In post 1624, CF Riot wrote:It's late game, I'm tired, I'm kind of just ready to lynch somebody and see what happens.
Meh this is sort of the way I feel too
How about we just lynch zabriel and go from there
In post 1624, CF Riot wrote:It's late game, I'm tired, I'm kind of just ready to lynch somebody and see what happens.
In post 82, Human Destroyer wrote:See, the main reason why his whole playstyle so far has been inherent bullshit is that anyone that is going into a game should check the playerlist to see if there's anyone in there that they absolutely refuse to play with based on playstyle.
Signing up to a game where the first thing you do is going to be "POLICY POLICY POLICY" is inherently anti-town.
Before you say something about playstyle, I don't make generalizations about anyone's playstyle until I feel I have enough experience with them to confidently make such generalizations. So to say someone usually plays in an anti-town manner, I very well expect you to prove it's part of their playstyle and not scummy.
Using that logic, I don't think tigerzone would come into a game like that; he would look to be pro-town. Therefore, I think his zab PL is complete fabrication and he's scum.
P-Edit: No.
P-P-Edit: Ironic that I happened to address that before it happened.
In post 116, theslimer3 wrote:Here's a proposition for an easy game.
Each day we all have an ability. Those who don't are, well, the scum.
A mass claim wouldn't be stupid, in fact it would draw out scum immediately due to roles. But if we want this game to drag out and more interesting, we could just wait till lylo
In post 123, Mitillos wrote:Because that seems like a horribly convenient thing for them to say, to not participate in scumhunting and bus each other at the same time. Have you two done the same thing before in a previous game? That is, each of you attacking the other for "knowing in advance they'll be anti-town"?
In post 146, theslimer3 wrote:No.
In post 195, Mitillos wrote:Anyone who wants to PL tiger for wanting to PL zab is being a hypocrite.
In post 198, ProHawk wrote:Absolutely not. I will stand up for petroliumjelly based on principle alone.
I will vote for tiger the entire game if he isn't lynched today. If N has replacements lined up, I will replace out of the game so I don't ruin town's chances at winning. I have yet to ask for replacement so as to not be a burden on the administrative tasks of this game.
P-EDIT: I never was fine with shrimp accusing you of cheating, and Adam's bullying was not over the top, at least I didn't see it that way. Wisdom has been defending everyone, so I don't find it uncharacteristic that he takes the devils advocate role often.
In post 298, zabriel wrote:Welcome to debate club. Seriously right now.
VOTE: HD
Quit being a lazy ass.
In post 301, Human Destroyer wrote:If this town is actually retarded enough to lynch me, you make it up by lynching Wisdom and mollie, in that order.
In post 462, Mitillos wrote:@Disturbed: I'm not sure that defensiveness and OMGUS aren't null-tells, to be honest. And I'm not sure that HD's scumhunting is sincere.
Also, What CF said. Take it easy guys.
In post 471, zabriel wrote:Why is everybody replacing? You bastards are easier to read when you play the whole game.
In post 565, Mitillos wrote:I'm starting to see the allure of policy lynches...
@Beauty: Alright, fair enough, on the fuzzy/queen side of things. But don't you think that Siv's been too quiet to be scum, rather than null?
In post 1619, Bacde wrote:^^Why does anyone think this guy is town?
In post 1631, CF Riot wrote:Nacho is going to vote Mit and Mit isn't going to vote Mit so we need someone to compromise if we want a hammer.
In post 1646, ProHawk wrote:Mit, get your last post in. The timing of the doc claims makes me say gut that Jalyn was lying, but I may be wrong.
In post 1640, CF Riot wrote:If Mit is town okay. If Mit is scum Nacho is town.
In post 1645, Mitillos wrote:^That was also a very scummy post. If you think I'm scum, you should be voting me, not asking others to vote me first, so you can hammer.