Ethics: Policy Lynchings

[GreenLiquid]

is there something wrong with this? He doesn't defend himself against the minor things, he just says "that's not right" and won't claim. Are we really supposed to let just anyone off because they refuse to claim?

In this case, he was excersizing a no-claim policy for a real reason. If people were using craplogic against him, he was an idiot as he could have pointed the fallacy out. If it was something retarded like if he was first to mention SK and they took it as tell (and he did nothing else), then it was a move I highly encourage because it convinces towns not to blindly force players into claims, esp. for little or no reason.