Ethics: Policy Lynchings

bluesoul · Post Post #2 (isolation #0) » Sat Jun 03, 2006 4:57 pm

viper0933 wrote:It's the towns choice...

And it always seem that I always suck as a town role, but as scum, I have a chance of actually doing well in a game.

Noted.

I think that this is a decent metagame strategy; putting extra pressure on one or two people early that are most likely to be good/bad scum may give a wealth of information in the long run.

bluesoul · Post Post #14 (isolation #1) » Sun Jun 04, 2006 6:38 am

He thinks

punishing

people that refuse to claim is unethical.

bluesoul · Post Post #17 (isolation #2) » Sun Jun 04, 2006 7:44 am

Fiasco wrote:
Yosarian2 wrote:Ummm...you think not claiming is
unethical
???
Not quite... I think it's unethical to have a
metagame policy
not to claim (to deter future bandwagons), one that you adhere to even when it isn't in the town's interest.

Oh. I misunderstood as well, then.

bluesoul · Post Post #25 (isolation #3) » Sun Jun 04, 2006 7:32 pm

In a 2-1-1 endgame the town's essentially SOL anyway, sans a no-lynch.