Mini 388: DOOMsville II {Game Over!}

[Falcone]

/confirm

[Falcone]

Falcone, who's the guy in the avatar?

It is actually Giovanni Falcone, an Italian judge who led an investigation on the mafia in the early 90's, and who was killed for it.

Vote: ShadowLurker

Definitely.

I agree.

Vote: ShadowLurker

Nobody is ever "just curious".

Unvote: ShadowLurker
Vote: Ozymandius

Oh, you changed your mind already?

Meh.

I'll stick with SL for the moment.

[Falcone]

So Turbovolver was the first to change their random vote, and immediately got voted by two others.

Ozymandius was the next one to change his random vote, and got voted for it by ShadowLurker.

Very interesting. I'll keep my SL-vote for the moment.

[Falcone]

Why is this interesting?

What I actually meant with the comment was that it seemed strange that there seemed to be three people who thought an early vote change was vote-worthy (Rosso, Mert, SL). The two votes for Turbo could be coincidence, since they didn't came with reasons, but I doubt it.

SL's vote for Ozy definitely was a little suspicious, since the reason behind it ("votehops too much") is BS, while SL apparently intended it as at least a semi-serious vote, hence my vote for SL.

Patrick makes a valid point though, SL didn't mention Turbo who did the exact same thing SL accused Ozy of. However, Turbo is actually right that one shouldn't answer someone's questions for them.

Rosso, please explain why you think Sotty should be lynched.

[Falcone]

Rosso, please explain why you think Sotty should be lynched.

because sotty is scum

Oh, I get it, you're trying to be BJ.

SL, I don't quite get your vote for me. Is it because I used the first thing that was remotely interesting to try and start a discussion, or just because I voted you?

Both possibilities seem like not-so-great reasons for a vote.

[Falcone]

nice false dilemma

Those were honestly the only two possibilities that came to my mind when I read the one line explanation for your vote. My comment was meant more as an invitation to explain your vote than anything else, but if you want to read a false dilemma into it, be my guest.

I also can't help but notice that twice now you have avoided the original issue i.e. your vote on Ozy, by attacking the person who called you out on it.

[Falcone]

SL is acting all over the place, he hasn't made a vote yet that I could agree with, he's evasive when questioned and all in all, he's playing a lot differently than he did at the start of our previous game (where he was town).

In addition, I'm uncomfortable about Rosso, but I need more time to figure out if it's just his attitude I take issue with or that he's really scummy. Although I definitely didn't like his vote for Friday.

Not changing my vote.

[Falcone]

SL, what I meant is that you seem to poke here and there, attacking here and there and changing your vote a lot, to the extent of losing track of it (e.g. the "confirm vote kilmenator" thing).

This could mean nothing, but I get the impression of scum who's trying to seem active, but hesitant to push in a certain direction too much.

And you were being evasive regarding my questions to you - about your (1st) Ozy vote and about you vote on me.

To Turbo: Remember Leper mafia... You thought STD's "passion" was a sign of townieness there too...

To friday: It would be a lot easier to read your posts and understand your points if you'd increase the amount of punctuation in your posts and decrease the amount of insults.

[Falcone]

Here.