DEFCON Mafia 2.0 - Over, American Victory!

chesskid3 · Post Post #1025 (ISO) » Mon Dec 20, 2010 4:56 pm

HOW MANY TIMES HAVE YOU SEEN FATE LYNCHED ON D1?

Fate · Post Post #1026 (ISO) » Mon Dec 20, 2010 4:58 pm

Percy is :goodposting:

Chesskid the KEY issue is the fucking dissonance between:

"I voted Toog because his wagon was possible"

THEN

"I don't want a D1 Toog lynch, so I'm voting Fate because he has a wagon on him"

Shameless wagoning is NOT town.

Posting a case on your "biggest read" GANDALFZ is.

Oh wait, if Im 90% what the fuck does that make gandalf? Also 90% is horseshit, for what, calling for policy nukes? On dana who "YOU ARESURE IZ TOWNNNNN" although he hasn't done a goddamn pro-town thing and admits he's scummy as fuck.

HEY DANA THERES NO MORE WAGON ON YOU, YOU SAID YOU WOULD START CONTRIBUTING TO THE THREAD NOW?

"Fate is scum cuz he moved his vote on me" does not qualify as content, just stupidity. Kthx. What do you make of chesskid's town read on you when you're always scummy?

Fate · Post Post #1027 (ISO) » Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:00 pm

Fate (5) - Toogeloo, chesskid3, bunnylover, danakillsu, Katsuki
Toogeloo (3) - Fate, Jack, Sociopath

If this is what it looked like when chesskid voted Toog, calling Toog's viable. PLUS the dissonance of later saying "I dun want panda dead d1"

then...

duel....

I don't want to call it a draw... I WANT PANDASCUM DEAD BUT CHESSKID IS RACING TO THE FINISH LINE?

chesskid3 · Post Post #1028 (ISO) » Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:01 pm

I'm nuking gandalf ASAP. Game with nukes ===> I don't have to post cases

Fate · Post Post #1029 (ISO) » Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:02 pm

NOT IF WE LYNCH YOU FIRST ASSHOLE.

Must.... resist...

Percy · Post Post #1030 (ISO) » Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:03 pm

chesskid3 wrote:HOW MANY TIMES HAVE YOU SEEN FATE LYNCHED ON D1?

If you honestly thought that the wagon wasn't viable and would never end in a lynch, then why did you spend so long voting for him?

Your argument to explain away your inconsistencies has been that you only vote when you think it's going to be a lynch. Now you're saying that a Fate lynch D1 is an impossibility.

You can't have it both ways, bucko.

Fate · Post Post #1031 (ISO) » Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:03 pm

chesskid3 wrote:I'm nuking gandalf ASAP. Game with nukes ===> I don't have to post cases

ALSO NICE FRUCKING RESPONSE TO PERCY WTFPWNING YOU.

DODGE

chesskid3 · Post Post #1032 (ISO) » Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:04 pm

I would love a fate lynch.
I just DON'T SEE IT HAPPENING AND WOULDn'T BE SAD AT ALL WITH A DEAD TOOG

Fate · Post Post #1033 (ISO) » Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:04 pm

STOP DODGING THE FUCKING CASE.

WHAT PART OF ME HAVING 5 VOTES AND TOOG HAVING 3 MADE YOU THINK ONLY A TOOG WAGON WAS VIABLE.

ESPECIALLY GIVEN THAT YOU THINK IM 90% SCUM

chesskid3 · Post Post #1034 (ISO) » Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:06 pm

YOU DON'T DIE D1
EVEN WITH 5 VOTES
IT DOESN'T FUCKING HAPPEN

Fate · Post Post #1035 (ISO) » Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:06 pm

chesskid3 wrote:I would love a fate lynch.
I just DON'T SEE IT HAPPENING AND WOULDn'T BE SAD AT ALL WITH A DEAD TOOG

just don't.

JUST DON'T?

PRESENT TENSE?

YOUR VOTE IS SITTING ON ME RIGHT NOW.

AKA YOUR EARLIER POSTS THAT IMPLY: "i only vote for viable wagons hence my PANDA jump"

IS SCUMY FOR TWO WAYS TO SUNDAY:
1. still my awgon was more viable, as shown by VCPercy
2. YOUR VOTE IS SITTING ON ME WHILE YOU ARE SAYING OUT OF THE OTHER SIDE OF YOU RFUCKIN MOUTH THAT A FATE LYNCH CAN'T HAPPEN TODAY

chesskid3 · Post Post #1036 (ISO) » Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:07 pm

I WOULD LIKE IT TO HAPPEN
IT ISN'T GOING TO BUT I AM STILL GOING TO LEAVE MY VOTE ON YOU UNTIL IT IS REALLY REALLY OBVIOUS THAT IT ISN'T GONIG TO
THEN I WILL SHAMELESSLY BANDWAGON MY NEXT HIGHEST SCUMREAD

Percy · Post Post #1037 (ISO) » Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:07 pm

I rest my case.

Fate · Post Post #1038 (ISO) » Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:08 pm

chesskid3 wrote:YOU DON'T DIE D1
EVEN WITH 5 VOTES
IT DOESN'T FUCKING HAPPEN

THEN WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU VOTING ME??

IN A GAME WITH NUKES?

SURELY YOUR GANDALF READ WOULD BE EASIER TO LYNCH THAN ME*

*ITS INFINITELY EASIER BECAUSE I'VE NEVER BEEN LYNCHED AS TOWN. FOR GOOD FUCKING REASON.

YOU ARE TRAPPED BY YOUR OWN LOGIC.

HOWEVER I HAVE MY HONOR TO OBTAIN. TOOG MUST DIE OR BACK DOWN FIRST BEFORE I CAN LUNGE.

chesskid3 · Post Post #1039 (ISO) » Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:10 pm

GANDALF HAS NO VOTES

Fate · Post Post #1040 (ISO) » Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:11 pm

AND I'M APPARENTLY UNLYNCHABLE. SO WHAT'S YOUR FUCKING POINT?

THAT YOU DON'T VOTE FOR THINGS THAT AREN'T VIABLE?

THAT YOU SIT AROUND AND WAIT FOR PEOPLE TO MAKE CASES ON

YOUR

SCUMREADS?

HORSESHIT.

chesskid3 · Post Post #1041 (ISO) » Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:13 pm

Just let me nuke gandalf and life will be good

Fate · Post Post #1042 (ISO) » Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:13 pm

YOU JUST CLAIMED NUKE. NICE JOB.

NOW YOU'RE ANTI-TOWN FOR 200 AND ONE REASONS.

OH WAIT YOURE ANTI-TOWN FOR ONLY ONE REASON:

BEING FUCKIN SCUM

chesskid3 · Post Post #1043 (ISO) » Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:14 pm

I COULD HAVE TEH SCUB

Fate · Post Post #1044 (ISO) » Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:14 pm

I HAVE A BETTER IDEA, EITHER TODAY OR TOMORROW DEPENDING ON WHO WINS THIS 1V1 DEATHMATCH,

WE SHOVE UP A WAGON UP YOUR ASS.

YOU'VE ALREADY CLAIMED.

WE ASK YOU TO MAKE YOUR OH SO SPECIAL CASE ON 100% GANDALFSCUM. I LOOKED THROUGH HIS ISO AND SEE NOTHING THAT JUMPS OUT. PLUS HE'S VOTIN TOOGSCUM.

YOU REFUSE?

YOU DIE.

DEAL?

chesskid3 · Post Post #1045 (ISO) » Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:15 pm

I could make a case
Would be easier to just nuke him

Fate · Post Post #1046 (ISO) » Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:18 pm

WALP.

You'll be dead soon enough scumbag.

For now let's stop the back and forth before this gets to 50 pages.

Jack · Post Post #1047 (ISO) » Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:18 pm

chesskid3 wrote:I could make a case
Would be easier to just nuke him

It's defcon 2 tomorrow
You can't nuke people in defcon 2

What makes you think you're going to make it to defcon 1?

Toogeloo · Post Post #1048 (ISO) » Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:19 pm

Fate wrote:HOWEVER I HAVE MY HONOR TO OBTAIN. TOOG MUST DIE OR BACK DOWN FIRST BEFORE I CAN LUNGE.

All yours. I concede that you aren't what I thought you were at the start of DEFCON 3.

Unvote

If we both survive this day, promise me we won't be making out on the next day phase? I don't want you cooties or nothing.

chesskid3 · Post Post #1049 (ISO) » Mon Dec 20, 2010 5:21 pm

Jack wrote:
chesskid3 wrote:I could make a case
Would be easier to just nuke him
It's defcon 2 tomorrow
You can't nuke people in defcon 2

What makes you think you're going to make it to defcon 1?

Because if I seriously get lynched it should be rather obvious that gandalf+scumbuddies+otherscumteam are pushing it pretty goddamn heavily?