Mini 325 - The Office ---Game Over

[Adele]

huggle Pooky

, obv

but also...

arbitrary

vote: PookyTheMagicalBear

I don't know if he presents a sufficiently professional appearance.

[Adele]

unvote, vote: Kirbyphreak

(gets it to, what, 5?)

If you're trying a lepton, winter, it won't work. You've guaranteed your sanity - if this comes up as any error other than a "Miller" role reveal, I'll consider you as having come out as scum come morning.

[Adele]

Hey, guys! Sorry for may absence. What's happening?

*reads*

Ah. Right, okay, I see what you did there.

To answer an earlier question, a "lepton" is a ploy whereby scum claim cop, present a guilty investigation of an innocent and, when it comes up innocent, say "oh, whoops, I guess I must be paranoid". That's one of the reasons why cops don't usually come out on Day 1, even with a guilty investiagtion (but instead breadcrumb the guilty party in case they get lynched/nightkilled). So, thanks to Winter for starting this all.

I guess my recourse is to point out that (1) Winter has

guaranteed

her sanity (as I understand it), and that you know have two people claiming that kirby's scum (since I'm innocent, obv), and point to probability; are we supposed to believe that it's as likely that the crazy cop investigated the proper cop while the proper cop investigated scum

and

the crazy cop cam out first, Day 1, than it is that a cop was foolish enough to come out Day 1 and the scum tried a gambit to get an extra day/night (perhaps because he has a one-shot night ability, or perhaps out of desperation and "no downside)?

Of course the latter is more likely, but what you must consider is how

much

more likely it is (since Kirby's claimed that lynching him = lynching cop). It's a shame pm-quoting's disallowed in this game, but I think the next step is to require a name-claim from Kirby; if it's plausible, require one from me. I'll start by claiming

not-cop

(to simplify things) but I'd ask people to bear in mind this isn't the usual cop coming out with a result - before he claimed, his death was assured, and he's been accused himself. He lacks plausibility.

Obv,

confirm vote: Kirby

, and I hope that what I've written makes sense (basically, don't forget / dismiss winter's input and the fact the it preceded Kirby's claim).

[Adele]

Okay. I honestly think you guys are making a mistake; well, obviously I

know

you're making a mistake but I mean that I think that, given the info you have, you're following the wrong play. I think that you're going to lynch me today because it's a better worst case scenario, and I understand, although I think the specifics of the situation mean that the odds counterbalance that issue and then some. Yes, you're making a mistake, but not the stupidest ever. No hard feelings, in this case.

If anything, I'd ask you to once again consider how unlikely it is that the situation fits Kirby's account. No, not impossible, but very unlikely. Ask yourself also, if you were scum in Kirby's situation, what would be the play for you? Put a townie in the line of fire, get them to come out if power and get lynched if not, and resign yourself to getting lynched Day 2.

I'm vanilla - Monkey Alan, a minor character in the show, a warehouse worker. I win with the town.

Good news, Pooky, this time your defense of me isn't gonna make you feel silly later