Mini 255 - RajÔÇÖs Freaktown I (The Beginning)- GAMEOVER

Iammars · Post Post #3 (isolation #0) » Sun Nov 27, 2005 2:32 pm

Random Vote: Stewie

Three kills? Ugh.

Iammars · Post Post #8 (isolation #1) » Sun Nov 27, 2005 3:01 pm

And I thought that avatar was one of a jester...

Iammars · Post Post #9 (isolation #2) » Sun Nov 27, 2005 3:31 pm

Oh, and...

Iammars · Post Post #11 (isolation #3) » Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:45 pm

rolandofthewhite wrote:This game excites me in so many ways.

[/hijack]

Arrrrrrrr matey, yes it should.

Iammars · Post Post #13 (isolation #4) » Sun Nov 27, 2005 7:12 pm

How arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrre we spamming other people's threads?

Iammars · Post Post #15 (isolation #5) » Sun Nov 27, 2005 7:15 pm

Oh, right. I totally knew that.

YARRRRRRRRRRRRR!

(Hey, guess what my role has to do with!)

Iammars · Post Post #17 (isolation #6) » Sun Nov 27, 2005 7:22 pm

LyingBrian wrote:is it a post restriction (not really RESTRICTING you, but nevertheless), or are you just role-playing?

The picture is. The rest is roleplaying.

Iammars · Post Post #20 (isolation #7) » Sun Nov 27, 2005 7:32 pm

Yup. I just watched the movie yesterday.

And you seem to be good at naming those obscure Disney/Disney-like movies.

And where's the sigma?

Iammars · Post Post #25 (isolation #8) » Mon Nov 28, 2005 2:13 am

Falcone wrote:This looks like a crazy game. Too bad I'm not going to be able to play. Go town!

True and this is supposed to be regularrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.

Iammars · Post Post #29 (isolation #9) » Mon Nov 28, 2005 7:19 am

YAR RLY!

Iammars · Post Post #33 (isolation #10) » Mon Nov 28, 2005 11:15 am

I think three scum groups. Unless we have a REALLY dumb vig. If you are a vig, and you made one of last night's kills, please let us know.

Iammars · Post Post #35 (isolation #11) » Mon Nov 28, 2005 12:49 pm

logicticus wrote:Can you have 2 sks?

Sure, why not? Hell, we could have 3 SKs and no mafia for all we know...

Iammars · Post Post #45 (isolation #12) » Wed Nov 30, 2005 12:04 pm

So, we get darq to claim first...

Iammars · Post Post #52 (isolation #13) » Thu Dec 01, 2005 5:02 am

@Don: Yeah,it's weird. Look at Raj's profile.

Iammars · Post Post #58 (isolation #14) » Thu Dec 01, 2005 1:56 pm

Yeah, Animafia. But that still only had 2 kills per night...

Iammars · Post Post #60 (isolation #15) » Thu Dec 01, 2005 2:07 pm

Of course, one of those two kills were used on me, THE NIGHT I REPLACED SOMEONE!!!

Iammars · Post Post #61 (isolation #16) » Thu Dec 01, 2005 4:22 pm

Oh, and now I can also officialy say that We Didn't Start the Fire does as well.
(Which coincidentaly is based loosly off of Animafia)

Iammars · Post Post #89 (isolation #17) » Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:53 am

I have a restriction. Yar should be able to guess what it is...

I already fufilled it, back on Page 1.

Iammars · Post Post #91 (isolation #18) » Sun Dec 04, 2005 9:15 am

No, I agree that we should probably claim posting restrictions. Get them out of the way so that they will have very little effect on the rest of the game.

I'll voulenteer to start.
I have to post a picture of a pirate every day or else I'm modkilled. All of the other stuff has been roleplaying.

Iammars · Post Post #92 (isolation #19) » Sun Dec 04, 2005 9:46 am

OK, raj just cleared this up with me, and apparently the lingo is a restriction that I have to do a couple of times per day. I think I covered that...

Iammars · Post Post #97 (isolation #20) » Sun Dec 04, 2005 3:29 pm

darquiel, make sure that you're posting under the right account...

Iammars · Post Post #101 (isolation #21) » Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:28 am

I'm confused as to what we're all confused about. Maybe I missed something over the weekend, but what's going on?

Iammars · Post Post #134 (isolation #22) » Wed Dec 07, 2005 10:20 am

Fun. I won;t be the only one postign pictures...

YAR!

Iammars · Post Post #137 (isolation #23) » Wed Dec 07, 2005 11:45 am

Oh geez. I didn't need to see that...

Iammars · Post Post #156 (isolation #24) » Sat Dec 10, 2005 3:36 am

Unvote

No reason to leave my random vote on.

Also, did darq claim her role name?

Iammars · Post Post #159 (isolation #25) » Sat Dec 10, 2005 6:39 am

How about claiming now?

Vote: LyingBrian

Iammars · Post Post #162 (isolation #26) » Sat Dec 10, 2005 7:48 am

LyingBrian wrote:@Iammars:

are you promising you'll stick around to unvote when you realize the mistake you've made?

Yup. In fact, if you're a certain role, I can confirm you.

Iammars · Post Post #164 (isolation #27) » Sat Dec 10, 2005 8:58 am

Ok,

Unvote

.

Hmm... intresting claim. Someone want to test this?

Iammars · Post Post #171 (isolation #28) » Sat Dec 10, 2005 9:34 am

LyingBrian wrote:on the bright side, i don't have to worry about any hidden agendas now!

YAR!

Iammars · Post Post #173 (isolation #29) » Sat Dec 10, 2005 10:21 am

elvis_knits wrote:
RotN
- only because his role is Roland. We already know that inHim is most likely a scum role (from the death by bible stuff last night). I'm thinking that the foursome of friends from raj's hometown that are also scummers (MOS, raj, Roland, inHim) could be our scum. But maybe that's too breakable. I'll just put it as a possibility.

OKAY. That's my super-long post for you all. Please tell me what you all think of these things! Let's put it all out there!

I can say that at least one of the four is not scum.

Iammars · Post Post #176 (isolation #30) » Sat Dec 10, 2005 3:33 pm

Chaos wrote:I cannot vote until after I eat supper.

I'm 99% sure that I said this already so...
FOS: elvis_knits
.

We just did. You can vote now.

Iammars · Post Post #177 (isolation #31) » Sat Dec 10, 2005 3:34 pm

Don Gaetano wrote:
I can say that at least one of the four is not scum.
Not necessarily, Raj could be scum in his spare time

Raj is alex, right?

Iammars · Post Post #188 (isolation #32) » Sun Dec 11, 2005 4:31 am

LB, I have no idea about raj's life besides what has been said on this forum. You're thinking of elvis.

And I think a name claim would be good.

Iammars · Post Post #190 (isolation #33) » Sun Dec 11, 2005 5:16 am

The pros is that it helps my role.

Iammars · Post Post #219 (isolation #34) » Sun Dec 11, 2005 1:09 pm

I'm here, but not voting LyingBrian. If I'm alive tomorrow, we name claim.

Iammars · Post Post #223 (isolation #35) » Sun Dec 11, 2005 1:28 pm

Don Gaetano wrote:oh, and a vaginal cup is a hygienic device that originates from the orient if I'm not mistaken. It's used to gather up blood during that time of the month... cough... I can't believe I knew that, without having to check it up. I know way too many things I don't need to know.

And you're male...

Iammars · Post Post #225 (isolation #36) » Sun Dec 11, 2005 1:32 pm

Don Gaetano wrote:
And you're male...
I know, I know. I'm gonna hang myself now...

That's the downside of having a photographic memory. The 16 languages come in handy, though

I hope that doesn't mean you've seen one...

And I wish I had a photographic memory. Might bring my Spanish grade up...

Iammars · Post Post #228 (isolation #37) » Sun Dec 11, 2005 1:49 pm

Who are we going to lynch? roland or the unnightkillable townie. Those seem like our only two options, and neither look appealing.

Iammars · Post Post #230 (isolation #38) » Sun Dec 11, 2005 1:50 pm

Yarrr, please do.

Iammars · Post Post #232 (isolation #39) » Sun Dec 11, 2005 1:56 pm

Don Gaetano wrote:
Raj is alex, right?
I think one of Raj's real names is Alex, yes. Most likely the "a" in Raj

I also think we have to hurry up and lynch someone, time is running out, and if I understood the rules correctly there will be no lynch unless someone gets 5 votes on them, period.

So I'll
vote: LyingBrian
again

The more I think about it, the more sense it makes. There can't possibly be a day killing group in this game considering the amount of night kills there was last night. That means that if LyingBrian was pro-town it would be impossible for the scum to win, unless the members of the hypotetical two-person mafia both remained untill the end with him. The other killing groups wouldn't be able to win at all.

How can a pro-town role be immune to night kills when we have so many different killing groups? The only explanations I can see are that either:

1. The scum have another winning conditions than "last group standing" which is normal, and we haven't been told about it.

2. There's actually just 1 killing group, they just get to kill 3 people, in completely different ways each night.

3. Raj messed up the layout for the game, and didn't think about the consequences of having an un-killable townie.

4. LyingBrian is scum, if he lied about his role or not.

If those are the options I'd guess option 4 is most likely. I just can't believe it's that easy. Am I missing something? Are there other options?

Since I'm pretty new at this I might be overlooking something obvious. Please correct me if I'm missing something. If I'm wrong I promise to apologise and hide under the table in shame, but if I'm right LyingBrian has to be scum.

You mean this quote, correct?
Looking at this from a mod's point of view, 3 nightkilling groups is hard to balance in a mini. You need a lot of doc-like roles or self-protection roles to make sure we don't go into lynch-or-lose on D2. Plus the fact that a power role WILL die N1. I believe that LB's role makes sense, and that it is probably a very important role in the balance of the game. You make it seem like an unnightkillable townie completely breaks the setup, which I believe it doesn't, but is essential to the setup.

Iammars · Post Post #234 (isolation #40) » Sun Dec 11, 2005 2:02 pm

He hasn't roleclaimed yet, and it's very important to my role that people claim before they're lynched.

Iammars · Post Post #236 (isolation #41) » Sun Dec 11, 2005 2:05 pm

Don Gaetano wrote:If there's only one scum group then the town has already lost, since they can kill three times each night. If there are more, then the town has a chance because they will eventually target each other and/or the same individual. So there has to be more than one scum group (most likely 3 considering the kills last night). If there are many scum groups. How can the scum win if there's an un-nightkillable townie? Except for a few HIGHLY unlikely scenarios, the best the scum could do is to hope for a draw. Doesn't that break the setup?

Did LB say he was Unlynchable? NO. When the scum has majority, they can lynch him with no opposition.

Iammars · Post Post #243 (isolation #42) » Sun Dec 11, 2005 2:13 pm

First of all, you're assuming that there are three or more scum groups. Personally, I hope that one of those was a stupid vig.
Second, I'm sure that raj has dealt with that situation and has a mod note on that. And there have been games that ended in draws. Muppets and Tom Cruise Mini come to mind.

Iammars · Post Post #245 (isolation #43) » Sun Dec 11, 2005 2:14 pm

Don Gaetano wrote:
CLAIM DON
I think it's better if I wait untill tomorow to do that, if people want me to.

Just say your role name. If it's a certain one, then I can help you.

Iammars · Post Post #249 (isolation #44) » Sun Dec 11, 2005 2:17 pm

Don Gaetano wrote:
And there have been games that ended in draws. Muppets and Tom Cruise Mini come to mind.
I'm not saying that a game couldn't end in a draw. I'm saying that if Lb is pro-town, then the game would either end with a town victory or a draw, and that doesn't make sense.

You're automatically assuming that the scum will always be down to max one scum per group at the end of the game, which may/may not be true. There is most likely a group of two or more out there, and if at least two of them survive, they can win.

Iammars · Post Post #250 (isolation #45) » Sun Dec 11, 2005 2:19 pm

And on an unrelated note, this game is driving my post count up tonight.

Iammars · Post Post #253 (isolation #46) » Sun Dec 11, 2005 2:25 pm

Don Gaetano wrote:
Just say your role name. If it's a certain one, then I can help you.
How could you help me? You mean help me during the night?

You're automatically assuming that the scum will always be down to max one scum per group at the end of the game, which may/may not be true. There is most likely a group of two or more out there, and if at least two of them survive, they can win.
But that would mean that the scum groups with less than two people wouldn't be able to win, and the chances of both members of one scum group surviving to the end, when there's two other scum groups out there are slim to nothing. (if there's a 2 person mafia and 2 serial killers that is)

First of all, yes, I have a night ability that might be able to help you. We have about five minutes, if you're going to do it please do it now.

Second, they can win. Example situation:

2 Mafia
2 SK
LB

Iammars · Post Post #255 (isolation #47) » Sun Dec 11, 2005 2:26 pm

I need name first.

Iammars · Post Post #258 (isolation #48) » Sun Dec 11, 2005 2:27 pm

Nope. Sorry, but it does help narrow it down. Thanks.

And about the docs, I would only attack them if it seemed unbalanced. IMO, LB does not appear to balance the game.

Iammars · Post Post #261 (isolation #49) » Sun Dec 11, 2005 2:29 pm

I think elvis feels that we need to lynch today, and that you are our best choice. Not nec. that you are scummy.

I don't I'm quite content w/ a no lynch.

Iammars · Post Post #262 (isolation #50) » Sun Dec 11, 2005 2:29 pm

elvis_knits wrote:because you keep wanting to lynch LB and refuse to see logic

stupid simul post.

Iammars · Post Post #263 (isolation #51) » Sun Dec 11, 2005 2:30 pm

Hate to third, but this is giving me great practice for next year's spamoff.

Iammars · Post Post #264 (isolation #52) » Sun Dec 11, 2005 2:31 pm

We hit deadline?

Methinks so.

Iammars · Post Post #266 (isolation #53) » Sun Dec 11, 2005 2:31 pm

Of course, you know that one of us is going to turn up dead tonight, just to simplify things...

Iammars · Post Post #268 (isolation #54) » Sun Dec 11, 2005 2:34 pm

*prays, then realizes that inHim is probably scum, so starts doing satanic dances instead*

Iammars · Post Post #275 (isolation #55) » Tue Dec 13, 2005 6:32 am

Damn you all.

Can I still win?

Iammars · Post Post #312 (isolation #56) » Thu Dec 15, 2005 9:18 am

BOOOO! Bad joke.

*Goes back to deadland*

Iammars · Post Post #629 (isolation #57) » Sun Jan 22, 2006 11:11 am

I wish I had won...