Diffusion of Power (Open 478) over

zabriel · Post Post #50 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:40 pm

If anybody needs to be policy lynched it's tigerzone. That's all I can say without breaking site rules.

Siveure DtTrikyp · Post Post #51 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:41 pm

In post 40, tigerzone wrote:
In post 34, Siveure DtTrikyp wrote:Don't want to lynch zabriel this early.

fuzzybutternut wrote:Really and truly, I don't want to lynch ANYONE this early. Considering, you know, it JUST started.

I would disagree.

Lynching anti-town is not the same as lynching scum. It DOES get to be rather anti-town itself.

Human Destroyer · Post Post #52 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:43 pm

@tigerzone:

I don't like the way you're tunneling him.

If you really thought he was a completely useless player, you wouldn't have signed up in the first place.

This policy lynch looks like something you came up with after getting a scum role PM to justify a tunnel on someone who isn't really scum and go for an easy PL.

Therefore:

VOTE: tigerzone

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #53 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:44 pm

I'm not taking part in Zab's lynch, unless I get some solid info or he literally lurks through the entire game. At that point I think it's more "flying under the radar" than actual lurking.

tigerzone · Post Post #54 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:45 pm

what's even cuter is how you're assuming that i'm thinking that this policy lynch will actually go through, and trying to use the same shaky basis as reasoning as to how i'm scum.

this demands immediate attention.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: HD

Wisdom · Post Post #55 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:47 pm

In post 53, fuzzybutternut wrote:I'm not taking part in Zab's lynch, unless I get some solid info or he literally lurks through the entire game. At that point I think it's more "flying under the radar" than actual lurking.

^The overcautiousness continues.
This is another unnecessary thing to say. It's not like anyone agreed with that policy lynch or even thought that zabriel was lurking in this game.

VOTE: fuzzy

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #56 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:49 pm

I think he was more or less trying to figure out the whole point in Zab's lynch, rather than assume that the lynch was going to go through, though, tbh, you seem like you want it to.

@Wisdom, lol. That's not me being overcautious. I was stating my stance on PL's and disagreeing with it, while also stating that, while I DO disagree with PL's, lurking does become something else after a point.

But it's nice that you think I'm scummy for that. ^^

Human Destroyer · Post Post #57 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:49 pm

In post 5, tigerzone wrote:confirm. let's just get this out of the way as soon as possible, lynch zabriel as soon as the day starts regardless of his alignment thanks

In post 28, tigerzone wrote:that's the most zabriel's going to be posting for about a few days now, please lynch him before he gets back guys.

In post 40, tigerzone wrote:
In post 34, Siveure DtTrikyp wrote:Don't want to lynch zabriel this early.

fuzzybutternut wrote:Really and truly, I don't want to lynch ANYONE this early. Considering, you know, it JUST started.

Looks to me that you do expect this lynch of yours to go through

So that "argument" of yours is quite invalid

Also your OMGUS is very, very transparent

tigerzone · Post Post #58 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:51 pm

you're neglecting the fact that i created a fucking meme to express my thoughts lmao. i came in here WANTING to policy lynch zabriel, but not expecting that it'd actually go through. if it went through, fuck yeah, if it didn't, then whatever.

it's not OMGUS at all, i attached a reason that's stronger than any argument you've yet to put forth.

Human Destroyer · Post Post #59 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:53 pm

Except your reasoning is that my reasoning is shaky.

Which it isn't. It's pretty clear-cut and sturdy.

And remind me, how is this scummier than an iffy policy lynch on a player who hasn't even done anything in-game yet?

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #60 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:53 pm

Zabriel, what's your opinion on all of ^This?

Human Destroyer · Post Post #61 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:55 pm

fuzzy, what is

your

opinion of it?

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #62 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:57 pm

My opinion is that I don't think either of you are going to get anywhere if you keep tunneling on each other like you are.

However, my only reason for asking Zabriel is because I saw him viewing the thread, and, since it was a conversation about him, I thought he might want to share his thoughts.

tigerzone · Post Post #63 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:58 pm

In post 52, Human Destroyer wrote:This policy lynch looks like something you came up with after getting a scum role PM to justify a tunnel on someone who isn't really scum and go for an easy PL.

^that assumes that zabriel is actually going to get PL'd, which we all know wasn't ever going to happen, that's why it's sturdy like you claim it to be.

it's scummier because you're trying to actually come up with a reason as to how i'm scum for wanting a policy lynch on someone. you're trying to get me lynched off of reasoning worth no more than garbage

tigerzone · Post Post #64 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:58 pm

*that's why it's

not

sturdy like you claim it to be

Human Destroyer · Post Post #65 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:00 pm

What matters isn't what happens, it's what you

intend

to happen. Which is a PL of zabriel before he does anything. Which is a scummy and anti-town stance.

Scumhunting 101: It's intent that matters.

Wisdom · Post Post #66 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:00 pm

In post 65, Human Destroyer wrote:What matters isn't what happens, it's what you
intend
to happen. Which is a PL of zabriel before he does anything. Which is a scummy and anti-town stance.

It's anti-town, not necesserily scummy.

Wisdom · Post Post #67 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:01 pm

necessarily*

Human Destroyer · Post Post #68 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:01 pm

It is scummy.

Lynching someone before they say anything is a way to deprive town of information.

That's a scum tactic.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #69 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:02 pm

I don't see it as a necessarily

scummy

stance, but it's certainly anti-town. I can see it as being more of a preference than anything, and not necessarily "oh, this is going to be one easy town to go" kind of thing.

zabriel · Post Post #70 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:07 pm

Tigerzone's meta is anti-town. I'm eager for us to stop being in the same game.

Wisdom · Post Post #71 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:07 pm

In post 68, Human Destroyer wrote:It is scummy.

Lynching someone before they say anything is a way to deprive town of information.

That's a scum tactic.

It's not like zabriel wouldn't have the chance to say

anything

until he gathers 7 votes. I disagree this is a scum tactic.

Wisdom · Post Post #72 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:08 pm

In post 70, zabriel wrote:Tigerzone's meta is anti-town. I'm eager for us to stop being in the same game.

So do you also propose a policy lynch then?

pirate mollie · Post Post #73 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:11 pm

hey wisdom do you want to lynch hd? cos I am thinking I do!

Human Destroyer · Post Post #74 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:12 pm

In post 71, Wisdom wrote:
In post 68, Human Destroyer wrote:It is scummy.

Lynching someone before they say anything is a way to deprive town of information.

That's a scum tactic.

It's not like zabriel wouldn't have the chance to say
anything
until he gathers 7 votes. I disagree this is a scum tactic.

Considering zabriel's playstyle, this is actually very likely what would happen

Really, there's no basis for a policy lynch yet, and it seems to me like tigerzone's looking for an easy lynch. I'm going to repeat this question to everyone:

If tigerzone thought zabriel played in an anti-town manner and disliked playing with him, why would he join a game with him?

P-Edit: Love you too mollie <3

Now tell me why this policy lynch ain't scummy thx