Mini 373: DOOMsville - Ruined Beyond Repair

[Romanus]

/confirm

[Romanus]

There's just something about a wagon.

Vote: bird

[Romanus]

Bird is playing it cool, I like that. that last post makes sure everyone knows you're not gonna lurk and also shows you care.

Nice, very nice.

UNVOTE

But someone actually tried to push this wagon. I'd like to see some focus on him.

VOTE: Nightfall

[Romanus]

This is the deal. A random wagon doesn't get much direct info, especially a page two random wagon. However, a wagon is the best way to get some sort of meaningful converstaion going. I contructed the wagon by putting the third vote on. I never made any effort to get anyone else onto the wagon, nor did I see any reason to truly lynch bird. Admittedly, the first thing that looked remotely scummy (Nightfall asking for a justification of a OMGUS vote on the wagonned player), I switched my vote. Now we got people taking sides, real sides, not random sides. Only page three and we are into the heart of the game, mission accomplished.

The reason that statement by Nightfall was at least a little scummy is that an OMGUS vote has no reason beyond that. You're voting for someone that attacked/voted for you . Almost like asking for a justification for a random vote. It also seemed that he was really trying to give a little credence to a completely contrived wagon.

[Romanus]

OMGUS: [Oh My God! You Suck!]. Usually used in the context of an 'OMGUS vote' - i.e. a vote for someone purely on the basis that they are voting for you.

The wagonned player refers to Bird, you asked for a justification on Bird's vote on Jerry. It is the only vote on Jerry. I would ask, rather, why are so many people jumping on Bird so soon, are there any good reasons. Except that that is ridiculous. There are no good reasons for the bird wagon.

Voting is not pushing a wagon, it is jumping on. Pushing means actively posting to try and get the wagon to a lynch. Nightfall, you actually tried to raise a case against Bird with your questions. Oportunistic if nothing else.

[Romanus]

Three wagons, this should be fun.

[Romanus]

Wacky is looking a little, well, wacky. His reasonings seem to be very non-committal and throws suspicion around without backing it up.

FOS Wacky

would like to see a

VOTECOUNT

[Romanus]

UNVOTE

Yes, lynching a vanilla townie is better than lynching a power role, and mathematically, logically, etc, betting the odds, Wacky is a pretty good lynch. However, lynching scum is always better than lynching a townie. I don't like that he claimed so early, but he is also 2 from lynch, and if he really is vanilla townie, why not claim. I believe his claim.

Furthermore, that wagon happened way to fast for it not to have some scum on it. My number one candidate as the scum on that wagon is slaking master. A little lurky then jumps on that wagon. I don't like it.

VOTE slaking_master

[Romanus]

Instead, you had me, who had no particular insight into the game, and preferred not to draw attention to himself Day 1.

And a fine job you did.

[Romanus]

Eon, please eloborate

[Romanus]

#1 It is day one, there is no "real" evidence.

#2 As the cop you should be above such comments, such as FOSing a bunch of people for a specific action, especially when there has been good discussion about it.

#3 HackerHuck is the most scummy to me right now, but that is probably because slaking master has dissappeared.

#4

UNVOTE

#5 I was lurking a bit, just didn't see where to jump on or what to talk about, especially after the wagons/claims.

#6 Please do not claim that quickly. Who cares if you are quick lynched. The person with the hammer, if you come up town or not is going to have a lot of splainin' to do.

#7 I am going to vote for HackerHuck without much explination right now. I do have a reason that I will explain, but for now I will keep this to myself.

#8

VOTE HackerHuck

[Romanus]

I plan on revealing, it is in thread stuff, based on his posts, I just don't want to over-influence anything. Also want to know if anyone else genuinely thinks he is scummy.

[Romanus]

I guess he showed us

[Romanus]

Standard Governor role

[Romanus]

We would have won, I mean, town.

[Romanus]

looks like it would have been a pretty cool game

Nice set up MM

[Romanus]

One thing, Hacker, I was using you as a little bait to see if anyone would follow me.

Generally though, you were talking about very townie issues, rather than talking about the game. Generalizing about actions and whether they are pro town or not, kinda giving your opinion without having a real stake on a lot of things. Also, able to cast suspicion where you like.

This is not necessarily scum, but just wanted to see what happened.

[Romanus]

I'd say keep it in the bank and use it later, change the names a little, but yeah, this seemed like it was going to be a good game. We also had a lot of players with not a whole lot of experience, myself included. Some games are just too outrageous with the roles, for inexperienced players anyway. This one had me very interested, and now after seeing the roles, it would have been a lot of fun.

Take some pride in knowing how good a game it would have been.