Mini 368: Town Of Suspicion - Game over!
-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
Thank you Rosso, the rest of the scum group agress too.Rosso Carne wrote:
thok.al_kohaulec wrote: Rosso? Who should we HAMMAH today?
I'd hammah.
unvoteI wanna be the HAMMAH, not the bandwagon starter.
Ok, CES's third unexplained voteisin fact very suspicious, but in the context in which it was used, I'm going to note it for future reference.
As for PJ and LML, first of all, thanks for giving us discussion so early in the game. Who needs random voting now? I think LML is attacking PJ too much on the topic though, much more than he needs to be, but he has a point in PJ pointing out so publically that he believes there to be only one mafia. IMO you shouldn't speculate on that until after at least one night, and after one night, I don't see speculation on it as a scummy thing to do. Knowing if there's one scum group vs. multiple scum groups can be very helpful. Sometimes you can tell when two players are obviously not of the same alignment. If there's only one scum group, and one of those two are scum, then the other is likely town. If there's multiple scum groups, then that other player could still be scum, just in another group.
That's a biiiig mistake. PJ will back me up on this one. (I sure hope MM isn't a mason.)Thok wrote: MM is doing a Lloyd imitation. I have no idea why.
@PJ's last post
in reference to the random vote part, I think we're already past the random voting stage, we have some good discussion points up now. Besides, his HAMMAH target had 3 votes on him.AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
Ok, LML's latest post makes me feel better about him now. His pointswereover the hill, but the reasoning was good. Trying to make PJ crack under the pressure, which didn't happen.
He also brings up good points on Mith which are true, and I thinkI've seen only one other person point them out so far.AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
Actually that vote of yours was more a point in your favor than a point against you, however, since I'm not able to note that in my notes, I'll probably forget it by the time I can finally open them again. For the most part though, yes it was no indication of alignment.Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:
Oh please, I always prefer a bandwagon vote over a random one. That vote was in no way indicative of my alignment. A fourth vote, maybe, but certainly not the third.al_kohaulec wrote:Ok, CES's third unexplained vote is in fact very suspicious, but in the context in which it was used, I'm going to note it for future reference.
AlsoOMGUS strongest FoS: LmLfor exaggeration and attacking me over my playstyle.
Current scum group guess: Thok, LmL, lurkerAIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
My thoughts on PJ not unvoting.
Like he said, there seemed no reason to unvote, we're at 7 to lynch, so maybe at 4+ votes on Thok, with no reasontovote him, you should be taking votes off, and probably looking at that 4th vote. Thok hadn't given any reason to unvote him, and leaving the vote on requires that he provides some sort of a reason. There also wasn't good reason for somebody else to be voted, so there was no need to be changing his vote anytime soon either.
@Rosso, I too want to know specifically what you're talking about as far as PJ's case against LML. The entire discussion was much more of PJ defending himself against LML than PJ making a case/attacking/whatever against LML.
For those who I can already see will accuse me of being scum with PJ and defending him. I am pointing out arguments for lynching PJ that I don't agree with, and I am pointing out why I don't agree with them. I don't think I should sit idly by while a townie gets lynched for those reasons when I don't agree with them personally.AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
???mith wrote:FOS: al_kohaulec. That was a strangely defensive post, considering what you were "defending" against.EOC: Thok, who thinks there's a lot left to discuss, but doesn't discuss much else other than the deadhorse Lloyd thing.
I want to see at least one more post out of MM before I consider switching; preferably with thoughts on the other players.
Are you referring to my post where I said I had no reason to attack Rosso?
I didn't have anything going for or against me for that, and I didn't think anything would come up with me saying that. Honestly that was mostly a "posting to be posting" post, but I just wanted to say that I didn't find Rosso particular worthy of an attack. I wasn't really defending against anything as there was nothing to defend against.AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
nothing for or against as in, well, I generally thought the entire post would be ignored. It was mostly a comment on his thoughts.
I didn't think people would attack me for saying that.
I didn't think people would stand in awe at me saying that.
I really wasn't expecting any sort of interaction about it at all.AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
When I read M4yhem's post, I was suspicious about him voicing who the three scum were, and then voting Mith. I hadn't at the time noticed that he didn't mention anything on Mith when he did to everybody else. His random vote is, as Mith says, quickly removed to 'appease' Mith. I didn't want to post until he responded to some of the above accusations because even though it looked like it could've been just a joke, the way he formed it still looked scummy and I wanted to hear if he would say whether or not he was joking w/o me influencing him towards saying it.
Then looking over his short review of players, it's mostly all one-liners. It's good that he's voicing his opinion of who he finds scummy and not, but he doesn't have any good reason.
As for who he said was scum, he said me for that 'premptative defense against nothing.' Thok for pushing a point further then it should go when it was something M4yhem considered a 'non-issue.' and finally Ameliaslay for fence sitting.
Until he elaborates on the fence sitting, his case against Amelia is the weakest, and I think his case against Thok is the only one with any good reasoning (but that's all how you interpret my "defense.")AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
1.) I'm explaining my actions. They will be questioned, as they are being now by you. I had no idea how many votes I had until you told me just now. That's not what was important to me. Just like I said in my post, in that quote, if I don't agree with something, I'm not going to sit by and watch it happen, I'm going to do something about it. In the game of mafia, if we see a player we believe to be town, if we sit idly by while he's being attacked, we'll slowly lose the game.M4yhem wrote: Two things bother me about this, Al:
1. Why are you sounding so defensive when only Tyfo has voted you? Guilty conscience?
2. How do you know PJ is a townie?
Vote:Al_Kohaulec
2.) I don'tknowthat he's a townie, but I don't see how any of the arguments I've seen against him hold any relevance towards him being scum.AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
First of all, don't expect too much from me for the rest of this week. I'm busy with college for the most part from 6 in the morning to 11 at night. So ya, I'm cutting deeply into sleeping time here.PJ wrote:Al_Ko: You have been giving your opinions on arguments lately, but not stating who you think is most likely scum. Could you please tell us who you suspect instead of who don't suspect, possibly in the form of a vote?
Anyways, I've been focussing a lot on M4yhem lately, I want to review any previous games he's been in before passing judgement. He really looks like terrible scum right now, but I am trying to figure out if he is just 'a silly townie.' Apparently he's new, so I don't know how many games he's played in before.
LML is questionable, but I'm leaning towards town.
Pooky I haven't heard much from. We miss you Pooky.
Mith is looking a little suspicious, but he's mostly just on my watch list for now.
CES I lean a little more towards town, but he's still on the watch list as he could easily swing the other way.
Rosso I'm finding suspicious in his actions.
I still don't feel I'm ready to place a vote, but if I did, it'd be for M4yhem. If I decided otherwise, my vote would most likely go to Rosso.AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
Ok, thank you very much for this. It doesn't hurt at all just saying you're dead in some games, but still don't talk about it until the game ends. I'll probably look at them, but won't reference them directly (The last game I played had a claimed serial killer get lynched and turn up town, based on what he said outside of the game, you can see how that may affect the in game scenario. Also, basing stuff on that can be difficult for the reason that one may look at that's how the said player plays as town, when he was in fact scum.). I will look over some of those games when I get a chance. Thank you.M4yhem wrote:Al_Kohaulec- I’ve finished two games on this site; both newbies. My side lost in both games. I’m currently in seven others (I think) and have just signed up to play my eighth.
You can see me as scum in mini 362. (I’ve died there but the games still going; it’s alright to mention it, right?) You can see me as town in newbie 260.AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
M4yhem, I was merely curious as to why you put me into the scum category for defending and trying to stop a potential lynch on somebody I found to be town, and you also found him to be town.
Now Rosso is scummy, and I have some things I'd like to comment on some of your stuff, but I'll wait for Rosso to respond first.AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
I think these are my two posts you are talking about.M4yhem wrote:Al_Kohaulec- Do not misrepresent me. I put you in the scum category for preemptively defending yourself not for defending PJ. I know you understood my allegation because you responded to it earlier, so why are you playing dumb now?
As for my guess at your reasoning for defending PJ if you were scum, like I said, I think you were buddying up to him so that you could go "I told you he was town" if he got lynched.
al_kohaulec wrote:Hmm.. interesting, part of my post defending PJ, which M4yhem finds most innocent, next to him, is what makes me the second most scummiest person on his list.
So both explain how I am suspicious because of my post regarding a player you find likely to be town. I think I need more of an explanation from you on what you're looking at.al_kohaulec wrote:M4yhem, I was merely curious as to why you put me into the scum category for defending and trying to stop a potential lynch on somebody I found to be town, and you also found him to be town.
Now Rosso is scummy, and I have some things I'd like to comment on some of your stuff, but I'll wait for Rosso to respond first.AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
My first thought on Rosso's hammering comment was that it was in jest also. But he kept up that 'jest' for quite a while, and after some of the comments from other players, I'm not too sure what I think on that subject, and would like to hear more from Rosso concerning it.Ameliaslay wrote: I have to agree with PJ here, however I think Rosso's willingness to hammer Thok is more in jest than anything.AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
ok, an explanation of my actions you're considering a pre-emptive degense. The overall post I made was generally directed towards reasoning why I thought PJ was town. The latter part of the post was reasoning and explanation for the post. My playstyle involves me using reason and logic, I'm sorry if you don't like it. I just don't see how you find that thing so scummy, and especially so much more so than many of the other players here.M4yhem wrote: Alko- Wow, you did it again. Good job.
Here you seem to know what I mean:al_kohaulec wrote: As for who he said was scum, he said me for that 'premptative defense against nothing.'
Here you misrepresent my case:al_kohaulec wrote:
1.) I'm explaining my actions. They will be questioned, as they are being now by you. I had no idea how many votes I had until you told me just now. That's not what was important to me. Just like I said in my post, in that quote, if I don't agree with something, I'm not going to sit by and watch it happen, I'm going to do something about it. In the game of mafia, if we see a player we believe to be town, if we sit idly by while he's being attacked, we'll slowly lose the game.M4yhem wrote: Two things bother me about this, Al:
1. Why are you sounding so defensive when only Tyfo has voted you? Guilty conscience?
2. How do you know PJ is a townie?
Vote:Al_Kohaulec
2.) I don'tknowthat he's a townie, but I don't see how any of the arguments I've seen against him hold any relevance towards him being scum.
I’m suspicious because you defendedal_kohaulec wrote:M4yhem, I was merely curious as to why you put me into the scum category for defending and trying to stop a potential lynch on somebody I found to be town, and you also found him to be town.yourselfpre-emptively, not cause you defended PJ. Get it?AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
MeMe wrote:Game note:
lordy has yet to respond to either the email or PM I sent out on Friday and, actually, hasn't even logged in to pick up the PM. I plan to give him a full week (about 85 more hours) before assuming he's not coming back and pulling the plug on the game.
I was planning to reread some of the thread today, if I do lordy better come back.AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
Here comes Kelly, to save the day!
Yay!
...Great, now I wish Ihaddone that full reread a couple of days ago. I don't feel as up to it right now... We'll see when I get around to it.
And I understand the modding situation, I'm modding 2, have 2 more coming up, and once a friend leaves I have to take over his game. So feel free to pass it off to somebody else to mod, as long as somebody knows the setup.
*hugs Kelly*AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
I was too honestly, but I just wanted to get out of all my games to actually have time again. I'd rather try to keep this one alive though. But Day 1 has been going on too long IMO.petroleumjelly wrote:Oh, gosh dangit. I was actually hoping this game would be abandoned, it feels like we have gone nowhere in the past few weeks (and having a player absent an entire month is not helping things).
Guess I'll wait for the rest of Thok's response.
I guess now I should find time to do that reread.AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
ok, so I know I've been doing terribly now with everything. I've spent most of my time with mafia lately trying to get Meadow of Sorrow mafia together. I'm going to take M4yhem's suggestion to do the reread in chunks, but I have an exam coming up and some papers to write, so I'll probably have to wait until around Tuesday before I can get into it. I'm sorry for my long delay.AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
My avoidance of a full reread are successful. >_>mith wrote:Logs are still encouraging, don't expect more downtime in the near future.
I've thought about trying to for now just focusing on what's going on from here on out, but when I did that before, it didn't work out too well, so I'm torn between doing that, and waiting another couple of weeks when my quarter ends. Which reminds me, I have to start an essay . But it looks like CES is the lynch today, as eveybody's voicing their intent to vote for him (though not actually voting yet).AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
Just like Mith I found this very peculiar. A reread is always helpful, especially when I have absolutely no idea what's going on now. And here he is implying in his comment that a reread would be a waste of time, and pressures me (and everybody else, but more directly me) to vote for CES, of which for me at the moment would be mostly a bandwagon vote.M4yhem wrote:I didn't really find my reread that helpful. I honestly think our best bet is to lynch, see what the night brings and then take it from there.
I would agree i want to get into night and get the game rolling, but this comment is trying to get us to totally disregard what's happened so far, and I don't like it.AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
I'd hate to be supporting abandoning the game, but I agree that we need to go to night, progress the game. I do not want to see a deadline extension. I honestly don't know/remember why we were voting CES (or whoever), and I'm unsure between Mith and M4yhem. M4yhem I've mostly been unsure of because I can never tell if he's being scummy or if I'm just being annoyed by his playstyle, but I think for now he's my best bet for scum.
Vote: M4yhemAIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
Hmm.. somebody told me not to reread the thread, it's a waste of time. I can't pull up specific examples w/o doing so. I am not implying that the CES wagon has no basis, but that I don't know what it is. But you enjoy twisting my words against me nonetheless.M4yhem wrote:Al_Kohaulec- I read and reread your post, and I still don't see a reason for why you are voting me. You mention my playstyle being annoying, and then talk vaguely about me being scummy without giving any specific examples. Also, I like the way you casually try to derail the CES bandwagon by implying it has no basis while making it look like an aside. A possible connection there? Certainly, if CES were to come up scum I'd be looking more closely at you.
Fos:Al_Kohaulec
Just for the fun of it obv, defensesM4yhem wrote: That's four on me, which along with the modkills puts me in the lead. Would any of those voting me like to hear a defense, or are you just voting for the fun of it?neverhelp anybody. Just keep stalling.
Mith is also high on my suspects list, and I'm very unsure about him too. It was a close call between which of the two of you would be getting my vote, and right now I'm not seeing any reason from you to change it.M4yhem wrote:Al- You are normally quite hesitant to vote (ref: your behaviour re relyte and ces).
So what cast-iron evidence has Mith or my other accusers produced that would lead you to not only vote for me, but also try to insure the deadline stays in place, thus almost guaranteeing my lynch in two days?
Why would you wait until so close to the deadline, if you think it can save you when some people might not be on at that time to change their mind?M4yhem wrote: Meh. I guess I'll claim tomorrow, which seems silly with four votes, but is nessecary, considerin the looming deadline.AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
I think I should start a rule in my personal games about direct questions to the mod in thread.
I don't know whether to think of it as a gambit or honesty. I am thinking M4yhem could be town, but not sure. I have another couple of days to change my mind.
M-Mafia's death doesn't give us the same information a lynch would give us. A lynch gives us the information on yet another player, and with that we can determine more about everybody's interaction with said player, blah blah blah, insert basic lynch argument here. And I'd prefer information in the form of lynches over scumkills. I think more information can be derived from it, and it is meant to bring us closer to our goal.AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
Now remember PJ, as scum I am tricksy, so if I were to be scum you would never find me suspicious. Therefore, since you find me suspicious, I couldn't possibly be scum because I'm tricksy as scum, and if you find me suspicions, I'm not being tricksy and am therefore not scum.petroleumjelly wrote:Actually, here are my top suspects:
1.) Thok
2.) Al_Kohaulec
I have about 3 people vying for spot #3 currently, but Al_Ko and Thok are the scummiest in my eyes by far.
On a serious note, I did not like that hasty bandwagon finishing off M4yhem yesterday, I was seriously pondering switching my vote, and was disappointed to see that day had ended so ubruptly. I want a more clearer explanation from the two who were the last vote on M4yhem yesterday.AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
I didn't like either of them to be honest. The last vote I thought was more suspicious than the second to last one, but I have been too busy to note who they each came from (I'm still trying to prepare for my calc final tomorrow, and I have to wake up at 5 in the morning for it), I only just now, that you pointed it out, realized that the second to last vote is now from a dead player.
I was leaning on changing my vote to Mith as the deadline came closer. I also didn't like it because had they done nothing, M4yhem would've been lynched, save a BIG swing in votes (which has happened many tmies before), and deadline was really close anyways, but even with all the discussion going on, they still went and ended day early, and immediately after his claim. It happened so suddenly I honestly never saw M4yhem's claim, I just saw his role posted in the lynch post. Thok should've allowed us all to be able to look over M4yhem's roleclaim and evaluate it before jumping to a conclusion and killing M4yhem.
As far as the game itself is concerned, I don't know what to think of Thok's role being almost the same, but slightly different then M4yhem. I'm not that familiar with the specifics of these types of minis, but like PJ said, i wasn't expecting the any type of discontinuity like this. I wasn't even expecting a variant of a roleblocker tbh.AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
You're referring to two different people M4yhem.
Anyways, I just realized I have a huge website project I need to finish soon that I haven't even started, and I'm going out of town Tuesday and Wednesday. A brief explanation of my suspicions on M4yhem I was at first I was trying to decide between Mith and M4yhem, like I said yesterday, it seemed like people were leaning towards CES, but I had no idea why, and wasn't finding a reason. For a while I was assuming he'd be the lynch. Anyways, between you and Mith, I was starting to lean towards you, so I started pressuring you to see your response. You respond by calling everybody else attacking you scum, totally ignoring any points made against you, and what really annoyed me was that you started metagaming to prove your innocence (the whole talk about replacing in after being lynched). There was also you implying benefits of a no lynch when you were likely to be lynched and we only had about 2 or 3 days left before night. Furthermore, you said you would roleclaim, and yet you stalled it out for much longer than a townie who intends to roleclaim should.AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
well PJ, if you remember, I had a bad recollection of the game to begin with, and after the board explosion, I really needed to do a reread to know anything. I was really busy (as I had kept saying), and so I was going to wait a couple days before rereading. The day I promised to do a reread, the boards blew up again. I remember somewhere in the middle of everything blowing up, I pretty much bandwagonned with one player against another because of their reasoning, I think it was you I was voting, and I later found out the reason for voting you was bad because it was out of context. Later when I once again had time to do a reread, we were under threat of being abandoned, so why waste my time doing a reread if we're going to abandon the game? Then Kelly comes in and takes over. Tell me PJ, how can I take a definite stance on something or even make an appearance if I have no idea what the hell is going on and can't remember anything that has happened before in the game?
You mean when I premptively defended myself when I was defending you? Well that's because I had to read over everybody's posts before I could attack anybody, and that one preemptive defense was being looked at heavily on me, so that got a lot more attention than anything else I was doing.PJ wrote:Your posts also seem to focus more on preemptive defenses rather than attacking anybody
PJ, why are you not making any specific attacks against me? You say you need to reread the game first? Why do you think I can't make any attacks on anybody?AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
What the hell PJ? You totally missed the point. I tried to make it pretty clear that the reason you were unable to post a decent attack on me was because you did not have the time to dig up my posts at the time. I was trying to get you to put that in perspective with how I've been unable to attack people specifically because I do not have the time to look up posts.petroleumjelly wrote:Don't get sassy with me, Alky: I can't quote specific things because it happened quite a while ago and Iat this momentI do not have time to reread the thread. I have done quite a bit of attacking this game after reading back in the gameprior to this time, and I will get to you in due time. I still think there is much discussion to be had on Thok in particular before I start putting you under a magnifying glass.
Now I really don't feel like trying because there seems to be nobody who doesn't think I'm scum, nobody's going to listen to me, and I have a lot more work I need to be doing besides wasting my time here where my voice will not be heard.
I'll let you guys go ahead and lynch me and bring the scum one step closer to winning this game. If I happen to find time and reason enough to care to post something of content here, maybe I will and maybe somebody will listen, but I doubt it.AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
Wow PJ, I'll give you I've been playing badly this game, and a lot of those are true, but there are a lot still that are taken out of context and false.
For one instance, you say I pushed the CES lynch. I in no way tried pushing it, I merely stated what I saw, which was everybody voicing their scummy opinion on CES. It's like how now there are people voicing their scummy opinions of me, and a few days ago, there were people voicing their scummy opinions of Thok. I did not back it up, I never posted anything against CES, I've even made posts that clearly said I had no idea why people where voting CES.
This is interesting to note from Mith. Mith is trying to cast suspicion on M4yhem II for speculating on scumgroups based on the most likely and thusly assumed setup. It may still be early for speculation, but it feels pretty safe to assume based on the type of game and last night that there is most likely one group of 3 scum. We can use this information to our advantage the way M4y did here:M4yhem wrote:
Nonsense. You admit yourself that three is the most likely setup; and anyway, we’re in the normal games section, aren’t we? It seems like a fair assumption, and I think it’s ridiculous for you to fos me for it, mith.mith wrote:FOS: M4yhem. This reads to me like you are certain there are three scum. Based on what we know, that's probably the mostlikelysetup, but this feels like a slip.
And Mith uses it as an excuse to cast suspicion on M4y, calling it a 'slip.'M4yhem wrote:I think it’s almost definite there was one scum on that wagon, it’s likely there were two, but three would really be pushing it, so the third scum is either someone who pretended to be against lynching me, or someone who was on the sidelines watching.AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
That's you misreading the post. Somebody once said that nobody remembers exactly what was said, everybody just remembers their own meaning of it. Exactly what I typed is there for all to see, and your interpretation is different then my implied meaning, which is "many people are voicing their opinion that CES is scum, and a deadline is coming soon, it looks like CES is going to be lynched." And you consider my observation advocating a lynch that seems to be already prevalent.AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
yes PJ, if I had time to read the thread back then, I would've evaluated posts and tried to come to conclusions.
You have no idea how much I'm holding back my anger right now at you. I've had a very protown feel from you in the beginning, but you are trying so hard to get me lynched because I've struggled to try to figure out what's been going on in this game. I've never deliberately avoided ever trying to reread the thread, except for now, because I see no point. I have attempted to reread on multiple occasions, and the boards blowing up have always screwed that up for me. I did get somewhat of a reread in a couple weeks back. I never got around to actually analyzing any of it, but for what it's worth, this is what I found from my notes on a partial reread.
PJ “randomly” guesses that the scum group is Thok, Machiavellian-Mafia, and mith
PJ also assumes there is only one mafia
LML questions PJ’s motives for speculating publicly that there is only one mafia. Says only mafia would do that. Also says the second vote on Thok (mine being first) was bandwagonish.
PJ explains his actions.
CES places third vote on Thok
LML attacks PJ for trying to hard to know the townie role PM. FoSes CES for voting Thok.
MM votes self, and states you can’t read too far into the role Pms
Rosso answers my question, saying he’d HAMMAH Thok.
PJ refutes LML again, pushes an small attack towards LML as well, says Mith read well into the rules as well but that LML is not using the same argument against him.
LML says it’s too soon to speculate on scum groups.
CES tells LML to vote for Thok
LML explicity states it was a no night discussion before day game, when the mafia could talk for a brief period of time before the game started.
PJ points out that LML conveniently missed the mafia can talk preday rule.
Mith says he would’ve voted CES for his bandwagon third vote on Thok, but is torn between CES and MM’s self vote. Mith questions why PJ never unvoted Thok.
PJ points out that he has no reason to unvote Thok yet. Jokingly speculates that the scum group is Thok, Cogito Ergo Sum, mith
Post # 31AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
The problem is that after... well I don't know when, I believe i was inactive for quite a while and lost touch with the game. After I lost touch, I started to forget, and that is why for the past few months I've been trying to avoid joining games (but did join a couple that I knew would end soon. They've already ended), and have been trying to end every game I've been in. Like you I started to stop caring and hoping for an abandonment. With little memory of what's happened, and little care for the game, I had little to go off of to determine scuminess and such.petroleumjelly wrote:The fact is, in one week, this game will hit thefour month mark. Most mini games would be over by now. Players who have been playing a game for almost four months should have a fair idea of who they think is scummy by that time, even if there has been a month (I will consider that all of November) full of Mafia Scum crashes.
I am more than willing to wait for your analysis, but I do expect to see one (a finished one) soon.
I was not plnaning no making any sort of an analysis before dying, and thought that I had made that clear, but seeing as how it should be my duty to help town, and we are most likely going to be at lylo when tomorrow hits, I guess I'll try to do as good of an analysis as I can. At the very least I'll try to do a brief overview of voting patterns and such.AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
BTW, I'm going to try to do that skim tonight, and as for 3 posts, to be honest, I probably won't find any. I was excited when this game first started to of had so many good players, but was disappointed about not being able to figure out who was likely scum.
Now I'm off to read...AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
Ok... what I've got so far, Mith attacked a lot of people day one, and it seemed more for the intent to lynch rather than the intent to question and such. I'm very suspicious of Mith for how he tried getting so many people lynch.
An interesting thing I noticed with LML (I feel like I or somebody else brought this up before), but when he was pressuring PJ with his questions, the questions were obviously absurd and LML had no grounds to really attack on. His first post after a number of players stated their thoughts that his attacks were too over the top said that he was trying to make PJ 'crack' and to no avail. I find this suspicious in LML, and I haven't played often with him, but I know he has a reputation of being very tricky scum, so I'm very suspicious of him as well.
From what I've read so far, I would be somewhat suspicious of CES as a possible scum player, if he wasn't already dead.
PJ I believe to be town. Rosso (and henceforth his replacement) I believe to be protown, although playing poorly.
Pooky (now M4yhem II) I was getting more town tells than scum, though I haven't read much from him to be sure.
I'm not too sure on the rest yet. But those are some thoughts so far. I know I don't have reasonings attached, but I have a long list of notes of the first few pages that I'll start posting after I finish with day 1. I need to sleep though if you guys don't mind waiting.AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
I've currently got over 3 pages of notes from skimming parts of the thread, I think it would be best to make it public for everybody to see it, but since we don't have spoiler tags on these boards, I have to find a way to avoid it taking up too much space.
Anyways, current thoughts with brief reasoning on some players.
PJis town, but I could be wrong on that. There’s still a weird feeling I get from PJ this game. He's been helpful, he's probed when needed, hasn't overreacted, looks at everybody for any scumtells and whatnot. But like I said, there's something about him that seems different this game, and I'm not too sure what it is. I'm saying town, but could be wron.
LuckayLuck/Rossois town. Rosso went through this game barely here, not caring much. He had little interest, and joked some. He hasn't done anything incredibly scum IMO, and hasn't helped us much either, but I believe his actions show him to be protown.
M4yhem II/Pookyis town. Pooky, while he was here, probed around with good questions. He never attacked somebody for something that was uncalled for, he posed the types of questions that could yield powerful results in finding scum or just more information, and left it open ended enough (didn't give the player a hint to the right answer while asking) so that the one being interrogated would have an easy out.
Mithis scum. Like I said, he attacks just about everybody he can whenever he gets a chance. Pushing for scum tells and interrogation is one thing, pushin to lynch is another. He's quick to jump from attacking one player to another, he doesn't seem to actually 'close' any 'interrogations' on previous players, merely attack the most vulnerable player and head towards a lynch. If he sees that isn't working for him, he heads for somebody else.
Pablito/LMLis scum. Mostly in his first argument towards PJ. If PJ turns up scum, I'd probably think LML was town. Anyways, he was attacking him early in the game for craplogic. He kept pushing consistently and pushing too far. It looked like he was trying too hard to reach for a lynch. As soon as everybody else piped in their opinions on how LML's attacks were uncalled for and unneccessary, LML shrugged it off as a 'test' on PJ.
Thok
TSQ/Ameliaslay
CTD/Tyfo
These three I have no idea on yet, if I'd have to make a guess, I'd probably say TSQ is most likely to be scum, then Thok, then CTD, but I really don't have any idea either way right now, and I'm reading into these three's individual posts right now.AIM account: DolusDeceit [s]not al_kohaulec[/s]-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost
-
-
al_kohaulec Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Tricksy
- Posts: 2235
- Joined: July 15, 2005
- Location: Lost