Random Mafia 2 Game Over

[XGreyjoyX]

/confirm

[XGreyjoyX]

Random Vote: HairyCarey

That Multi Day kill is odd....

[XGreyjoyX]

Unvote, Vote Pooky

FOS: Pooky if he dosent get at least an attempted night kill on him

[XGreyjoyX]

Vote: WellofLostGnomes

FOS: Mathcam

[XGreyjoyX]

Vote: XgreyjoyX

Because I don't remember a single D1 post of yours, you're following a bandwagon that I don't agree with (:P), and you're FoSing our practically confirmed cop.

Although, with Pooky's defense of mathcam, the two of them may have agreed to mlet Pooky get lynched so that cam could be verified as a cop. *is teh paranoid*

Sorry about the lack of Day 1 posts, I had a project due and didnt have much time for Mafia.

As for me FoSing our "Practically Confirmed Cop", Im tempted to move that up to a full Vote.

His saying, His role ended up being a just a one-shot cop, seems a bit off to me. I will be the first to admit I don't have the mafia experience many of you do, but every time I have seen a one-shot role, they knew they were a one shot. But he claims he ended up being just a one-shot, which I understand as he did not know that before hand.

Also Pookys large defence of him may have been as you said just to get him viewed as a god guy. And now all of a sudden that he is a "practically confirmed" good guy, he can't investigate for us any more.
I know the last argument is pretty much just WIFOM, but when you add it all up something just feels a bit off to me.

[XGreyjoyX]

I'm a cop, and I'm fairly certain of my sanity. My PM was fairly explicit.

His PM was specfic enough to NOT make himself question his sanity at all, yet some how he didn't know that he was a one shot?
Seems odd to me.

As for my reason for voting WoLG, after our "Interesting" day one there I don't see much to go on. So I am just going back to my orginal suspect.
And I was not aware that I was Bandwagoning him. Theres what 2 votes on him now?

But I would like some explaining from Mathcam, as what he is saying just is not adding up.

[XGreyjoyX]

Il have to agree with WoTG on the Cam issue, he seems real scummy to me but he did lead to catching scum so he is off hook for now.

Unvote, Vote Coron

That all of a sudden telling us we need to wagon him with no reason makes me instead want to vote you (Coron).

[XGreyjoyX]

Then look for yourself Three Word Name. Look at what he's said the whole time. I ain't gonna hand it to you on a silver platter, think for yourself.

You see statments like that make me think you are the guilty one.
Every time you are questioned as to why you think he is guilty, you attack the player questioning you. If you want us to all jump on your bandwagon the burden of proof is not on us, it's on YOU. We arn't going to make your argument for you. If your so certain he's scum you must have a reason, tell us what it is.

Until you do my Vote for you stands.

[XGreyjoyX]

Twice now WoLG has had an extra vote on him, and his vote is not counting.

Miscount or Vote Stealing Role?

[XGreyjoyX]

Vote Count
Hez- 1 (Coron, WoLG)
Coron- 5 (xGreyJoyx, PBuG, Mathcam, Hez)

Once agian, 1 miscount I can see, 2 in a row might happen. But 3?
Seems like a voteing role to me.

Now for something completly diffrent

Coron first you made it seem it was very very obvious that he was scum, and when asked to explain it you were condensending and told them to read it agian cause they had obviously missed something.

Now that people are not beliving you we finally get an explination, unfourtunatly the explination is a bit lacking. What ou described as "Handing it to us on a silver platter" is now,

1)His lack of deep and meaningful posts Day 1 (Go back and read Day , its pretty much just Friztler Bamming 2 people then Cam claiming,pointing at Pooky and then us lynching him)

2)He ignores sanity, a)The "cop" said his PM was fairly clear that he was sane, b) What better way to test a cops sanity then to lynch someone they got quilty on?

3)Fishing for a cops result, the "cop" had already claimed, how does it hurt him at all to share his results from that night,I could see this argument if the cop had not come forward but they already had.

4)FoSing the "Cop", hes not the only one,the "Cop" suddenly was a One Shot, with a PM that was clear enough to make him certain of sanity but some how was not clear that it was a one shot? That seems a bit stranage to me

5)His Voting HairyCarey for "Stupid" stuff, right and you voting for him with the reason "He's scum guys lets do it!" is any diffrent How?


Unless you can suddenly point out what we all missed about him that pointed to scummy.My Vote for you stands

[XGreyjoyX]

So we are assuming Multi-Vote = Town?

[XGreyjoyX]

5)His Voting HairyCarey for "Stupid" stuff, right and you voting for him with the reason "He's scum guys lets do it!" is any diffrent How?

I didn't try to cite stuff that shouldn't be cited to back it up.

Huh?

I am interpreting that to mean you are saying that you didn't back it up becuase you felt you shouldn't?

That makes no sense to me. (If I am interpreting that wrong please correct me)

Also your behaviour this entire game seems scummy to me (Though to be fair I have not played with you before, it just may be your play style)

[XGreyjoyX]

alright at this point I feel it is in town's best intrest for me to claim.

I'm a 1-shot mass roleblocker. I block EVERYONE'S choice once night, this means you too scum.

So the deal is we lynch someone who is not me today, come back tomorrow and if night choices go thru you lynch me, otherwise we lynch another person who is not me.

Deal?

Sounds Good

Unvote

[XGreyjoyX]

I say do it tonight,for all we know this is some kinda gambit.

[XGreyjoyX]

Meh what ever Ill bow to the will of the majority.
Use it when you will, But then post saying why then.

[XGreyjoyX]

More pro town players then mafia players, so it might hurt town more. Though the flip side is that a large portion of the town might be plain townies so it balances out.

[XGreyjoyX]

I can't vote today, but i would probably have it on coron if i could.

Two voting roles?

Also Coron still seems like scum to me, his role claim does not remove my feeling he is scum, nor does his behavior since then.

ALso ibaesha defence of him seems a bit extreme, when people questioned Coron claim, and then said he should follow exactly what he said or they were not removing their votes (ie, he claimed and said he would use it that night as "Proof" (Though I don't exactly see what it proves)), ibaesha said he was willing to lycnh thoses who found Coron suddenly unwillingness to use it that night a bit scummy

As such I must

Vote: Coron, FoS: ibaesha

[XGreyjoyX]

@ibaesha - The extreme defence, I may have misunderstood you but,when me and FlyingMooCow said he seemed scummy you said you were happy to lych us. Tha to me sounds a bit extreme

[XGreyjoyX]

Coron:
1)Once agian you attack the messenger, not the message (You call what he says BS, you do not give any counter argument or so on)
2)Just because a role i normally belongs to one side or another does not mean its only used for that side (ie doctor)
2-b)When you claimed you said you were a One shot Mass role blocker, you said as proof you would use it that night.You then tried to get out of that "deadl" (though to be fair ibaesha did first suggest that)

3)When you claimed you said you were a Onshot Mass Role Blocker, Now you say you are also a vote stealer as well? A couple of points are raised here.
A)Why was this not in the original claim
B)If you are actually the vote stealer, how come you arn't voting where the extra vote appers?

4) Why did you ask how big a loss would No Lynch be to the town? From what I can see No one has put forward the idea of a no lynch

All of the above makes me VERY happy with my vote on Coron.

[XGreyjoyX]

I think your scum. Hence my post, your brillant counter argument is just repeating Did you read if over and over agian.

Heres mine, Yes I did read what You said and what he said, and yes I even read the enitre game (three time in total now in fact)

Now if I missed anything please do correct me, until then I stand by my vote for you.

[XGreyjoyX]

On top of this, if Coron is a townie, then we're losing a relatively unhelpful role by lynching him...

How big of a loss is a no lynch to town? That in addition to my

townie voting power

is essentially the cost of lynching me

If Hez has it why did Coron just claim he did?

[XGreyjoyX]

Ahhh I understand his natural one a day standerd voting power.
I stand corrected, I withdraw that from my list of points agianst him

[XGreyjoyX]

[Nitpicking] Cam did'nt claim as a one shot[/Nitpicking]

[XGreyjoyX]

Hmmm, I do believe I misjudged Coron, what appere to me as scummy may just be his play style.

Unvote: Coron

However I will leave a

FoS:Coron

m something about his claim seems off to me

[XGreyjoyX]

Hmm... Greyjoy: Interesting interesting - random vote wasn't bolded, vote on Pooky wasn't bolded (newb mistake or... ?)

This is my very first game on this server, it was truly newb mistakes.

Good post, but that last bit of logiv I don't agree with, that is total WIFOM as pooky could have just done that to get people to react as you did.

[XGreyjoyX]

I don't think he has done anything scummy and he has explained himself well. Do you maintain suspicions of mathcam?

Good question, think he is scum? No, maintain suspicons? Yes
Its the whole thing about earlier he said that his pm,was very explicit.
Then suddenly oh whoops he is a one shot? That seems odd to me.

Though his One-Shot did catch scum (Though I would be intrested in why he chose that target, (he may already have posted it and I missed it), and he may actually have had some sort of weird one shot or triggerd role.

[XGreyjoyX]

Is here

Vote:Hez

, lets see if WoLG idea of the lurker wagon will egt some posting agian

[XGreyjoyX]

Is here

Vote:Hez

, lets see if WoLG idea of the lurker wagon will egt some posting agian

[XGreyjoyX]

Bad move.

Being here? , Voting Hez? or wanting Lurkers to post?

[XGreyjoyX]

Unvote

Good it worked!

[XGreyjoyX]

wow that was so scummy

FOS:XGreyjoyX

What is?