Cases are anti-town?

This forum is for discussion related to the game.
User avatar
UberNinja
UberNinja
Jekyll and Hyde
User avatar
User avatar
UberNinja
Jekyll and Hyde
Jekyll and Hyde
Posts: 8108
Joined: December 30, 2011

Cases are anti-town?

Post Post #0 (ISO) » Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:16 pm

Post by UberNinja »

Panzerjager brought up the point that chamber thinks cases are scummy, and then chamber comes in and says "wellllll they're anti-town". I disagree entirely, and he won't explain it because he's tired. Somebody convince me of this shit because I am totally incredulous as to how this is even remotely considered valid.
User avatar
Bricktoes
Bricktoes
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Bricktoes
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1106
Joined: July 23, 2011

Post Post #1 (ISO) » Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:22 pm

Post by Bricktoes »

Far end of the anti-walls sentiment? Part of the 'don't tell scum how to act town' thing?
User avatar
Cogito Ergo Sum
Cogito Ergo Sum
YARR!
User avatar
User avatar
Cogito Ergo Sum
YARR!
YARR!
Posts: 11085
Joined: October 29, 2005
Location: Nottingham

Post Post #2 (ISO) » Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:35 pm

Post by Cogito Ergo Sum »

Neither.

The quality of a case on someone tends to depend more on the rhetorical abilities of the player making the case than on the alignment of the player being cased. It's just confirmation biasy yuckiness.
Scumchat is awesome. Yarr!

~"Multiple exclamation marks are a sure sign of a diseased mind."~
User avatar
The Fonz
The Fonz
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
The Fonz
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9014
Joined: April 2, 2007
Location: UK

Post Post #3 (ISO) » Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:47 pm

Post by The Fonz »

In post 1, Bricktoes wrote:Far end of the anti-walls sentiment?


Broadly, this. Plus the idea that town has gut reads, intuitions, and can act impulsively, whereas scum wants to go to painstaking length to show that they have 'good reasons' for acting as they do. The basic premise is that cases rarely actually convince anyone who wasn't going to find the behavior scummy anyway. What they can do is give scum cover for sheeping. You can say in a line or two why you think something's scummy, and people will either agree with you or not. Cases lead to point-by-point rebuttals which lead to point-by-point justifications, which lead to TL/DR.

I subscribe to a milder version of this, in that I think who someone votes for and the timing of it matters far more than any kind of justification they can raise. I'll often vote without any stated reason, in the hope it will cause people to look at my target and figure out for themselves why I suspect them. Most often, though, they just go 'Derp no reasons, that's scummy, vote Fonz.'
User avatar
Korts
Korts
Luddite
User avatar
User avatar
Korts
Luddite
Luddite
Posts: 5752
Joined: January 1, 2008
Location: HUN BUD

Post Post #4 (ISO) » Tue Jun 19, 2012 12:01 am

Post by Korts »

Cases move the discussion into a realm of rationality where players play a game of logic without any definite source material. However deep an analysis might be, it's still just guesswork, and the longer the wall of text is, the more easy it is to lose focus of that single fact.

This is not, in itself, scummy, but it gives scum more room for persuasion.
scumchat never die
User avatar
Vi
Vi
Professor Paragon
User avatar
User avatar
Vi
Professor Paragon
Professor Paragon
Posts: 11768
Joined: June 29, 2008
Location: GMT-5

Post Post #5 (ISO) » Tue Jun 19, 2012 12:06 am

Post by Vi »

The Fonz got to this thread before I could. So, I agree with him (>")>
Everything you say and do matters. People will respond in ways you may never see. May those responses be what you intend.
User avatar
kortul
kortul
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
kortul
Goon
Goon
Posts: 535
Joined: January 24, 2012

Post Post #6 (ISO) » Tue Jun 19, 2012 1:28 am

Post by kortul »

And what do you propose to do to those of us who prefare logic to gut/instincts/etc? For me, gut based (or no explanation) votes are more scummy, than at least some explanation. But i agree that long walls are evil, and i think most players are just skimming them, so making a long case means that most will just ignore it or catch a point or two.

If you make it short, describing main points and maybe hiding evidence in spoilers, it is more likely that the target audience will actually grasp an idea why do you think someone is scum. Even if you do a VCA or something similar, it is still a case, just a specialized.
User avatar
Slaxx
Slaxx
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Slaxx
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7382
Joined: January 1, 2010
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana

Post Post #7 (ISO) » Tue Jun 19, 2012 2:59 am

Post by Slaxx »

I try to make my cases short but I still do them

Idk if I've ever made a case as scum, actually
User avatar
Slaxx
Slaxx
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Slaxx
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7382
Joined: January 1, 2010
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana

Post Post #8 (ISO) » Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:00 am

Post by Slaxx »

If I really haven't that probably makes me a really easy read
User avatar
The Fonz
The Fonz
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
The Fonz
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9014
Joined: April 2, 2007
Location: UK

Post Post #9 (ISO) » Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:17 am

Post by The Fonz »

In post 6, kortul wrote:And what do you propose to do to those of us who prefare logic to gut/instincts/etc? For me, gut based (or no explanation) votes are more scummy, than at least some explanation. But i agree that long walls are evil, and i think most players are just skimming them, so making a long case means that most will just ignore it or catch a point or two.


Well, things aren't scummy 'For you.' They're either scummy or not.

For me, gut-based or unexplained votes always draw more heat relative to ones which are neatly explained, even when the underlying motives aren't any less valid. I feel they are unfairly presented as scummy when they're not.
User avatar
Timeater
Timeater
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Timeater
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4334
Joined: July 10, 2008
Location: Tucson
Contact:

Post Post #10 (ISO) » Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:28 am

Post by Timeater »

The longer a game goes on, the less likely you are to catch scum (thats a true stat homie/proportional to the number of players) - long winded cases dont really contribute to a succinct readable thread, especially when someone's assburgers is flaring up.
watch for the eggshells
User avatar
The Fonz
The Fonz
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
The Fonz
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9014
Joined: April 2, 2007
Location: UK

Post Post #11 (ISO) » Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:35 am

Post by The Fonz »

Also, the longer it goes on, the more likely it is unless you're tunneled that there are several points going either way, so you're better off really just stating what you think the key argument against them is: ie active lurker/slip/every town wagon/weird interaction etc.
User avatar
Yosarian2
Yosarian2
(shrug)
User avatar
User avatar
Yosarian2
(shrug)
(shrug)
Posts: 16394
Joined: March 28, 2005
Location: New Jersey
Happy Scumday!

Post Post #12 (ISO) » Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:37 am

Post by Yosarian2 »

Answer: No.

Next question?
I want us to win just for Yos' inevitable rant alone. -CrashTextDummie
User avatar
The Fonz
The Fonz
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
The Fonz
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9014
Joined: April 2, 2007
Location: UK

Post Post #13 (ISO) » Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:52 am

Post by The Fonz »

In post 12, Yosarian2 wrote:Answer: No.

Next question?


The position itself is too extreme, but it's the most radical form of a reasonable tendency, towards concision.
User avatar
MagnaofIllusion
MagnaofIllusion
has been killed Night 1
User avatar
User avatar
MagnaofIllusion
has been killed Night 1
has been killed Night 1
Posts: 13964
Joined: February 9, 2010
Location: Assimilating the world ...
Contact:

Post Post #14 (ISO) » Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:02 am

Post by MagnaofIllusion »

In post 9, The Fonz wrote:For me, gut-based or unexplained votes always draw more heat relative to ones which are neatly explained, even when the underlying motives aren't any less valid. I feel they are unfairly presented as scummy when they're not.


Here's the thing ... I understand your point but we have two votes.

One with attached reasoning.
One without.

The first can be analyzed for such things as scum intent and how said reasoning melds with other posts by the player.

The second cannot.

While we seem to be on opposite sides of the spectrum as to thinking explanation is a Pro-Town action it is easier for scum to hide their pushes under the second kind of vote and say "I thought it was obvious, draw your own conclusions". Town can do it also but that only enables scum to do the same.
"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"

Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.
Benmage
Benmage
Survivor
Benmage
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 13727
Joined: December 20, 2008

Post Post #15 (ISO) » Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:07 am

Post by Benmage »

In post 3, The Fonz wrote: 'Derp no reasons, that's scummy, vote Fonz.'

Ditto me on this.

DISCLAIMER: Yes excessive walls and quote wars can be detrimental to the game.

That said. I think some back and forth or 'case making' is necesarry.
-For one, not everyone thinks the same way, and enlightening other town members to why XXX is scummy can be beneficial.
-The second aspect on the "scum will sheep wallers"...Well so what? Then analyze how the sheeped. What arguments the found strongest. Why they didn't agree with the opposing arguments. It leads to analyzable reactions and further inquiry.
-"Can create a veil for scum to hide behind" (this being one of the wallers in discussion). Yes, and quite effectively can be ruled out as TvT. This requires the town person to pull out of their tunnelvision and end the war before it becomes to excessive. Once A makes their points, B makes their points (maybe a little rebuttle)... there is THEN little reason to continue a back n forth. Whereas asking the populace their opinions on the matter can yield better information.

-To conclude if everyone only ever rights in 1-2 liners there can be little information attained. Yes I love initial gut reads, and seeing peoples reactions. But its hard to recall how people reacted (or how your gut even felt about them on pg 15 when the games now on pg 115). So imo, it must be a happy median.
"ITT Benmage is making Shakespeare look cool. I need to bring you to my high school." -Vi
"If i must blantantly follow somone a player cannot do better than blindly following benmage" - tubby216
User avatar
Timeater
Timeater
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Timeater
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4334
Joined: July 10, 2008
Location: Tucson
Contact:

Post Post #16 (ISO) » Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:17 am

Post by Timeater »

When someone says "Whats your case, or make a case" - I think thats scummy

When you layout points people can quibble and pettifog endlessly, you aren't doing yourself or the town any favors. I'd rather just write a paragraph or two, aim a well-timed vote that can swing general moods, play to people's weakness, etc. I'm playing to the crowd, not whoever I think is scum. What would I have to discuss with him? I'm not saying close all channels of communication; just dont get involved in back and forths with the guy you think is scum. You dont need to convince him, lol. Finding scum/getting people to vote someone isn't some super logical process. People who tend to make it as such are usually just bad or scum.
watch for the eggshells
User avatar
Timeater
Timeater
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Timeater
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4334
Joined: July 10, 2008
Location: Tucson
Contact:

Post Post #17 (ISO) » Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:20 am

Post by Timeater »

Also;

All reads are gut reads.
watch for the eggshells
User avatar
Umbrage
Umbrage
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Umbrage
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3381
Joined: November 13, 2010

Post Post #18 (ISO) » Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:43 am

Post by Umbrage »

I find players that go out of their way to make a huge detailed case are often scum. The thing about scum is that as scum, everyone has an impulse to show off. Use all the wonderful tricks you have. So when you make a case, you want it to be the biggest, bestest case ever.

In post 17, Timeater wrote:Also;

All reads are gut reads.

dear god please stop posting
I'll explain it to you. You have to get someone else to understand it for you.
User avatar
Zachrulez
Zachrulez
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Zachrulez
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8550
Joined: December 5, 2008
Location: Minnesota

Post Post #19 (ISO) » Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:50 am

Post by Zachrulez »

Games under the accepted meta of case building being pro-town end up like this in the nightmare scenario:

1. 10 page long case made on player.
2. 20 page long case rebuttal. (Where 10 is the response and 10 is the quoted case.)
3. 40 page long rebuttal to the case rebuttal.
4. 3 million page rebuttal to 3.
5. And
6. Back
7. And
8. Forth while the rest of the players in the game become apathetic to the game while no one is able to focus on anything else. Particularly disastrous if the exchange is town v town.

Cases aren't anti-town in themselves, but they can be like anti-town sticks of dynamite just waiting to blow a game into pieces.
User avatar
Timeater
Timeater
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Timeater
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4334
Joined: July 10, 2008
Location: Tucson
Contact:

Post Post #20 (ISO) » Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:57 am

Post by Timeater »

dear god please stop posting


You cant even comprehend what I mean. Autism in action. All we need now is for Junpei to weigh in.
watch for the eggshells
User avatar
Bricktoes
Bricktoes
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Bricktoes
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1106
Joined: July 23, 2011

Post Post #21 (ISO) » Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:27 am

Post by Bricktoes »

All squares are rectangles, but rectangles aren't square.

I read a Thor newbie game where he beat out a player who, rightly, had caugght him as scum basically by dismissing his walls with one liners.
User avatar
SpyreX
SpyreX
POWERFUL WIZARD
User avatar
User avatar
SpyreX
POWERFUL WIZARD
POWERFUL WIZARD
Posts: 18596
Joined: April 24, 2008

Post Post #22 (ISO) » Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:34 am

Post by SpyreX »

Its not that cases are inherently bad but they quickly turn into the ye old squire unfurling his scroll for hours on end - that really misses the point.

A "case" should really just be a summation of those things that are why you think someone is scummy with emphasis on the summation. Talking points make things happen, giant walls don't for the most part.

I'm not a great scum by any stretch but I'd say predominately I've been caught by gut versus "cases".
Show
I always lynch scum... sometimes they're just not mafia. :P

Town: (49-47-1)
Scum: (23-11)
Third Party: (2-0)
Proud member of BaM
User avatar
Timeater
Timeater
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Timeater
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4334
Joined: July 10, 2008
Location: Tucson
Contact:

Post Post #23 (ISO) » Tue Jun 19, 2012 6:21 am

Post by Timeater »

Spyre wrote:I'm not a great scum by any stretch but I'd say predominately I've been caught by gut versus "cases".


Image

oh u.

People think cases should be these Spockian airtight vacuums that perfectly represent why someone is scum. Its kinda silly. I think in a lot of mafia player's minds (on MS) they have this glorified idea of the "case" that can never be lived up to, and yet in vain they desperately claw towards it, hoping one day they might actually make the perfect "case". Unless someone slipped, blatantly lied, has a guilty, whatever - almost every case will have holes. Its apart of the game.
watch for the eggshells
Benmage
Benmage
Survivor
Benmage
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 13727
Joined: December 20, 2008

Post Post #24 (ISO) » Tue Jun 19, 2012 6:32 am

Post by Benmage »

In post 23, Timeater wrote: Unless someone slipped, blatantly lied, has a guilty, whatever - almost every case will have holes. Its apart of the game.

Which brings us to scumhunting. You aren't going to catch a halfway decent scummer in blatant lies, or slips etc. And so 'cases'....or even points against these skilled players will be difficult to establish. And they will refute your 'case' as being altogether weak, or with holes.

Scumhunting is a multitude of many small things that culminate together. (Talking here about: gut, player reaction, VCA, genuineness, existing v trying to win, buddying/distancing/bussing, META, etc etc)
"ITT Benmage is making Shakespeare look cool. I need to bring you to my high school." -Vi
"If i must blantantly follow somone a player cannot do better than blindly following benmage" - tubby216
Post Reply

Return to “Mafia Discussion”