You know a game's going to be slow when...TheButtonmen wrote:V/LAuntil Saturday night.
Exams.
Anyways, confirm and all that jazz, preemptive OMGUS
Thanks, but you're not Plum.TheButtonmen wrote:Unvote; Vote: LC
Holy crap, Guderian is Count Dooku?Jerbs wrote:Count Dooku was overconfidentGuderian wrote:Vote : Jerbs
Whats wrong with confidence?
He was sith
sith is evil
evil is bad
I'm unsure on Guderian (did I attack him? I must've missed it) and I want to hear a response from SC before I take any further action.Internet Stranger wrote:Easy. Lord Cable is hedging his bandwagon bets already and we have barely started. He has already set Guderian and Strangercoug up for later attacks.
You say that like you don't really think I'm scum.Internet Stranger wrote:I say we lynch him.
Oh, so that's what you meant by your original "for sucking" bit. Because it was totally an obvious OMGUS. Yeah no. And you're acting like it was obvious here.StrangerCoug wrote:You are overreacting here. I had no read on anybody, so I voted him for voting me. The "for sucking" is admitting that it is an OMGUS vote, as it stands for "Lord Cable wrote:unvote, vote: StrangerCoug
So your RVS logic is a pseudo-policy lynch? On an obvious townie? Ehehehehe no.ohmyGod, you suck". I also don't like people being called obvtown on page 1 let alone when the RVS is barely over.
UNVOTE: CooLDoG
VOTE: Lord Cable
Which is why you're still voting the same player he's voting.TheButtonmen wrote:ITT we learn SC is just bandwagonning without even reading the posts of the player he is voting as he takes time to;
"Questioned" eh? Because saying "Oh hey you've never played with Plum why do you expect her to vote you" is "questioning" right?TheButtonmen wrote:TheButtonmen wrote:You have never played a game with Plum before as far as I can tell so I'm curious why you would assume she's going to vote you.Lord Cable wrote: Anyways, confirm and all that jazz, preemptive OMGUSvote: Plum.His premptive OMGUS vote has already been a topic I have questioned him on.Lord Cable wrote:@TBM: Alt alert at 11 o'clock!
Besides, pre-emptitive OMGUS lets you be wrong whereas normal OMGUS doesn't. The more you get wrongness out of your system earlier in the game, the more rightness you have when it actually matters. There's no need to question my logic but if you have questions about it feel free to ask.
At the very least, worth keeping my vote on. At most, scum.Guderian wrote:and thus, that makes strangercoug.......?
Well sarcasm on the internet doesn't tend to get expressed very well. It looked serious enough when I read it and I can't really just take your word that it wasn't serious.StrangerCoug wrote:Then do not act like you have no clue what I'm doing. I made it clear that I do not usually support policy lynches, but you were treating my vote as if I were. I clearly was not serious.Lord Cable wrote:I know what OMGUS stands for. I am an alt - do not treat me like a 5 year old.
And I totally could've known that you didn't think CooLDoG was a bad player, right?StrangerCoug wrote:Explaining OMGUS to somebody you know knows what it means is odd, but your push has a flaw—you gave me the impression that I legitimately wanted to get rid of a bad player. Do I believe CooLDoG to be a bad player? No, and even if I did we have not yet completed a game together, so for me to know requires me to meta him.Lord Cable wrote:You say I'm overreacting while also assuming that I don't know what OMGUS means. Your assumption is that I'm overreacting to the OMGUS, knowing it's an OMGUS, but you then try to explain what OMGUS is immediately after. This is a contradiction.
WIFOM is fun. But I don't see any harm in a single player announcing their town reads. It tells town PRs who to protect and/or watch, who not for town PRs to investigate or kill, etc.StrangerCoug wrote:There could be a number of reasons. Trying to get town off their scumbuddy, telling other scumbuddies who to kill (which is why people rarely like announcing town reads at all), etc. It can get pretty complex.Lord Cable wrote:Also, tell me the scum motivation for calling people obvtown on page 1. Really. I think CooLDoG is town, so I am announcing this to the world. If it makes the scum flock over in my direction and try to make me dead, so be it, it only makes them easier to find.
Is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Because I think you're town, for a post that gives me nice town vibes, I must be scum? You must have really low self-esteem. I'm pro at reading newbies and some bad players (not saying you are one, of course). Plus I don't see scum attacking the person who has a town read on them... generally not a good idea.CooLDoG wrote:LC must be scum for thinking I'm town. Nobody thinks I'm town in any game I have ever played.
Bwahahaha you're scum too aren't you?Guderian wrote:unvote
vote: Lord Cable
I never wanted you to vote me. Why would I want anyone to vote me?Plum wrote:LC, why do you want me to vote you?
Since you sound so 100% sure on this - avatar bets. If you're town and you lynch me as scum, you can pick my avatar for the next month. If you're town and you lynch me as town, I pick yours.Internet Stranger wrote:Its scumbag suicide after they have been identified as such a scumbag by me. Not the first time, really.
Wait, so you're admitting you think I'm scum (using the word bus) yet you call TBM out for leaving his vote on me? Herpderp contradiction.Nachomamma8 wrote:What makes you think they haven't already done just that?Guderian wrote: I wonder which scumbag is going to sheepishly show up and bus their partner?
Meta is pretty useless though.StrangerCoug wrote:Well, you could've meta'd me and seen if I had any previous interactions with him (despite my horrendously out of date Wiki page). You could've meta'd CooLDoG and see what would likely be my impression of him, even though you have a point that you wouldn't know what it would be for sure.Lord Cable wrote:And I totally could've known that you didn't think CooLDoG was a bad player, right?
1. I do not know but it's safe to assume that town has at least one power role. 9p Mountainous would really suck for town.StrangerCoug wrote:That may be true, and I admit that this is WIFOM territory, but do you, as a vanilla townie (this is merely an assumption), know that power roles exist in the setup? If you are a power role trying to get people to think you're not, do you know that there are other power roles in case your cover is blown? Don't you think the Mafia might take how power roles that they think could exist into account?Lord Cable wrote:WIFOM is fun. But I don't see any harm in a single player announcing their town reads. It tells town PRs who to protect and/or watch, who not for town PRs to investigate or kill, etc.
DGB, I don't need to hear it right now.Plum wrote:Wrong answer.Lord Cable wrote:Not claiming for such a terrible wagon.
Paraphrasing a role PM takes seconds, fabricating a good fakeclaim takes an eternity.