Mini 1100 - Hair Trigger Mafia (Over)

[Narsis]

Tackle: Leo

so any particular strategies people have in mind to try?

[Narsis]

We need a successful tackle at least once every 10 days. We vote on the tackler and the tacklee - this is basically double-lynching.

you mean bomb not tackle right?

[Narsis]

We need a successful tackle at least once every 10 days. We vote on the tackler and the tacklee - this is basically double-lynching.

you mean bomb not tackle right?

blah derp yes.
The two top suspects will be double-lynched - one bombs the other, it hardly matters which. We should do this on a 10-day cycle, which provides us 10 extra days of leeway just in case.
Or we could all bomb each other within a week for lulz, but I'd prefer to win tyvm.

right. the question then is how do we figure out said top suspects? we could have an RBS of sorts, but i'm not sure how well that'd go or if it'd really be helpful at all.

[Narsis]

Uh... we scumhunt, of course -_-

well duh. but without an RVS to start things off that's a bit more difficult.

[Narsis]

This game doesn't follow the traditional day/night cycle, as far as I can tell - there's no scum nightkill.
If we take this at a good pace and don't randomly do dumb stuff like Leo here, this should be a pretty easy town victory.
...because the setup is fundamentally flawed, sorry Llama
I just realized we're playing a broken game. Using the doublelynch method, we have 6 chances to hit scum before town can lose (assuming 3 scum). So yeah.

MOD: Can you confirm that: 1. This game does not a have a day/night cycle? 2. The mafia do not have a kill?

we would only have 3 shots so to speak. but yeah that's 6 chances. it's similar to having 3 mislynches.

[Narsis]

No, because we have the top two suspects bomb each other. AKA double-lynch.

right. but we can only do that 3 times before we'd lose if we dont ever hit scum.

[Narsis]

I wouldn't say flawed so much... its balanced in that to kill, you must be killed so it makes you think more before you act. Other than that its Russian roulette.

Also, Leo should bomb himself

is it possible for someone to bomb themselves?

[Narsis]

my only qualms about quadz bombing Jerbs is that Jerbs is V/LA and likely won't be able to say anything before he's dead.

[Narsis]

I highly recommend that no one tackle before presenting their thought process describing why they are.
For their sake, as well as mine.

I disagree 100%. Actions matter more than words.

that doesnt mean a player shouldn't explain why they are doing what they are doing.

[Narsis]

that doesnt mean a player shouldn't explain why they are doing what they are doing.

Well if you want, you can explain why you are active lurking and IIoA'ing. But I care more about your act of doing so than about your explanation, so you'll still be my #3.

I don't want people to be intimidated out of tackling just because they don't have a lot to say about it. Tackling means you doubt that either Jerbs or quadz is scum; it's as simple as that.

i'm not "active lurking" any more then you are.

and why would someone be intimidated out of tackling cause they don't have much to say? this is mafia...you better have something to say and a reason for doing what you are doing. sure tackling would mean you doubt they are scum, but that doesn't mean said person can't say why they dont think they are scum.

and ftr i hold the same stance on votes in a normal game. if you can't give a reason why you voted someone, then i wonder why you are voting them.

[Narsis]

That is true, and adjusted. So I owe a scene which is happening now...

:disgruntled: at change, but rule 10 is rule 10

i'm not "active lurking" any more then you are.

you're joking, right? Do a self-ISO.

ISO 1: obvtackle, and "So, what should we do?"
ISO 2: "You made a typo, right?"
ISO 3: "How do we find scum?"
ISO 4: "I can't scumhunt without a RVS!!!"
ISO 5: IIoA
ISO 6: IIoA
ISO 7: Snark? Can't tell.
ISO 8: "I have qualms! but am not tackling."
ISO 9: "People should say why they're doing what they do."
ISO 10: Serious talk, but no suspects.

Do you believe Ant is scum or town?

let's ISO you then why don't we:

1. "RANDOM BOMBING ATTACK!"
2. "That was a random bomb i did btw."
3. "Oh right these two people should bomb each other for no reason"
4. "You want a townie to bomb him??!?!!!/1!?1?1!?"
5. "I made a scum list which instantly makes me super town and totally awesome"
6. "Flavour speculation and obvious comments"
7. "Actions are more important then words!"
8. "I'm so awesomely cool town for saying that actions are important. Oh and people shouldn't be intimidated."
9. "I'm going to completely mis-rep you"

[Narsis]

We're 1 bomb away from losing now.
AntB, you suck.

Bomb: Untrod Tripod

If this is wrong, then I fail forever anyways.

you do realize that if you are town and if UT is town, then it's game over right?

and so far i havent seen anything to point to either of you being scum.

[Narsis]

...
Wow. You're retarded if you wanted to bomb me.
You're also scum, so I barely care.

if he's scum, then why arent you bombing him?

[Narsis]

Tackle: Parama

i think you going after UT is a bad move as i think both of you are town at the moment (or more likely to be town then mafia). i think we should go back to the strategy of having out two scummiest suspects bomb each other.

[Narsis]

V/LA for at least the next 4 days