>.>
Mods not giving links >.>
I love you <3kmd wrote:15. Do not use red. It is my color. All use of this color will be edited. The only exception is if the color is being used in Vote Count Analysis or anything else where scum or scum reads
Exe is mafia trying to confirm himself as town. It's a question that has absolutely zero chance of being answered, and I could easily see a bunch of people going "well I don't think mafia would draw attention to themselves that quickly in this setup..."Exe wrote:@Mod: Can you confirm or deny if there are any normal mafia in this game? I wasn't sure if this was confirmed as cult only.
"Hm, well then, Andy, lemme just ask" sounds awkward as hell.Plum wrote:Hm, well then, Andy, lemme just ask. You have nice pretty setup speculation in your first post. But I don't see it going anywhere. I mean, great, Cult may well have a backup Recruiter or suchlike and very probably do not have regular nightkills in addition to regular recruition. Dandy. But what difference does this make for us now? And why don't you touch upon that at all? Why so much speculation and so little in the way of conclusions?
Right. Definitely scum.Exe wrote:ANDY. PARAMA, ANDY, EXE ALLIANCE IS GO.
I don't understand the scumandy argument. Sounds like Frenzy Mafia andy to me. Never seen your scum though.
Probable scum for even caring about his first post.CoolDog wrote:fuck, I messed up on my first post, should read:
Seems fidgety, self conscious. (not unself...)
Backtrack.Exe wrote:Parama, why do you hate my love for you?
I never said you were town. I think you're exaggerating the seriousness of the alliance.
This doesn't matter at all.AurorusVox wrote:I see. In that case Parama's reasons for finding Exe scummy aren't so solid after all. Parama, do you agree with Andrius' assessment of what an Alliance is/should be?
MY GOD ANDY YOU KNOW BETTER THAN THISAndy wrote:I outlined CR tells, and I don't want to post them here right now for fear of telling him/her how to NOT play.
I'm still not seeing why this would be scummy of Andy, even though it's obviously wrong. In my experiences, starting alliances is his MO, along with breadcrumbing.VasudeVa wrote:Andy is starting an alliance, at page 2. Alliances are bad in cult games(Alliance people get recruited, and it'll be bad from then on.)
Bolded mine.ender wrote:There is no point of doing an alliance to be honest,what is the alliance members turn out to be cultand they sneak in to the alliance.
I don't see Plum making that sort of mistake as normal mafia. As Cult Recruiter, most definitely.AV wrote:Nacho, how do you determine Plum is the CR rather than straight scum?
I don't like this. It's better to switch your vote too much than too little.AV wrote:I left my vote there because "in that case" (i.e. under Andy's description) your reason wouldn't stack up, but I wanted to hear what you had to say about alliances before making a change. After waiting and you not responding, I've been considering moving to one of VV or Andy.
Exe wrote:LOL I'm scum?
My god, I didn't think I was that much of a comedian. That being said, why are you so surprised about being called scum? The accusation came on about page three, so it's not like you've established incredibly townie play.Exe wrote:This is just a rofl-fest.
I have a question for you, then. Were you serious about the alliance or not? Because this quote suggests that you were, and yet this post suggests you weren't.Exe wrote:Plus, I don't give a crap who says what, I think the Andy + Parama + Exe combo is beast mode, and I proposed it in Frenzy long before I had any clue whether or not Parama or Andy where town.
Why?Exe wrote:Also, Nacho wants me dead instead of the person he thinks is a cult recruiter? That smells fishy as hell.
The town act, and because he sucks as scum.Plum wrote:Hm? What act and why not?
It seems to me like the sarcastic dig at his speculation sort of contradicts the poking around you were trying to do. Why would you call his speculation bad if you were supposedly trying to determine whether it was good or not? Or am I misunderstanding something here?Plum wrote:If you think it sounded awkward I dunno what to tell you; it was the phrasing that came to mind. 'Nice' was meant to be fairly sarcastic - that is, it's set up to look all long and pretty as a post so early in the game, looking like it's brimming with something useful. But with no conclusions, it seems more like intentionally trying to look useful but not actually something with useful conclusions applied. That said it was possible that Andrius meant to put in useful conclusions or imply ones that didn't come across (see my response to him above), so I wanted to poke around (and he didn't follow up with useful conclusions, so there you are).
This is a bit of a scummy mindset to have. Do you normally have it when voting?Plum wrote:I could've switched my vote to him, sure, but I didn't feel like it and didn't think I'd gain or lose anything by it.
I'm not altogether sure that there IS a mafia.Plum wrote:Furthermore, if you believe so strongly that I'm the Cult Leader, why the heck don't you vote me now? Even if you think Exe is likely Mafia as well, Cult Leader is generally more dangerous. Some things aren't lining up with your suspicions here.
Why exactly would it be scummy if I had a good reason, but not if I had a bad one?AV wrote:Soo, waiting for an answer to a question before I decide whether something is scummy or not is also bad play? Why are you so impatient? If Nacho has a good explanation for why he thinks you are CR instead of mafia, then he isn't scummy. If he doesn't have a reason - or has a bad reason - I would find him scummy. There's no need to speculate on his scumminess before he's answered my question.
The South Park picture should have been your first hint.AV wrote:But I voted Andy because he said he was joking around about the alliance; I fail to see why his words "Alliance is go!" should be taken as a joke when Exe said the same thing. It was this double standard that I was voting him for, as I thought was clear by my post. Andy only said that it was a joke a couple of posts before mine.
What is that something? And why is this sentence all the attention that "something" gets?Exe wrote:Every time I think AV is seeming more town, he starts being suspicious again. I say to you, something is not right about AV.
What are the differences between FrenzyAndy and CVMAndy?Exe wrote:@Andy: You're really not seeming like the Andy from Frenzy mafia. Can you at least comment on a player other than yourself? Because so far it seems like you're trying pretty damn hard to appear townie.
Cop-out for what?Exe wrote:@AV: Your entire explanation of how you are just being "patient" reads as a cop-out to me.
You shouldn't need to think a vote through this deeply unless it's LyLo. If you're really thinking over a vote in this situation more than 5 minutes, you're overthinking.AV wrote:Clearly if I think Andy is scummy due to his alliance shenanigans that lets VV off the misrep hook; if I think VV's scummy that means Andy's proposed scumminess due to the alliance is a misrep. I was trying to decide what side to come down on, and that decision was eased by Andy's "Oh I was joking (but clearly Exe wasn't!)" post.
This doesn't make sense to me.Exe wrote:Your vote isn't on me.
Sounds like someone is trying so hard to pick the pro-town stance that he can't even remember what stance he picked.
Andrius wrote:Plum is high-suspect
I thought you weren't voting Plum at this point because you weren't happy that I called Plum CR and then didn't vote her?Andrius wrote:Nacho is leaning town
Parentheses are anti-town, haven't you heard?AV wrote:I know that. I was explaining why I hadn't unvoted. While deciding what to do (i.e. in the situation before I voted Andy) my vote is more useful on you than on no one. That's a statement in the (persisting/perpetual) present tense because the sentiment is still true despite the condition not being fulfilled. My vote is more useful on someone (in this specific case you) than on no one.
It's mostly "I wouldn't expect scumPlum to do this". I have no experience at all with CRs of any type.AV wrote:I'm not sure, does your argument just boil down to (gut)meta of Plum - "I wouldn't expect scumPlum to do this" - or a familiarity with the workings of CR's in general? It looks to be a bit of both, is there one that's more prominent than the other or are they equal?
Well, I wasn't voting Plum because I wasn't confident enough in my reasoning for her being CR. Had I had a good reason, I definitely would've been voting her, and it would've been scummy if I wasn't.AV wrote:Nacho, if you had a bad reason I would have thought you were making one up to justify not voting Plum, whereas a good reason that actually explained the distinction satisfactorily would have been...satisfyingly townish.
You obviously thought that it was fairly possible since YOU WERE THE ONE WHO BROUGHT IT UP.Exe wrote:Why was I surprised at being called scum? Because I legitimately didn't think there were mafia until I was accused of being one.
Then explain the post where you told Parama he was "overexaggerating the seriousness of the alliance."Exe wrote:Regarding the alliance, I'm pretty sure I've made my stance clear on that so far. My last few posts have dealt with that issue repeatedly.
Occam's razor says go for the scummiest person until they die, then rinse and repeat.Exe wrote:Why is it fishy to want mafia dead instead of CR? Because frankly I'm still not convinced there are mafia, while we KNOW there is a cult recruiter and we KNOW cult recruiters get stronger the more you let them live. This isn't rocket science.
Occam's razor says go for the CR until we know there's anything else to fear.
You went "AV is becoming more like my experience with him." and then "now AV is becoming suspicious" with absolutely nothing in between.Exe wrote:Since when have I only posted one sentence about AV? I don't see how you can even begin to make the argument that the sentence u quoted was the only time I gave attention to AV being suspicious. And that "something" is that I have a gut scummy read on him. Isn't that obvious?
Do you think he's... copping out from taking a side? Because I thought he explained his conundrum pretty well.Exe wrote:Seriously? I think someone is just asking questions for the sake of questions. This is starting to smell like an act to appear pro-town.
Read my posts accusing AV and tell me how exactly you don't understand what I am referring to. Please.
To clarify VV I trust your read on him.Nachomamma8 wrote:Well then why are you attacking Andy?
If you have reasons, the least you can do is give them.
ANDY THIS IS THE FIRST TIME YOU'VE VOTED SINCE YOUR RANDOM VOTE.Andrius wrote:Because I'm not sure. Vibes. And I was hoping you'd explain why you didn't vote CR_Plum.
Though I feel most confident right now in voting a scumbag, of whatever color.
Unvote, Vote: Exe
CR is nice, but the supposed normal mafia is 2nd best.
BUT IS THERE A VOTE?AdumbroDeus wrote:I get a flailing scum read a mile wide from this post. ATEs, Implicit appeals to consequences of actions, the works.
I did.Andrius wrote:Nacho, I voted CoolDog page 5. You might have missed that.
ANDY: WE CAN LYNCH VV, ADD, OR PLUM. CHOOSE.Andrius wrote:Everyone after Nacho totally found any excuse to vote Adumbro.
We still have scum_Exe right in front of us.
And the VI_Squad to deal with.
OR YOU COULD BE A GOOD TOWNIE AND VOTE ADD.Andrius wrote:And I know that deadline is in a couple days, and I'm willing to claim early (like R/F) to let you all shift onto another wagon without being in uber-panic mode at deadline.
We have a term for this in my town. I don't quite remember it that clearly, but it has something to do with wine in front of me.AdumbroDues wrote:Lemme ask you this, if I was scum why wouldn't I vote? I had the perfect opportunity to do so while cloaking it in the wagon. I certainly gave a lot more reasoning then most people, it would've been easy to justify a vote and push a myslynch, especially when he was already at l-1, and the fact that since it was my first post with content in the game and the strong stance would mean that it would draw attention (even though he was an ostensibly safe target). Voting would've been the safe choice.
So why didn't I do it? Cause I hadn't caught up fully and wasn't settled on a target.
SPEAK THAT SWEET SWEET TRUTH SISTERPlum wrote:But yeah. Either way you be drawing attention. And in the post in question you make no mention of needing to catch up or being on the verge thereof or anything.
I like this guy.chesskid wrote:^ you shut it
AV WE'VE ALREADY BEEN HERE AND DID THIS.AV wrote:Unvote; Vote: Exe
Exe wrote:TL;DR: You're taking the safe route. If you think I am the CR, by all means, build a case, but if not, you're just picking the safe route, and that's scummy.
Exe wrote:When Andy flips scum, Chesskid looks preeeetty bad today.
WHAT THE FUCK EXE??Exe wrote:Exe wrote:TL;DR: You're taking the safe route.If you think I am the CR, by all means, build a case, but if not, you're just picking the safe route, and that's scummy.Exe wrote:[size=200When Andy flips scum,[/size] Chesskid looks preeeetty bad today.Exe wrote:, Chesskid looks preeeetty bad today.When Andy flips scum
I felt it would be a good placeholder.Plum wrote:Have to ask, though, going after recruit over going after Recruiter? Really?
KEEP LAUGHING SCUMBAG AND TAKE THAT SHIT TO THE GRAVEYARD QT.Exe wrote:Lol.
OKAY SCUMBAG. IF YOU WERE WAITING, MAYBE YOU WOULD MAKE IT CLEARER, HUH?Exe wrote:I was waiting for someone to pull that bullshit. Such a terribad
Speaking of shit, let's look at some of that of the BULL variety, from none other than THE SCUMBAG HIMSELF:Exe wrote:I am referring to "scum" as "anti-town." AKA, I think we are looking for cult members which therefore are scum. NICE TRY THOUGH.
You'll see that unlike the people who are claiming "THIS GUY IS SCUM AND THIS GUY IS CR SO LET'S LYNCH THE SCUM," I actually am of the opinion that the cult IS the scum.
In other words, your case is shit.
HEY THAT DOESN'T SOUND LIKE YOU'RE REFERRING TO CR.Exe wrote:LOL I'm scum? I actually didn't even see that implication. I am of the belief that there are no scum, and in a game called "cult vs mason" I think asking whether or not it's only "cult vs masons" is a pretty fair question.
LOL THAT DOESN'T EITHER.Exe wrote:Cooldog, weren't you scum in Fate's prison mafia?
DID YOU JUST USE THE WORD "SCUM" AND "MAFIA" INTERCHANGEABLY? YES YOU DID, SCUMBAG.Exe wrote:Why was I surprised at being called scum? Because I legitimately didn't think there were mafia until I was accused of being one.
NUMBER #5 RIGHT HERE BABYExe wrote:I really hate when an honest question to the mod makes me appear scum.
CR DOESN'T HAVE CONNECTIONS ON D1. #6.Exe wrote:If Adumbro flips scum, this is seriously bad. You're defending him here, especially when you end up agreeing with Nacho's arguments later in the same post? Seriously, why can't you pick a real side?
SEE ABOVE, EXCEPT SWITCH #6 WITH #7.Exe wrote:I'm getting serious scum-mates vibes from Andy & Adumbro,
8+9Exe wrote:The fact still remains that you found Andy scummy but didn't actually take a stand on it, which reads as serious distancing. And mad scummy.
DOUBLE DIGITS BABY!!!!!1111Exe wrote:Meh, w.e. I'm not going to keep fighting this. I'm fine with either scum swinging.
Oh, btw, translation.Exe wrote:Oh btw, translation: "I knew I just needed my vote somewhere, and then I realized I could twist someone else's words around."
Exe wrote:It's funny.
Because Nacho's case really was retarded.
I hate when people get lucky based on retarded cases.
Kmd4390 wrote:
Exe, Cult Recruiter, was lynched Day 2
[/b]
Exe wrote:Oh, and I really was trying to just ask the mod the question about scum >.>
Basically this game I was caught based on things I legitimately did that were considered slips...So. Fucking. Annoying.
and of course you didn't think they were slips. that's why you did them!Kmd4390 wrote:
Exe, Cult Recruiter, was lynched Day 2
[/b]
He's trying to stay alive... BY CLAIMING CULT?Andrius wrote:He's probably mafia attempting to stay alive via claiming cult.
That's not why I lynched youExe wrote:UGH.
I hate that the reasons for wanting me lynched were:
A mod question that I ACTUALLY WANTED THE ANSWER TO. <<Not related to my alignment.
A joke about an alliance. <<Not related to my alignment
UGH
ALSO I TOLD YOU ALL THAT THERE WAS NO MAFIA BUT NO ONE FUCKING BELIEVED ME.
Sorry about your lynch .AdumbroDeus wrote:My lynch was incredibly dumb still, you guys never answered the question of whether town in my situation would do it (essentially post reads piecemail) especially considering it could've created a quicklynch.
Still, you applied the same type of reasoning to exe and killed him, so can't complain too much.