No one, he didn't vote in the first place.
It's a scam!
Mini 277 - Webcomic Mafia - Game Over!
-
-
Tyfo
-
-
Tyfo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 398
- Joined: October 23, 2005
- Location: Aarhus, Denmark
-
-
Tyfo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 398
- Joined: October 23, 2005
- Location: Aarhus, Denmark
Bertrand, what was with all the voting-unvoting in the start and anti-bandwagoning now? I'll like a 4 page synopsis, please.
However,I'llunvotefor now; Piehasn't gotten anything suspicious on him, for the moment at least.
Care to expFuldu wrote: Scummybehavior isokay, but mildly scummy behavior isn't.lain,fuldu? (I didn't get any of the other posts either)..-
-
Tyfo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 398
- Joined: October 23, 2005
- Location: Aarhus, Denmark
Oh, sorry. MFuldu wrote:
Care to reread the whole post in context, Tyfo?Tyfo wrote:
Care to expFuldu wrote: Scummybehavior isokay, but mildly scummy behavior isn't.lain,fuldu? (I didn't get any of the other posts either).
Fuldu wrote:Okay, TSAGod, if you want to get all self-righteous about how obvious your sarcasm should have been, you're going to have to work on the clarity of your writing. I've read this five times and I still can't figure out what you're trying to say. If I were to translate it into brief, coherent sentences you would be saying:
I'm in favor of bandwagons, as long as there isn't a reason for them. Scummy behavior is okay, but mildly scummy behavior isn't.
Unless you've gone totally off the deep end, that's not what you're trying to say. And it doesn't come across as sarcasm this time. It really seems like you're trying to say something valid and reasonable, it just isn't coming out right. Proofreading is your friend.issed the ":"which explained more thananything else, (plus a few words) - remindto not read posts between 6pm - 4 pm. ;D
VitaminR, yes,I'm pretty alright. Just wanted to see if anyone would catch my "subtle" pointers..-
-
Tyfo Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 398
- Joined: October 23, 2005
- Location: Aarhus, Denmark
He said, or at least the quote stated, that he was a "lame-o townie". It's always better to lynch a claimed townie if a better solution isn't available, as a power-role should not lie in the first place. It's presumeably "safer" to claim townie if you're a scum, as there is none to counter it; but more dangerous as it's "easier" to lynch a claimed townie - in the beginning at least.bertrand wrote:Thok wrote:Feh. Akonas is clearly a safe lynch by now, (he's either scum or not a power role) so there's no real reason to stall. I'm willing to vote him to end the day and see what happens.Unvote TSAGod, vote AkonasFoS Thok and StevieT92: Please let him claim before lenching. It's too late now. I've got my eye on you. If you're right though, good job.
So, I'll say we did the best thing at this point..
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-