PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I guess ur suggesting that I calmly fold my hands and sit down and try to use gentle logic to bring you guys around so that we can actually get a game going instead of shouting at the top of my lungs in fustration at the screen?
Oh wait, that's what I was doing for the last three weeks before I got angry and started ranting! As I remember, you guys just nodded alot and said vote: Pooky without actuaylly giving any reasons or logic.
I call "FOUL!!" right here.
Vote: Pooky
.
Here's the "actual reasoning" you've been looking for.
By clicking on ye olde
Pooky's posts in the thread link (conveniently given to us by the mod in the player list), it's pretty apparent that your posts have had a very distinct lack of logic. Post-by-post, here is the "content" and "logic" you claim to have given:
0: Confirm post.
1: Random vote for Coron. Joke about Coron-wagoning
2: Explanation of why you haven't been posting, talking about lynching Coron
3: Vote for Flying Dutchman with no logic or backing whatsoever. A bandwagon vote, in fact, against the townie who was lynched that day. Small red flag.
4: Pushing for FD's lynch. Not much to be said there.
5: "Good Riddance" after FD finished himself off. Really productive, eh?
6: Jumping on another bandwagon on Day Two. Note that you still haven't done *ANYTHING* productive. Big red flag. Scummeter++;
7: You switch votes to VisMaior, and seem to be fishing for information from RoadBird. Another Red Flag.
8: *Smack* A switch to *ANOTHER* bandwagon. You enjoy this bandwagoning shindig, don't you?
9: Hey, you finally said something somewhat insightful! Congratulations.
10: "The current play is totally not pooky." Another helpful post, if ever I've seen one. (I hope my sarcasm is apparent by now.)
11: Hopping aboard another bandwagon, this time against a lurker. Which happened to turn into me. Who happens to be town-aligned.
12: Unvoted once I came in to replace. I personally appreciate it, but I also note that it still contains no other content.
13: You don't understand why the play isn't you. I'm very much beginning to understand why the play is you. Repeated blatant bandwagoning, lack of content, and general lurking-ness. I think that's plenty reason to pressure you..... possibly even enough reason to lynch you.
14: This is, what... the second post with real insight? You are quite right in saying that scum often paint a situation as black or white, as two-sided with no other alternatives. Previous posters may have backed up their vote with little reasoning, but I hope that this post provides the reasoning you've been clamoring for.
15: "What am I supposed to be defending myself from?" The third post like this... it's becoming very bothersome. Personally, I think you're sluffing off the suspicions by claiming ignorance.
16-17: Your rant-posts
18: Spam/Joking. Another "I'm not going to defend myself because I don't think I have reason to" post.
19: Your last post, the one to which I am responding.
Here's my more-than-two-line response. I certainly have given myself enough conviction to vote for you. I said it before, but I'll say it again:
You've lurked, making posts with little to no helpful content.
You've bandwagoned repeatedly, against Flying Dutchman and LyingBrian, both of whom turned out as citizens. You also hopped on the Kerplunk lurkerwagon, giving *me* extra reason to suspect you of being scum.
You're using the "I don't see a case against me" defense.... one that I know I've used in the past as scum, and one that just got a scumbag killed in another game (TSAGod in Norse Myth Mafia, if anyone cares to check/verify this). I feel it's a scumtell, so I'm adding it to my list of reasons.
There, I've presented a real case against you. Start defending yourself, scumbag.
