Mars 2/Mini 243 - We Didn't Start the Fire, Game Over

stark · Post Post #26 (isolation #0) » Wed Oct 26, 2005 1:08 am

vote:

brian

for his funky avatar. Looks like a retired pirate

stark · Post Post #49 (isolation #1) » Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:29 am

Tamuz wrote:
unvote: BJ
Vote: Stark

Quick to attack a man when he is gone, eh?

And I still want BJ around, don't think me not voting for him gives you permission to kill him

ey man, i just wasnt in the mood to jump on a bandwagon, and my vote was very random. but, now that you mention it:

unvote
Vote:tamuz

stark · Post Post #94 (isolation #2) » Sat Oct 29, 2005 1:08 pm

is it just me, or does bj seem a little eager for a kill?

stark · Post Post #103 (isolation #3) » Sun Oct 30, 2005 11:16 am

perhaps i am a little behind, but so far, i see two options regarding BJ v Bamboo
A) BJ has an investigative role and knows bamboo is scum, or
B), BJ is scum, and is trying to act like A)

any thoughts?

stark · Post Post #105 (isolation #4) » Sun Oct 30, 2005 11:22 am

i would just like to state that i will keep most things in my possestion out of your...... um. moving on, how far is bamboo away from lynch?

stark · Post Post #107 (isolation #5) » Sun Oct 30, 2005 11:31 am

alright then, peer pressure power.

vote: bamboo

stark · Post Post #134 (isolation #6) » Fri Nov 04, 2005 1:25 am

bahahahaha, king pin

if thats what you want to think, sure. how is this, aye? BJ is the one who pushed for a quick lynch, not i. i felt that if bamboo turned up scum, i would look suspicious for not voting him. all clear now?

stark · Post Post #140 (isolation #7) » Sat Nov 05, 2005 2:18 am

bump. perhaps we could use a vote count?

stark · Post Post #150 (isolation #8) » Sun Nov 06, 2005 11:05 am

moving on, i was looking at the deathscenes. does AIDS sound like a valid role to you? it was in the song, and it would explain the death by disease...

stark · Post Post #152 (isolation #9) » Sun Nov 06, 2005 11:25 am

ok, but the least we can do is start to think about some of the roles, no?

stark · Post Post #154 (isolation #10) » Sun Nov 06, 2005 12:07 pm

ok, so that is out of the question. do we have any other leads?

stark · Post Post #164 (isolation #11) » Mon Nov 07, 2005 3:02 pm

yes, perhaps a claim would be in order maybe?

stark · Post Post #176 (isolation #12) » Tue Nov 08, 2005 8:36 am

vote: BJ

stark · Post Post #179 (isolation #13) » Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:35 pm

i am firmly against trigger happiness. at this point, i understand your reasoning with lynching those who claim townie, considering that scum generaly are not that creative. however, with such a diverse range of role choices, im sure that they can make up something. i also believe that there might be more vanillas, which, if we go by your method, will result in repetitive bad lynches for town. that explain it?

stark · Post Post #199 (isolation #14) » Wed Nov 09, 2005 10:09 am

i concur that BJ's claim is far fetched. do you know the role name of your partner, so we can get some verification? tell me though, if you dont know the name or rolename of your partner, whats the point of being a masoN?

stark · Post Post #213 (isolation #15) » Wed Nov 09, 2005 3:31 pm

alright, even though i dont like it

unvote

the claim sounds believeableish. not how i would have made a mason set, but its not my game. do we have any other leads at the moment? some hypocracy wars going on, but i dont want to take part in those for now. for the record, my role is completely, utterly unhelpful incase you were wondering.

stark · Post Post #224 (isolation #16) » Thu Nov 10, 2005 2:13 am

if bloojay proves this information, my vote returns. if we lynch bj and he comes up good, we lynch bloojay. appears we have a SAFE lynch, aye?

stark · Post Post #248 (isolation #17) » Fri Nov 11, 2005 2:22 am

ill go with it

vote: bj

do you know who your partner is?

stark · Post Post #258 (isolation #18) » Fri Nov 11, 2005 4:30 pm

want to tell me why?

stark · Post Post #265 (isolation #19) » Sat Nov 12, 2005 4:30 am

i find it a little odd that nai knows your innocent, but you dont know he is. two mason groups seems also very much. what is your role bloojay?

stark · Post Post #267 (isolation #20) » Sat Nov 12, 2005 6:00 am

alright. would a mass claim be not so good for us?

stark · Post Post #275 (isolation #21) » Sat Nov 12, 2005 1:21 pm

your free to lynch me man. im going to come up clean, but your welcome to lynch me. bloojay, can you further define your " mason" group?

stark · Post Post #278 (isolation #22) » Sat Nov 12, 2005 4:03 pm

BabyJesus wrote:
stark wrote:your free to lynch me man. im going to come up clean, but your welcome to lynch me. bloojay, can you further define your " mason" group?
is this a townie claim.....

yes, it is. im doris day, vanilla. happy? or am i your next runup?

stark · Post Post #287 (isolation #23) » Sun Nov 13, 2005 1:53 am

bloojay wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:
BabyJesus wrote:Bloojay, did your pm say you KNOW your mason buddies are innocent? I was a mini (weather mafia) with a 3 mason group where one of my mason buddies there was not....
bump for bloojay..... my role pm specifically said I knew my mason buddy was innocent. Did yours?
Yes, it did state that. And I am starting to get very suspicious of you, stark. What's with the asking of role names? And "definition of my group"? Please explain.

ey man, cut me some slack. this is the first pro-town role ive ever played. you claim to have a three person mason group, this is what im asking you to go into further detail with

stark · Post Post #291 (isolation #24) » Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:36 am

oh, sorry, my bad, forgot about my vote

unvote

stark · Post Post #306 (isolation #25) » Mon Nov 14, 2005 2:55 pm

bump. we havent heard from bloojay in a while. perhaps we need a deadline to get us moving?

stark · Post Post #330 (isolation #26) » Thu Nov 17, 2005 10:49 am

alright, considering that bloojay has failed, at least in my mind, to produce sufficient evidence to support his claim, i hereby

vote bloojay

stark · Post Post #339 (isolation #27) » Thu Nov 17, 2005 4:17 pm

care to explain your role? what have i done suspicion wise? my doubts and my suspicions stand...

stark · Post Post #370 (isolation #28) » Sat Nov 19, 2005 7:28 am

Noted, mafia claim is doubtfull, so i will

unvote

. if mafia is supposed to be town, what do we have left?

vote:LB

stark · Post Post #372 (isolation #29) » Sat Nov 19, 2005 7:54 am

well, we shall see, considering that lb is dead now.

stark · Post Post #382 (isolation #30) » Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:18 am

BabyJesus wrote:time to
vote stark

an explaination would be nice, comrade. note though, that cubsfan was a

paranoid

cop. did you noticed how he kept his vote on me for a while? also

vote: TINM

he, i think, is the best option at the moment

stark · Post Post #386 (isolation #31) » Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:27 pm

feel free to lynch me man, you are simply hurting the town, and i hope that after my death, you come to see the light of truth which will bring you to realize your errors.

stark · Post Post #389 (isolation #32) » Tue Nov 22, 2005 1:43 am

i see now that there is very little i can do to convince you of my innocence. as i said before, i am doris day, a very vannilla townie. let me also remind you, considering that we have not found any definate scum, we should have about 3 left? and if you kill me + nightkill tonight, there are 6 left with about 3 scum?

stark · Post Post #394 (isolation #33) » Tue Nov 22, 2005 10:41 am

pfft, good lynch mumblemumblemumble. why did you keep on blocking cubsfan?

stark · Post Post #395 (isolation #34) » Tue Nov 22, 2005 11:09 am

also, im going to be gone from thursday to sunday, so if you guys want to lynch me, do it quick

stark · Post Post #448 (isolation #35) » Mon Nov 28, 2005 4:42 pm

mmm, nai, post 444 is not so much making sense. and no, im not a doc, or cop, or anything of the sort. i said this alot earlier. im doris day, invested with powers of total vanillaness. also nai, raj did say that he could sing his protest songs. it made absolute sense to sing last night, considering he would probably be the target for scum attack. i am also interested to test our supposed mason group.

vote: tamuzi

stark · Post Post #458 (isolation #36) » Tue Nov 29, 2005 12:24 pm

HAHAHAHAHA!!!! trying to bring suspicion back to me to save your ass?

unvote, vote bloojay

stark · Post Post #480 (isolation #37) » Thu Dec 01, 2005 2:22 pm

my thoughts exactly.

vote: BJ

, or did you guys want Nai?

stark · Post Post #482 (isolation #38) » Thu Dec 01, 2005 3:03 pm

raj, did you want to place the nail?

stark · Post Post #486 (isolation #39) » Thu Dec 01, 2005 3:56 pm

ACH! thorough betrail. horrible. but well played all.