if he is telling the truth.
Vote:Nachomamma8
Let me know if who your mates are sometimee down the road.
