Payola Mafia - Game Over

the silent speaker · Post Post #525 (ISO) » Sun Mar 12, 2006 7:58 am

what was your offer....

Why do you care?

BabyJesus · Post Post #526 (ISO) » Sun Mar 12, 2006 11:32 am

Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:BJ, as I see it, if there's a scum mason or the possibility for a scum mason, the mod doesn't explicitly state their innocence. On top of that, the set up so far seems quite balanced and a scum mason would completely screw over the town.

I agree it is unlikely, but you must admit someone not cleared by a cop havign that much money is at least SOME cause for concern....

Cogito Ergo Sum · Post Post #527 (ISO) » Sun Mar 12, 2006 11:42 am

Well with Help I'm a bug dead, I'm personally more worried about the possibility of Pooky being a GF.

BabyJesus · Post Post #528 (ISO) » Sun Mar 12, 2006 11:59 am

Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Well with Help I'm a bug dead, I'm personally more worried about the possibility of Pooky being a GF.

great, now you put that idea in my head....

the silent speaker · Post Post #529 (ISO) » Sun Mar 12, 2006 3:50 pm

Ah, don't worry, BJ. Cogito wouldn't out his own gf that easily.

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #530 (ISO) » Sun Mar 12, 2006 6:01 pm

Pooky GURANTEED his protownness this game.

You can not get more confirmed than thaT!!!!!

BabyJesus · Post Post #531 (ISO) » Sun Mar 12, 2006 7:10 pm

PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Pooky GURANTEED his protownness this game.

You can not get more confirmed than thaT!!!!!

are you sure you aren't a friendly werewolf.....

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #532 (ISO) » Sun Mar 12, 2006 7:59 pm

Pooky Gurantees have never been proven wrong!

Pooky's gurantee is as good as gold!

VisMaior · Post Post #533 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:49 am

Pooky: http://www.mafiascum.net/cgi-bin/wiki.p ... Repetition

SpeedyKQ · Post Post #534 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:05 am

Payment Count:

20 Cogito Ergo Sum (Nightcow 20)
10 VisMaior (BabyJesus 10)

Cash Count:

1235 Nightcow
737 PookyTheMagicalBear
485 the silent speaker
345 BabyJesus
125 Vaughn
50 Cogito Ergo Sum
50 inHimshallibe
50 VisMaior
50 Fritzler

inHimshallibe · Post Post #535 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2006 9:04 am

I approve of the lynch of the deflective CES.

BabyJesus · Post Post #536 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2006 9:09 am

Pay 50: CES

Cogito Ergo Sum · Post Post #537 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2006 9:11 am

inHim wrote: I approve of the lynch of the deflective CES.

Deflective? I've stated my reasons, I just don't feel continuing the argument is in any way useful. I'm not going to convince you guys and there are other scum out there.

inHimshallibe · Post Post #538 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2006 9:13 am

Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:
inHim wrote: I approve of the lynch of the deflective CES.
Deflective? I've stated my reasons, I just don't feel continuing the argument is in any way useful. I'm not going to convince you guys and there are other scum out there.

I meant how you continually pushed Stoofer instead of logicticus.

Cogito Ergo Sum · Post Post #539 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2006 9:19 am

I just went after Mr. Stoofer. I didn't really see much reason to go after logicticus(until he basically confessed to being scum, that is). But I've admitted that yesterday was not my smartest play. I expected docs that don't die to be, you know, suspicious or something.

the silent speaker · Post Post #540 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:29 pm

What part of "suspicious, yes, but autolynching them plays into the mafia's hands just as much as autofreebieing them" has been giving you trouble?

Nightcow · Post Post #541 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:38 pm

the silent speaker wrote:What part of "suspicious, yes, but autolynching them plays into the mafia's hands just as much as autofreebieing them" has been giving you trouble?

Vaughn · Post Post #542 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2006 4:53 pm

tss wrote:Ah, don't worry, BJ. Cogito wouldn't out his own gf that easily.

Or WOULD HE?

So with a brief re-read (again), I've linked BJ and CES together.

CES because he's been pushing for Stoofer's lynch for quite some time, and has stopped this day. BJ because his contributions to the game thus far... is questionable. Also, He Fos'ed Nightcow for putting money on CES, and then he puts money on CES himself.

Confusing to say the very least.

BabyJesus · Post Post #543 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2006 5:02 pm

Vaughn wrote:Also, He Fos'ed Nightcow for putting money on CES, and then he puts money on CES himself.

Confusing to say the very least.

the fos was for stopping the lynch at the very last moment. That makes baby jesus cry. I put money on CES so he could not pull a logiticus and spend all of his own money to change the lead.

And how has my play been detrimental? I seem to remember being a big supporter of lynching scum yesterday. You'd be better off to let me do the heavy lifting here, guy.

Vaughn · Post Post #544 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2006 5:10 pm

Detrimental? I've never said your play is detrimental. My choice of word was questionable due to the fact that most of your posts are "I agree" or short 1-liner statements.

If we assume that Nightcow, Pooky, TSS, and yourself are all good guys, then we've already won this game, because Nightcow alone can buy out every other player in this game, especially with Pooky and TSS's support.

If that's the case then, shrug, let's just get this game over with. But on the chance that, that isn't the case, I'm going to have to peg you as the most likely of the top 4 to be scum.

My case, I admit, is a weak one because I don't have much support behind it, But I beleive in playing with an open mind, so this is my 2 cents.

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #545 (ISO) » Mon Mar 13, 2006 6:54 pm

Which is why we should get BJ/TSS to burn their cash.

The town is better off with most of the money being in the hands of myself and Nightcow.

BabyJesus · Post Post #546 (ISO) » Tue Mar 14, 2006 12:35 am

PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Which is why we should get
BJ
/TSS to burn their cash.

fixed

VisMaior · Post Post #547 (ISO) » Tue Mar 14, 2006 12:42 am

The town is better off with most of the money being in the hands of myself and Nightcow.

Lets make sure Nightcow has more than you, possible GF. Just to be on the safe side. And I agree on the BJ/tss cashburning excercise.

inHimshallibe · Post Post #548 (ISO) » Tue Mar 14, 2006 6:46 am

We've got 18 hours 'til CES' lynch. I'd like to hear a claim.

Cogito Ergo Sum · Post Post #549 (ISO) » Tue Mar 14, 2006 7:42 am

I'd rather not claim if I can help it. (I have my reasons.)

Let's summarize your suspicions of me(correct me if I've left anything out):
1. I went after the claimed doc.
2. I didn't go after logicticus.

My defense:
1. I don't see being willing to take a stance and being willing to take the spotlight as scummy. I've given reasons, which I feel are valid, and I would not hesitate to stand up for my reasoning again. Doc claims are too often seen as a freebie pass and I see it here too. Outed docs are no longer power roles and I'm not going to be especially afraid of lynching 'em, especially not one that has already survived two nights. And I know this is WIFOM, but have you ever seen a scumbag actively try to lynch a doc in a non-lynch-or-lose situation, because I sure haven't? I don't see how my play benefits the town.
2. I admit that I should have kept my eyes open for other scum and that I failed in that aspect, but can you really say there was a case against logicticus? I never saw any serious suspects besides Stoofer/Vaughn. Is it then not logical for me to go after him?

And now I will re-read and try to catch some scum for the town(besides Vaughn of course).