Mini 1100 - Hair Trigger Mafia (Over)

[Zang]

Random Bombing Stage, anyone?

Vote: Untrod Tripod

Tackle: RichardGHP

[Zang]

Tackle: Leo

This game doesn't follow the traditional day/night cycle, as far as I can tell - there's no scum nightkill.

Scum could still have a day kill that they have to submit between bombings.

zang should bomb ant.

Why?

[Zang]

Why is quadz bombing jerbs?

[Zang]

The same reason you don't pay attention, I guess.

Sorry, I'm in a bitchy mood. RTFT.

Nik, I think he's (quadz) borderline scummy.

I did pay attention to the thread and Parama explained why quadz was bombing but I don't think he explained why Jerbs should be bombed.

[Zang]

Ok, Why is Jerbs being bombed?

[Zang]

Tackle: quadz08

[Zang]

The hell.

This is what happens when you tell someone to bomb someone else without any reason. Jerbs did nothing scummy and if you thought it was so obvious that quadz was scum then you should have bombed him yourself.

[Zang]

Tackle: AntB

no

Jerbs did plenty scummy.
quadz did plenty scummy.
You seem like you're scum trying to play the Cassandra card, Zang. If you thought Jerbs was town, you could've, y'know, told me WHY I was wrong instead of just sayin "lol ur rong nub".

3 posts in the RVS and a V/LA notice are so scummy.

And I didn't think Jerbs was town, I just had no reason to suspect him as scum. I pretty much did explain it though when I asked why Jerbs was being bombed and you just said that you told him to do it.

[Zang]

>tackles person bombing Rich
>votes Rich

Looks like we're:
A. Not reading
B. Have double standards
C. Are Scum

D. Doesn't think Leo should randomly bomb someone.
E. Understands that voting does nothing.

And then Jerbs' next two posts are IIoA. Look at this awesome scumhunting:

So he's not scumhunting in the RVS.

How is saying something obvious scummy?

[Zang]

Zang's original mistackle may have been intentional, it's impossible to tell. Then the tackle in post 38 came after my bombing had already been canceled, which may have been done only for townpoints, it's impossible to tell.
Questioning the first town-town bombing, and tackling it, is something scum might do, especially if there wasn't enough opposition to actually stop it. But it's also something town would do if they disagreed with it. We have to consider it a slight towntell. The only problem I see is that zang was inconsistent with that when he did not comment on Ant's bombing.

The tackle was intentional. I didn't notice his bombing until after I tackled him. It was supposed to be a random tackle instead of a vote.

 I didn't think that the bombing was cancelled though because there are 12 alive so I thought it would take 7 to tackle, I didn't think that the bomber couldn't tackle.

Why would scum try to stop a Townie bombing another Townie?

Ants bomb had a valid reason behind it, I don't really see you or AntB as town and nobody has given any reason why he should be stopped. So I'm fine with it.

[Zang]

I would tackle now but I was planning to bomb Parama anyway.

[Zang]

Why am I scum? Why is Untrod scum?

[Zang]

Why the hell would you bomb Parama?

Why do you think that scumParama would bomb UT at this moment as opposed to letting the town destroy itself?

Why the hell wouldn't I? Parama hasn't done anything to help the town. He directed quadz to bomb Jerbs with very little reasoning, wouldn't explain it to me when I asked and doesn't explain why UT or I am scum.

He's trying to seem like town by bombing UT but he knows that he'll be tackled.

Why do either of these questions matter?

Declaring someone as scum without any reasoning is extremely scummy.

Next, NS bombs Zang. 
If the game's still going, I bomb Nikanor for the win.

Next, I'm going to bomb you or Parama if he is still alive.

[Zang]

What have you done to help the town? You weren't saying why the quadz-Jerbs bombing was wrong earlier. There's no reason for him to explain why UT or you are scum because UT's being bombed and you're about to be.

I have tried to stop town bombings and was going to bomb scum. It was wrong because as far as I knew, there was no reasoning behind it. So in a normal game, it's ok for me to vote for someone without any reasoning?

This doesn't make any sense. If parama was scum, it'd make much more sense for him to arrange another bombing, wouldn't it?

But he gets more town points for himself bombing.

Why?

Because he's faking scumhunting.

I won't stop you from bombing me. 48 hours is more than enough time to provide reasoning for the last bombing.

So you're going to give reasoning for the bombing after the bombing? Why not before?

[Zang]

then why aren't you tackling, Zang?

Because I think Parama is scum.

Why would he care about town points, though? It's endgame. He needs one more successful town-town bombing to win. And since you believe that he's just doing this for town cred, how many of his buddies do you think are tackling him right now?

He couldnt get far on just randomly telling people to bomb eachother or maybe the scummy person that town would most likely want to bomb is also scum.

You and Parama are scumbuddies but I don't know who else is scum or if they are on his wagon.

Or maybe he's seriously scumhunting and you're simply disapproving of his style. Read Fates Mafia, you'll see the same style.

There is nothing pro-town about not revealing your reasoning for wanting someone dead. 

I'm giving reasoning for the bombing that will occur after your bombing on me goes through.

What?

[Zang]

Bomb: Parama

[Zang]

Zang is just attacking everyone who suspects him. AKA, he's scum.

I attacked you before you suspected me.

He's been doing a fine job of it so far. And it's not like the town has been overwhelmingly demanding the bomb of anyone, really.

But he shouldn't be doing it at all. And has been demanding bombings.

For someone who hates unexplained scumreads so much, I'd expect you to explain statements like this more often.

But not explaining scumreads is different than denying to give them and my reasoning is very obvious if you look at my posts.

You ignored my point.

What's your point? That he has done this before? I really don't care, it is scummy and I see no pro-town motivation for doing it.

[Zang]

V/LA until December 27

[Zang]

I was v/la until yesterday.

Parama, who should bomb Zang, then?

Nobody's going to bomb me, after Parama bombs Untrod, I am going to bomb nachomamma.

[Zang]

The fact that NS isn't tackling means that he's probably town. If anyone else cares to show up, a tackle would be great.

But if he was town, wouldn't he want to tackle to stop a town bombing? I'm not tackling because if he is town he is probably using the same scum hunting that Parama used and this way I don't have to bomb him.

[Zang]

Not if he thinks that Nacho is scum.

But he said this-

I'm still considering what you may or may not be.

This doesn't even make sense.

What I am saying is that I'm not tackling for two reasons.

1.Parama was town so if he is town then I trust his judgement on who is scum.
2.If he is scum then he'll die and I don't have to bomb him.

[Zang]

You're acknowledging below that NS thinks that Nacho is scummy, right? With the "I trust his judgement on who is scum." You were trying to argue to me that he's not town because he won't tackle Nacho, even though he's unsure as to Nacho's alignment. THEN you said that you're not tackling because if he is town, you trust his judgement in Nachoscum. You can't have it both ways. Did you think that NS saw Nachoscum or did you think that NS was unsure?

No, I acknowledged that nacho thought that NS was scum.

[Zang]

Tackle: Albert B. Rampage

[Zang]

I think Nikanor should bomb jimfinn since ABR seems very pro-town and I know that I'm town. Although I will bomb jimfinn if the town wants me dead.

[Zang]

If you want me dead let me bomb someone.

This way, You get who you want killed and I get who I want killed.

[Zang]

Yes, but you're probably not going to bomb ABR.

No, but you can't kill both of us anyway.

[Zang]

Bomb: Jimfinn