TT; Book 1: Bible Verse Mafia - Game over!

[Thoth]

*Waves*

[Thoth]

Read the whole thread quickly at work. Need to read it a bit more thorough again tomorrow.

First impressions were FD, EnderX and armlx. Funny enough I found both Enders listing of verses and armlx attacking him for that suspicious.

[Thoth]

I think the Psalm 32:7 is much more likely to be a doctor than a hider. The way it's phrased (using 'you') makes it sound to me that VisMaior is the one hiding/protecting someone else. Not hiding himself. (Assuming his roleclaim is true of course).

After the last page of posts I'm now in dubio between LyingBrian and RoadBird. I really dislike LB urging for a claim after FD made defense without evaluating that defense.

I dislike Roadbird putting up the 9th vote for what looks like a complete nonreason even more though.

Vote: RoadBird

Just replying below, not a reason for my vote:

Besides the extremely bad quoting you are implying that God....euh...Mod will not tell us whether someone had a particular role. What do you base that spooky thought on?

Upon death, only the verse number of the deceased players will be given. However, different colouring of the verse numbers will reveal alignment.

[Thoth]

I would expect that scum has a verse like Revelation 13:18.

[Thoth]

Nothing happened that changed my opinion:

vote:Roadbird

[Thoth]

What why? If Im a hider and die in the night, the guy i hid with is scum. So its benefical to know who he is. If im a doc the guy I target wont get targeted. So its bad if everyone knows who I target.

If you're a standard hider and the guy you hide with is killed you'll be killed as well. Unless a doc protects your target you'd reduce yourself to a one shot cop.

[Thoth]

Yes, of course, but what I mean is that you should not reveal who you're going to hide with as it makes it easy for scum to kill 2 in one go.

[Thoth]

There are so many verses to choose from that every claim is doubtful.

I agree that VisMaior's behaviour is very strange. I'm not convinced of RoadBird's innocence, but VisMaior has passed him on my list for now.

unvote:RoadBird
vote: VisMaior

PS: I saw mith still mentioning the deadline, but according to Cad's last post it was retracted.

[Thoth]

Yes, missed the hints. Sorry.

[Thoth]

Raises hand 8) .

[Thoth]

I don't really like the Pooky wagon. Mostly because he's defending the same way I'm defending when there's a wagon on me and I have no clue why, so he looks genuine to me.

vote:DP

I don't like the way he switched from Kerplunk to Pooky like it was a given that we need to lynch one of those today.

[Thoth]

What! Then I'm retaliation voting for nothing.

[Thoth]

Interested to hear from inhim and LML what it was exactly that they saw? I voted RoadBird for a good reason (placing vote 9 of 10 for a complete nonreason coupled with not addressing FD's defense) and next day I immediately put my vote on him again as the same reason still applied (and even got stronger when FD turned up innocent).

[Thoth]

The 2nd day Roadbird wagon definitively was not the 2nd largest wagon when it was going.

I also did not mean that post as being a claim. I meant that anyone paying good attention to the game should have seen Mith posting 2 numbers that together could be a bible verse. There's no excuse for missing that.

[Thoth]

Additionally, they will be told if they have an ability and whether or not their choice is optional or required. If an ability requires more info concerning the choice, it will be given as well. All other details of the abilities and their effects are for the players to figure out for themselves.

[Thoth]

I'm leaving for Taiwan in an hour, so unavailable for the next day or so. When I'm there I should have access on my room, but I hope not to spend to much time there;)