Firefly Mafia - Voyage over
-
-
RangeroftheNorth Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 686
- Joined: October 12, 2005
- Location: Salem, OR
-
-
RangeroftheNorth Goon
-
-
RangeroftheNorth Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 686
- Joined: October 12, 2005
- Location: Salem, OR
EmpTyger wrote:[Came down with a cold and still am rather busy with end-of-semester work. May still be posting infrequently, thought hopefully not for too much longer.]
I really don’t like how DP, d8P, VisM, and bloojay voted for Nanook… for lurking… when he also wasn’t posting in any other thread… on Thanksgiving week?! Especially right after I listed 4 concrete reasons against armlx; each of which was much better than anything against Nanook, and each of which received no attention whatsoever despite the intense focus placed on Nanook.
DP:
You began the bandwagon against Nanook to lurkerprod him. Why haven’t you said anything since his return?
d8P:
You were the second on the lurkerprod bandwagon. Kind of ironic how after that you lurked the entire week, isn’t it?
VisM:
This is the defense you gave for your vote of Nanook:
As you are still voting Nanook, do you still believe this to be true?VisMaior [92] wrote:No real reason for anyone. This game started slow, and then fell back.
bloojay:
Can you explain why you are still voting Nanook? Because I can’t figure out why you would have voted him in [85], and then make [107] without unvoting.bloojay [107] wrote:hmmm....well, i know Nanook has been inactive in all of his other games. Perhaps a prod, Mod? Maybe that'd pull something up.Vote: EmpTygerI am suspicious of the way he attempted to divert the bandwagon on Nanook with some fairly week evidence against armlx, and I am suspicious of how he has been attempting to lead the town.-
-
RangeroftheNorth Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 686
- Joined: October 12, 2005
- Location: Salem, OR
Apart from the issue with nanook, it is difficult to say which attempts to lead the town might have been harmful. Both your attack on Iammars and the question of familiarity with the show seem somewhat suspicious to me. Neither of these indicates that you're scum, but you did both of them in such a way that you seemed to attempting to focus the town's attention on a specific issue that would divert them from looking for scum. That is why I am voting for you.EmpTyger wrote:<snip>And as for leading the town: could you say specifically which alleged instance(s) of my leading the town you feel have been harmful?-
-
RangeroftheNorth
-
-
RangeroftheNorth Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 686
- Joined: October 12, 2005
- Location: Salem, OR
-
-
RangeroftheNorth Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 686
- Joined: October 12, 2005
- Location: Salem, OR
-
-
RangeroftheNorth Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 686
- Joined: October 12, 2005
- Location: Salem, OR
-
-
RangeroftheNorth Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 686
- Joined: October 12, 2005
- Location: Salem, OR
-
-
RangeroftheNorth Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 686
- Joined: October 12, 2005
- Location: Salem, OR
-
-
RangeroftheNorth Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 686
- Joined: October 12, 2005
- Location: Salem, OR
-
-
RangeroftheNorth Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 686
- Joined: October 12, 2005
- Location: Salem, OR
UnvoteI think that if PB is not counterclaimed, he is almost definately who he claims he is.
Of the unconfirmed people, Fritler has contributed almost nothing other than votes. As blind voting is worse at this stage than any other, and unless he posts thoughts and ideas we are not going to be able to get a read on him, I willVote: Fritzler-
-
RangeroftheNorth Goon
-
-
RangeroftheNorth Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 686
- Joined: October 12, 2005
- Location: Salem, OR
-
-
RangeroftheNorth Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 686
- Joined: October 12, 2005
- Location: Salem, OR
-
-
RangeroftheNorth Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 686
- Joined: October 12, 2005
- Location: Salem, OR
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-