HurriKaty has left the room.
HurriKaty has entered the room.
HurriKaty: OH FOR FUCKS SAKE.
Ok, now that I've got the obligatory joke out of the way, random
I'm trying to figure out the point to this post, but you know what, I just cant do it.milkman wrote:EBWOP:This reason?AngusHutchsky wrote: I am new to the site, but I am not that new to Mafia - been playing a few months. I guess the point I am trying to make isn't making it. Anyway, whether you see my vote as random or not,at least I know why I put it there and so there it will stay.
Or this one?I thought I explained what I meant in my last post.It was a mostly random vote along with the fact that in other games I have played the Mafia likes to play dumb.So no, it was not completely random, but it had some randomness mixed in. Sad That doesn't explain it very well, but it's the best I know how.
I was randomly voting based on the attitude of the Mafia in games I have played in the past.
Or both?Everyone else is voting randomly, why are you picking on me? Go be suspicious of someone else's random vote.Plus, in the games I have played on other sites (this is my first on MafiaScum) the Mafia convieniently(sp?) forget how exactly the game goes so they can lurk without being suspicious.
I'm giving you a fair warning from personal experience here.AngusHutchsky wrote:1) I am new on the site, how is that acting dumb?
Please tell me theres some sarcasm in this I'm not getting, because if thats not sucking up to try to save your ass, I dont know what is.AngusHutchsky wrote:Wow, Y, I must compliment you on that last (the longer) post. It helps me understand your vote a lot better, and I must admit I have given you reason to suspect me without even realizing it. I am not Scum, but I can't find a way to argue with your logic...
Aww dammit, am I doing that again?!?!?Y wrote:HurriKaty:We have some posts, but very little and most of them with content we've seen by other players too.
Then stop bitching and just drop out instead of wasting our time and a full page with silly banter.Twito wrote:Btw completely new definition of game-related for me.
I'll add some content when I bother to re-read. Right now I have this game listed as boring.
I've been in Florida and haven't been able to get on and read.Twito wrote:Katy is listed after my reread as scummish and hasn't posted since making it 3 days without posting and all game without content.
*stupid answer to stupid question*Twito wrote: I take that as you are back now. Cool that now you are here. Can we expect a post with content?
You know, even though the bandwagon is on him at this point and this could endanger me.. he's actually right.milkman wrote:I'm voting for you because you had a lot of trouble jumping off the Angus wagon, and this post:
Role fishing always seems scummy to me. I can't see this information helping the town more than it helps scum. In this case, Angus's character is an artist and his role's ability is to draw for the town. If people started claiming other real life characters, then the mafia might have been able to establish roles for those characters.Y wrote:Does any one else has a real life character? Does any one else has an artist?
His character sounds very different than mine and I want to see if we can find any patterns.
Role fishing also gives scum safe claims. Scum can make easy pro-town character claims, if they know there are a multitude of artists or other real life characters in the game.
Dont you think before posting? I usually think about five minutes before posting anything no matter how short it is.Y wrote:Indeed. I made a mistake. This question should be asked much further in the game. As soon as I understood it, I let it go and never mentioned it again.HurriKaty wrote:You know, even though the bandwagon is on him at this point and this could endanger me.. he's actually right.
Apparently this game has become all about what you want now.Zindaras wrote:You're not dead.HurriKaty wrote:Zindaras, must you constantly beat a dead horse?
I have already stated that I wish to know your opinions.You said you wouldn't, because then you'd just be echoing others. That is entirely irrelevant, as that'd mean that nobody would ever be able to agree with someone else.You still haven't given anything remotely resembling what I want to see from you.
Scum, yo.
Except that Zindaras's whole attack on me has been one OMGUS. Its just LYNCH KATY LYNCH KATY LYNCH KATY without any contributions to the other discussions that are going on, and he's asking ME for an opinion?ChannelDelibird wrote:I agree that HurriKaty's response to your pressure has been OMGUS, but I do sympathise with her feelings that if she stated her opinions she would be accused of echoing. I have felt the same during this game, although I did in fact post that I wished to echo others' opinions. Katy should at least have done this.Zindaras wrote:OMGUS, too. I am dead set on lynching you because I feel that you are the best bet for scum. You're still avoiding giving any opinion (except, funnily, this one. The funny part is that you said that you didn't want to give opinions because you'd just be echoing others, but now you're voting me, which is hardly echoing anyone else, as you stated you would be doing if you stated your opinions) or even a good reason for your vote.
Not sure where I stand over the issue, frankly. With the deadline soon I might end up voting Katy, but I'd rather we lynched Masterchief.
I didnt see the post. Yes, I know, skimmah skimmah skimmah. I was being retarded.Twito wrote:HurriKaty wrote:I wouldn't be so quick to vote Angus. Perhaps we have a Mafia Roleblocker in the game attempting to frame him? Probably an out there suggestion, but still possible.FoS: HK
He just made up an excuse couple of posts ago why he didn't send the picture. Yeah right.
I hate to just be echoing someone else (again), but its true. After the chance we gave him, I don't see how giving him ANOTHER chance would be benificial to the game, especially seeing how easy it would've been for him to just prove himself night 1.Jack wrote:I think we should just lynch angus. We're just twiddling our thumbs here.
Might as well waiting until tomorrow is giving him another chance to forget, and personally, I dont feel chances should be given out like candy.Zindaras wrote:Because we might as well wait until tomorrow. Angus should presend his role or not forget to send his role in and then it's all fixed again.
Well... to be short.. yes?ChannelDelibird wrote:
In other news, HurriKaty, do you really consider 1 night the only chance we can afford to take on somebody who could be at best a confirmed innocent?
Twito, why did you just intentionally arrest yourself?Twito wrote:Let me put it this way.. nah don't let me.
Because I'm a bad little scummer who wasn't on for like.. a week.Zindaras wrote:Why, for the love of god, did you not free us from this law?HurriKaty wrote:I trust Zindaras for now cuz of that statement.
In terms of
Concordantly
Vis-Ã -vis
Per se
As it were
Y and Twito are clearly the two remaining scumbags.
Vote: Twito(am I already voting him?)
Let me put it this wayHackerHuck wrote:You're begging the question. In terms of blame for this rediculous law, is Hurrikaty the culprit?
Praise fucking jeebus.al_kohaulec wrote:There is a sudden and intense fire that came out of the anger of the gods. This fury has caught the parchment on fire that holds any current laws and all laws have burned away and are now null.
Yes, I'm serious, no more law.
And I strait up told the chat that the night choice I didn't sumbit the night he checked up on me was the Law. I was busy and couldnt check MS, and didnt notice I had it.HackerHuck wrote:I'm not sure why Zindaras thought that Katy was likely town. He indicated that she has some kind of night choice (that was not submitted at least once).